Skip to content

California · Private foundation

Amos and Ruth Wilnai Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$617k
Granted FY2019
16
Itemized grants FY2019
15
Organizations funded FY2019
Read the full brief

Read this first · the figures below need context

65% of Amos and Ruth Wilnai Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Pef Israel Endowment Funds Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 7 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2019, the last year Amos and Ruth Wilnai Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 5 organizations, $617k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

0
’17
0
’18
5
’19
0
’20
0
’21
0
’22
6
’23
7
’24
7
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

Itemized, FY2019
$566k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2019
$2,500
Largest grant, FY2019
$330,000
States reached, FY2019
7
Total assets, FY2019
$26M
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site
82% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

International$2.0MEducation$650kHuman Services$380kPhilanthropy$122kPublic Benefit$120kReligion$48kArts & Culture$12kHealth$6kOther$0

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
OH
NJ
CA
VA
DC

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2019 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 14 grantees
All grantees of Amos and Ruth Wilnai Foundation by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
American Friends of Tel Aviv Univ$500,00030%
The Good People Fund Inc$175,00025%
US Friends of the Van Leer Jerusalem Institute$150,000210%
Israel Democracy Fund$120,00029%
National Yiddish Book Center Inc$4,50030%
Gemach Harabbonim Nfp$3,0001n/a
Oshman Family Jewish Community Center$3,00030%
Silicon Valley Jewish Film Festival$2,50011%
Lev Zahav NFP$2,00010%
Nami Santa Clara County$1,00010%
Kqed Inc$75030%
Jewish Gen Inc$5001n/a
Jewish Funders Network$40010%
American Friends of Hebrew University Inc$24010%

Plus 12 recipients with no EIN on record ($571k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Amos and Ruth Wilnai Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAmerican Friends of Tel Aviv Univ: $500,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetThe Good People Fund Inc: $175,000 over 2y, 5.0% of budgetUS Friends of the Van Leer Jerusalem Institute: $150,000 over 2y, 10% of budgetIsrael Democracy Fund: $120,000 over 2y, 9.0% of budgetNational Yiddish Book Center Inc: $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOshman Family Jewish Community Center: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSilicon Valley Jewish Film Festival: $2,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetLev Zahav NFP: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNami Santa Clara County: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKqed Inc: $750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJewish Funders Network: $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Friends of Hebrew University Inc: $240 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 12.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA8.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Amos and Ruth Wilnai Foundation with peer funders

About Amos and Ruth Wilnai Foundation

How much does Amos and Ruth Wilnai Foundation give?
Amos and Ruth Wilnai Foundation reported 16 itemized grants totaling $565,740, out of $617,490 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2019 IRS filing.
What does Amos and Ruth Wilnai Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2019 to FY2025, its largest causes are International (30%), Education (10%), Human Services (6%).
Who are Amos and Ruth Wilnai Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2019 to FY2025: American Friends of Tel Aviv Univ ($500k), The Good People Fund Inc ($175k), US Friends of the Van Leer Jerusalem Institute ($150k).
Does Amos and Ruth Wilnai Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Amos and Ruth Wilnai Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include National Philanthropic Trust, Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc, Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund.
Where is Amos and Ruth Wilnai Foundation based?
Amos and Ruth Wilnai Foundation is based in CA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Amos and Ruth Wilnai’s filings →

More from the funding graph