Skip to content

· Public charity

American Committee for the Education and Welfare of Jews

The mission is to benefit an indefinite class of individuals who are either poor, distressed,and under privileged or come from broken homes.the organizaton activities include: financing the organization and operation of educational and religious projects in needy communities by subsidizing their capital and operating budgets,providing…

$937k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$425k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

International$2.0MReligion$1.4MEducation$986kHuman Services$9k
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 9 grants below total $885,845, the rows itemized in this filing. The $936,560 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $50,715 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k6 grants · $171k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $291k
  • $250k+1 grant · $425k
$37,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$401k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FEDERATION OF JEWISH COMMUNITIES$424,621
TIKVA$167,000
YAD YISROEL$123,584
CHAMAH INTERNATIONAL$43,900
VAAD HATZOLAS NIDCHEI YISROEL$37,500
MITZVA FOR UKRAINE$32,500
BEIS AHARON V'YISRAEL$27,500
RAJE-USA INC$18,000
SPARKS OF DAAS INC$11,240
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $27k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%RAJE-USA INC: $18k → 20%RAJE-USA INC: $9k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.9M · 12 repeat orgs$445k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +19% since the first grant, against +2% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
9

Total granted

$4.9M
$445k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+2%

Still filing today

75%
22%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’21’23’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’21’23’25
InternationalEducationReligionPublic BenefitHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YY
    YAD YISROEL
    7× · 2017–2025 · $2.0M · revenue +15%
  • TC
    TIKVA CORP
    7× · 2017–2025 · $1.2M · revenue +51%
  • VL
    VAAD L 'HATZOLAS NIDCHEI YISROEL INC
    7× · 2017–2025 · $398k · revenue +24% · 28% of their budget

Funded once

  • JC
    JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF MOSCOW
    one grant, 2023 · $200k
  • FO
    FUND OF RUSSIAN SPEAKING JEWS INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $101k
  • CO
    CONGREGATION ORACH CHAIM
    one grant, 2021 · $60k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Friends of Yeshiva Aish Hatorah
—
2
Eastern European Jewish Heritage Foundation
Philanthropy
3
Friends of Kishinev Jewry

To provide religious Jewish education to Kishinev Jewry

Religion
4
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
5
American Friends of Yeshivat Hakotel Inc

To support religious, charitable, scientific, literary and/or educational programs

Education
6
American Friends of Amshinover Yeshiva Jerusalem Inc

Support of religious schools in Israel

International
7
Friends of Kharkov Jewish Community Inc

To facilitate and provide support for Jewish religious, educational, as well as charitable activities in Kharkov, Ukraine, for its Jewish community and for its refugees.

International
8
Jewish Center of Ulyanovsk Inc

To aid the poor and beedy with food, clothing abd spiritual gudiance

Religion
9
American Friends of Yeshivat Nachalat Yossef

The organization will provide financial assistance to educational institutions that promote the observance of the jewish religion, its laws and traditions, and sacred texts, including yeshivat nachalat yossef, located in jerusalem, israel.

Religion
10
University of Judaism Foundation
—
11
American Friends of Beit Yaakov Ko Tomar

Promotion of orthodox jewish education.

Philanthropy
12
American Friends of Tiferet David- Ostrova Inc

American friends of Tiferet David-Ostrova Biale's purpose is to support the charitable and communal efforts of the Ostrova Biala Rebbed Avidshlit'a in Israel and in the United States.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Friends of the Kiev Jewish Community; the most unlike its peers is Sparks of Daas Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/14
Grantees still filing
9/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

YAD YISROEL: $1,981,669 · OtherYAD YISROELOPERATION OPEN CURTAIN - GEMILAS CHESED FOR RUSSIAN JEWS: $231,665 · OtherOPERATION OPEN CURTAIN - GEMILAS CHESED FOR RUSSIAN JEWSJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF MOSCOW: $200,000 · OtherJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF MOSCOWCHAMAH: $105,200 · OtherFUND OF RUSSIAN SPEAKING JEWS INC: $100,971 · Other+6 more: $113,063 · OtherTIKVA CORP: $1,153,150 · EducationTIKVA CORPSPARKS OF DAAS INC: $51,710 · EducationFederation of Jewish Communities of Ukraine INC: $432,771 · ReligionFederation of Jew…VAAD L 'HATZOLAS NIDCHEI YISROEL INC: $397,954 · ReligionVAAD L 'HATZOLAS …AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THORAT CHAJM INC: $218,000 · InternationalAMERICAN …AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE KIEV JEWISH COMMUNITY: $138,517 · InternationalAMERICAN …AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ANATEVKA INC: $65,740 · InternationalAMERICAN …The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc: $17,500 · InternationalBeis Aharon VYisroel Inc DBA American Friends of Here Next Year: $89,621 · Public BenefitRAJE-USA INC: $27,000 · Human ServicesAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MESHI INC: $20,000 · Philanthropy
Other$2,732,568Education$1,204,860Religion$830,725International$439,757Public Benefit$89,621Human Services$27,000Philanthropy$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYAD YISROEL: $1,981,669 over 7y, 22% of budgetTIKVA CORP: $1,153,150 over 7y, 14% of budgetFederation of Jewish Communities of Ukraine INC: $432,771 over 2y, 26% of budgetVAAD L 'HATZOLAS NIDCHEI YISROEL INC: $397,954 over 7y, 28% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THORAT CHAJM INC: $218,000 over 6y, 23% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE KIEV JEWISH COMMUNITY: $138,517 over 5y, 2.7% of budgetBeis Aharon VYisroel Inc DBA American Friends of Here Next Year: $89,621 over 2y, 19% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ANATEVKA INC: $65,740 over 2y, 4.6% of budgetSPARKS OF DAAS INC: $51,710 over 3y, 3.6% of budgetRAJE-USA INC: $27,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MESHI INC: $20,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc: $17,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAGUDATH ISRAEL OF AMERICA: $6,998 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds YAD YISROEL ↗
  • Who funds TIKVA CORP ↗
  • Who funds Federation of Jewish Communities of Ukraine INC ↗
  • Who funds VAAD L 'HATZOLAS NIDCHEI YISROEL INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THORAT CHAJM INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE KIEV JEWISH COMMUNITY ↗
  • Who funds FUND OF RUSSIAN SPEAKING JEWS INC ↗
  • Who funds Beis Aharon VYisroel Inc DBA American Friends of Here Next Year ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ANATEVKA INC ↗
  • Who funds SPARKS OF DAAS INC ↗
  • Who funds RAJE-USA INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MESHI INC ↗
  • Who funds The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc ↗
  • Who funds AGUDATH ISRAEL OF AMERICA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundNY23.5× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Jewish Communal Fund · Alyad Foundation Inc · Agudath Israel of America · Associated Jewish Charities of Baltimore · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · The Koum Family Foundation · Partners in Giving Inc · Morasha Olami Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization American Committee for the Education and Welfare of Jews funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from American Committee for the Education and Welfare of Jews. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to American Committee for the Education and Welfare of Jews?

    Find your warmest path to American Committee for the Education and Welfare of Jews through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on American Committee for the Education and Welfare of Jews’ filings →

    More from the funding graph