· Public charity
American Federation of Teachers Educational Foundation
The AMERICAN FEDERATION OF TEACHERS EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION (the foundation) was formed in august 1978 to carry on, conduct, and sponsor study and research in educational and related fields, with the objective, among others, of improving and reconstructing the educational system; to disseminate the results of such study and research; and…
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 94% of AMERICAN FEDERATION OF TEACHERS EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k19 grants · $464k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $72k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UFT | $72,000 |
| OCM BOCES FEDERATION OF TEACHRES | $30,000 |
| WATERTOWN EDUCATION ASSOCIATION | $30,000 |
| CHITTENANGO TEACHERS' ASSOCIATION | $30,000 |
| AMERICAN FEDERATION OF TEACHERS LOCAL 801 | $30,000 |
| BALDWINSVILLE TEACHERS ASSOCIATION | $30,000 |
| AMERICAN FED OF TEACHERS 2623 | $30,000 |
| SYRACUSE TEACHERS ASSOCIATION INC | $30,000 |
| UNITED LIVERPOOL FACULTY ASSOCIATION | $30,000 |
| NORTH SYRACUSE EDUCATION ASSOCIATION | $30,000 |
| CRANSTON TEACHERS' ALLIANCE L01704 | $25,000 |
| PINELLAS CLASSROOM TEACHERS ASSOC | $25,000 |
| CINCINNATI FED OF TEACHERS | $25,000 |
| AFT ST LOUIS | $25,000 |
| HELENA EDUCATION ASSOCATION | $24,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 80% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
12 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 18 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 9% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $486k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- AFAMERICAN FEDERATION OF TEACHERS4× · 2017–2023 · $395k · revenue +26%
- OFOHIO FEDERATION OF TEACHERS3× · 2020–2022 · $341k · revenue +18%
- JFJefferson Federation of Teachers AFT 15593× · 2017–2021 · $218k · revenue +33%
Funded once
- PTPAWTUCKET TEACHERS ALLIANCEone grant, 2018 · $100k
- HFHOUSTON FEDERATION OF TEACHERSone grant, 2024 · $100k · revenue -23%
- FAFLORIDA AGRICULTURAL AND MECHANICAL UNIVERSITY CHAPTER OF THE UNITEDone grant, 2024 · $90k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Teachers association
Organize and support public school teachers
The organization is a democratic structure that improves the professional, econimic and personal lives of the members and their families, while strengthens the organizations workplace and furthers the cause of social justice through the…
Teachers collective bargaining
To serve as the bargaining agent for all graduate employees at the university of illinois-chicago and to create a culture of labor organizing among those graduate employees.
Improve the status of teachers, educational workers and other workers in the state of illinois.
Member representation in collective bargaining and related matters.
Collective Bargaining Representation
Represent over 450 teachers in collective bargaining agreements
We are a School Union that Represents that represents public school employees
Labor union
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Federation of Teachers Local No 1274 and the most unlike its peers is Ojai Federation of Teachers. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 59 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
70 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 70 of the 87 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds AMERICAN FEDERATION OF TEACHERS LOCAL 2961 ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FEDERATION OF TEACHERS ↗
- Who funds OHIO FEDERATION OF TEACHERS ↗
- Who funds PITTSBURGH FEDERATION OF TEACHERS ↗
- Who funds Jefferson Federation of Teachers AFT 1559 ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FEDERATION OF TEACHERS-PAWTUCKET ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FEDERATION OF TEACHERS 0780 ↗
- Who funds UNITED FEDERATION OF TEACHERS LOCAL 2 ↗
- Who funds HOUSTON FEDERATION OF TEACHERS ↗
- Who funds CHICAGO TEACHERS UNION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED TEACHERS OF DADE ↗
- Who funds United Educators of San Francisco ↗
- Who funds UNITED FEDERATION OF TEACHERS EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON TEACHERS UNION LOCAL #6 ↗
- Who funds FLORIDA EDUCATION ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds PINELLAS CLASSROOM TEACHERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds CINCINNATI FEDERATION OF TEACHERS INC ↗
- Who funds Edinburg American Federation of Teachers ↗
- Who funds THE ALBERT SHANKER INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FEDERATION OF TEACHERS ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FEDERATION OF TEACHERS 3037 2 BOCES II TEACHERS ASSOC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FEDERATION OF TEACHERS 4524 NATL COUNCIL-BUREAU OF INDIAN ↗
- Who funds BREVARD FEDERATION OF TEACHERS INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FEDERATION OF TEACHERS WHITE PLAINS LOCAL 3119 ↗
- Who funds EDUCATION MINNESOTA ↗
- Who funds AFT PENNSYLVANIA ↗
- Who funds UNITED TEACHERS OF LOWELL LOCAL 495 ↗
- Who funds ALBUQUERQUE TEACHERS FEDERATION ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FEDERATION OF TEACHERS NO 4632 ↗
- Who funds TEACHERS AFL-CIO LOCAL UNION 933 NEW HAVEN FEDERATION OF TEACHERS ↗
- Who funds RI FEDERATION OF TEACHERS - AFT ↗
- Who funds LEON CLASSROOM TEACHERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: National Education Association of the United States · New York State United Teachers · Aft Disaster Relief Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization American Federation of Teachers Educational Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.