Skip to content
Plinth
Funding

Massachusetts · Nonprofit

BOSTON TEACHERS UNION

BOSTON TEACHERS UNION (Massachusetts) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $392,454 to it, the largest being AFT MASSACHUSETTS ($367,454). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$13M
Revenue FY2025
2
Funders on record
$392k
Grants received
$23M
Net assets
1/2 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 1%

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($8.5M) Expenses 100 ($8.8M) Net assets 100 ($9.8M)2018 Revenue 111 ($9.4M) Expenses 98 ($8.6M) Net assets 108 ($11M)2019 Revenue 111 ($9.4M) Expenses 93 ($8.1M) Net assets 121 ($12M)2020 Revenue 118 ($10.0M) Expenses 95 ($8.3M) Net assets 141 ($14M)2021 Revenue 119 ($10M) Expenses 94 ($8.2M) Net assets 165 ($16M)2022 Revenue 121 ($10M) Expenses 113 ($9.9M) Net assets 153 ($15M)2023 Revenue 137 ($12M) Expenses 112 ($9.8M) Net assets 169 ($17M)2024 Revenue 150 ($13M) Expenses 117 ($10M) Net assets 205 ($20M)2025 Revenue 156 ($13M) Expenses 116 ($10M) Net assets 237 ($23M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (156)Expenses (116)Net assets (237)

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$286k
17
$826k
18
$1.3M
19
$1.7M
20
$1.8M
21
$316k
22
$1.8M
23
$2.5M
24
$3.1M
25
8.6
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2021 → 2023: the base narrowed from 2 funders to 1 funder, grant income fell $91k → $72k.

Funder
'21
'22
'23
'24*
'25*
total
funders
2
1
1
1
1

From the IRS filings of BOSTON TEACHERS UNION’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation.

How concentrated its funding is

BOSTON TEACHERS UNION leans on a few funders — its largest provides 94% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

94%
largest funder
100%
top three
~1
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2021 72% · 2022 100% · 2023 100%growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.

Where its funders are

94% of BOSTON TEACHERS UNION's grant income comes from Massachusetts funders.

MA
DC

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

21
22
23
Massachusetts out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like BOSTON TEACHERS UNION

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Massachusetts

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Governance

19
board members
0%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Footprint & structure

Part of a family of 4 related entities

  • Btu Health & Welfare Fund · exempt
  • Btu Prepaid Legal Services Fund · exempt
  • Btu Paraprofessional Health & Welfare Fund · exempt
  • Btuhwf Building Corp · exempt

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for BOSTON TEACHERS UNION: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds BOSTON TEACHERS UNION?
BOSTON TEACHERS UNION (Massachusetts) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $392,454 to it, the largest being AFT MASSACHUSETTS ($367,454). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does BOSTON TEACHERS UNION have?
IRS filings report 2 organizations giving $392,454 in grants to BOSTON TEACHERS UNION, 1 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of BOSTON TEACHERS UNION?
AFT MASSACHUSETTS is the largest funder on record, with $367,454 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like BOSTON TEACHERS UNION find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Massachusetts. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 2funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. What this page cannot tell you · view filing