How much did AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC grant in FY2022?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 49% of AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

—

2019

—

2020

—

2021

financialgrowthfoundation's aidaid advancementuniversity's objectivesa&mprofessional

2022

black

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2022 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2022

$10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$50k–250k3 grants · $150k

$50,000

Median grant

States reached

$8.7M

Total assets

Largest grants

NATIONAL SOCIETY OF BLACK CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS INC$50,000
NORTH CAROLINA A&T STATE UNIVERSITY$50,000
NABA INC$50,000
HOWARD UNIVERSITY - CENTER FOR ACCOUNTING EDUCATION$10,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 13% — the area typically sits at 11%. 82% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

58%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$1.3M · 5 repeat orgs$930k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +78% since the first grant, against +51% for the ones you funded once.

5 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2022, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$1.3M

$880k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+78%

+51%

Still filing today

100%

54%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

EducationScience & TechPhilanthropyCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

NS
NATIONAL SOCIETY OF BLACK CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS INC
2× · 2021–2022 · $455k · revenue +5%
NI
NABA INC
5× · 2017–2022 · $398k · revenue +313%
TP
THE PHD PROJECT ASSOCIATION
5× · 2017–2021 · $270k · revenue +78%

Funded once

NC
NORTH CAROLINA A&T STATE UNIVERSITY
one grant, 2021 · $225k
BA
BETA ALPHA PSI
one grant, 2021 · $55k · revenue -5%
WV
WEST VIRGINIA STATE UNIVERSITY
one grant, 2021 · $30k · revenue -10%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

The University Foundation At Sacramento

The university foundation promotes philanthropy to provide a level of excellence at the university beyond what is possible through state funds.

Education

California State University

Connect, engage and celebrate alumni, students and friends of sacramento state while building lifelong relationships that support the future of our university.

Education

American Association of State Colleges

Aascu elevates and transforms member institutions through effective public policy and leadership enabling its members to drive regional economic mobility through student access and success while helping to solve their communities' most…

Education

Furman University

Furman university is an institution of higher education providing distinctive undergraduate education emphasizing an engaged approach combining classroom learning with real world experiences and self-discovery.

Education

Missouri Western State University

Promote private giving and help the university move into the forefront of public higher education.

—

Arizona State University

To support arizona state university and keep alumni connected to their university.

—

Florida Gulf Coast University

The foundation's mission is to support the educational mission of florida gulf coast university.

Education

Allen University

Allen University is an academic community which provides students an opportunity to obtain baccalaureate and graduate degrees in liberal arts and professional programs.

Education

University of Southern Mississippi

Build relationships with alumni and friends in order to secure private funds for the benefit of usm.

Education

University of South Carolina Alumni

Add value to students. engage our alumni. build the brand.

Education

Florida Memorial University Inc

Higher education

Education

California Baptist University

A private institution of higher education, offering students undergraduate and graduate courses.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cal State Fullerton Philanthropic and the most unlike its peers is The Howard University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

19 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

19/19

Grantees still filing

16/19

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$1,087,559Education$781,000Civil Rights$270,000Science & Tech$30,000Philanthropy$30,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Chemical SocietyDC26.4× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Chemical Society · Strada Education Foundation Inc · Folds of Honor Foundation · Thurgood Marshall College Fund · National Collegiate Athletic Association · Deloitte Foundation · Partnership for Education Advancement · Tom Joyner Foundation Inc · Kpmg US Foundation Inc · Tulsa Community Foundation · Tuskegee University · Educational Credit

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

4get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: NABA INC.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

high risk

~2 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 7 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

7 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 4.1× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 237097490 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on NABA INC, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 2 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 15% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to American Institute of Certified Public?

Find your warmest path to American Institute of Certified Public through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

19 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to American Institute of Certified Public?

More from the funding graph

AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

19 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to American Institute of Certified Public?

More from the funding graph