· Public charity
Amnesty International of the USA Inc
Amnesty international of the usa, inc.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2018.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 7 grants below total $107,500 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $12,863,836 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $12,756,336 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2018
- Under $10k2 grants · $15k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $93k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Tides Center | $18,600 |
| Community Partners | $18,600 |
| New Venture Fund | $18,600 |
| Urban League | $18,600 |
| States United to Prevent Gun Violence | $18,600 |
| De-Escalate Washington I-940 | $7,500 |
| Illinois Council Agnst Handgun Violence | $7,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–18, $57k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 67% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
Grants abroad, by region — $14M on the FY2024 return
Schedule F, as filed: 2 regions, $14M to organizations and $40k to individuals. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.
Stated purpose: ANNUAL ASSESSMENT · GINETTA SAGAN AWARD
Stated purpose: GINETTA SAGAN AWARD
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The Coalition to Stop Gun Violence seeks to secure freedom from gun violence through research, strategic engagement, and effective policy advocacy.
Urban peace institute reduces and prevents community violence by applying a public health approach to understand the underlying reasons for violence and create innovative, holistic ways to change the conditions that lead to them.…
To reduce violence globally using disease control and behavior change methods.
Educational, research activity on firearms violence.
Enact, protect, and implement gun safety laws in delaware and nationwide.
To mobilize the community to respond to and end domestic, sexual and community violence in the black community. we actualize this mission through research, public awareness and community engagement, and resource development. ujima serves…
Alliance for a Safe Oregon works to make Oregon safer for all Oregonians by ending gun tragedies in our communities. We work with experts, civic leaders and community volunteers to create and advocate for policies, programs and education…
The center for justice innovation is a non-profit organization that works to create a fair, effective, and humane justice system and build strong, thriving communities.
Cepp works collaboratively to improve systems of justice and advance community well-being by sharing expertise, promoting research-informed and emerging practices, and facilitating change.
Advocate for the freedom of children, families and communities to live without gun violence.
To denormalize and distigmatize gun violence in communities of color through education and community events. we build caring community to heal and guide youth to find right path away from gun. we build leaders and advocates who spread…
Guns down focuses on reducing the number of guns in circulation to minimize gun violence
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Center for Transformative Action and the most unlike its peers is Urban League of Louisiana. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CENTER FOR TRANSFORMATIVE ACTION ↗
- Who funds PROVIDENCE YOUTH STUDENT MOVEMENT ↗
- Who funds THE GATHERING FOR JUSTICE INC ↗
- Who funds THE PRAXIS PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds LEGAL COMMUNITY AGAINST VIOLENCE dba LAW CNTR TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE ↗
- Who funds Educational Fund to Stop Gun Violence ↗
- Who funds NEW VENTURE FUND ↗
- Who funds STATES UNITED TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENC CO GPEC-ICHV ↗
- Who funds URBAN LEAGUE OF LOUISIANA ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY PARTNERS ↗
- Who funds TIDES CENTER ↗
- Who funds ILLINOIS COUNCIL AGAINST HANDGUN VIOLENCE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · New Venture Fund · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Amnesty International of the USA Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.