How much did AMERICAN BEVERAGE FOUNDATION FOR A grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 70% of AMERICAN BEVERAGE FOUNDATION FOR A’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

—

2019

bed stuystuy againstgreenagainst hunger

2020

keepbeautifulagainst hungerhealth

2021

keepbeautiful

2022

—

2023

hungermayors

2024

mayors

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k3 grants · $12k
$10k–50k9 grants · $150k
$50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$250k+2 grants · $1.3M

$12,500

Median grant

States reached

$1.5M

Total assets

Largest grants

UNITED STATES CONFERENCE OF MAYORS$745,000
AFRICAN AMERICAN MAYORS ASSOCIATION$600,000
HIP HOP PUBLIC HEALTH INC$50,000
THE CAMPAIGN AGAINST HUNGER$25,000
CARE FOR THE CAPE & ISLANDS INC$25,000
OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$25,000
CHILDRENS HOME SOCIETY OF FLORIDA$15,000
GROUNDS KREWE NOLA INC$12,500
HOUSE FACTORY FOUNDATION$12,500
FRIENDS OF THE UNDERLINE INC$12,500
CLEAN MIAMI BEACH$12,000
ALASKANS FOR LITTER PREVENTION AND RECY$10,000
ROBESON KIWANIS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION$5,000
PALMETTOPRIDE$5,000
SCHOOL BOARD OF ORANGE COUNTY FLORIDA$1,750

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $562k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17% — the area typically sits at 11%. 96% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

62%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$4.4M · 10 repeat orgs$2.7M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +469% since the first grant, against +92% for the ones you funded once.

10 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$4.4M

$2.6M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+469%

+92%

Still filing today

60%

46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $136k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

EnvironmentHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementYouth DevelopmentEducationPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

AA
AFRICAN AMERICAN MAYORS ASSOCIATION
2× · 2023–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +559%
HH
HIP HOP PUBLIC HEALTH INC
6× · 2017–2024 · $310k · revenue +524% · 43% of their budget
TC
THE CAMPAIGN AGAINST HUNGER
4× · 2018–2024 · $200k · revenue +261%

Funded once

US
UNITED STATES CONFERENCE OF MAYORS
one grant, 2018 · $1.8M
BA
BARRIO ACTION YOUTH AND FAMILY
one grant, 2020 · $50k
KA
KEEP ALABAMA BEAUTIFUL
one grant, 2021 · $29k · revenue +22%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Fresh Coast Communities

To get the most good out of green infrastructure. Every community deserves the full benefits of green infrastructure, so Greenprint Communities helps local organizations build capacity and secure grant funding for programs that maximize…

Environment

Keep Lee County Beautiful Inc

The mission of Keep Lee County Beautiful, Inc. is to inspire, educate, and engage the Lee County community in improving, beautifying, and protecting our environment.

Environment

Green Cities Accord

Green Cities Accord is a nonprofit organization dedicated to fostering climate resilient communities through investments in tree canopy infrastructure to improve environmental health, climate resilience, and equity in communities. We focus…

Environment

The Urban Conservancy

Founded in 2001, The Urban Conservancy is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization dedicated to research, education and advocacy that promotes the wise stewardship of the urban built environment and local economies.

Community Improvement

Biscayne Bay Waterkeeper Inc

In 2024, biscayne bay waterkeeper (d/b/a miami waterkeeper) built on our reputation by navigating challenges, seizing opportunities, and continuing our unwavering commitment to safeguarding our precious waterways and finding local…

Environment

Mobile Baykeeper Inc

Provide citizens a means to protect the beauty, health and heritage of the Mobile Bay Watershed, Alabamas waterways and coastal communities.

Environment

Green Columbus

Green Columbus is a volunteer-driven nonprofit seeking to improve equitable environmental outcomes for the people of Central Ohio.

Environment

Sustainable Coastlines Hawai'i

The reduction of pollution on coastlines through large scale beach cleanups and education to inspire better consumer behaviors and continued coastal stewardship.

Environment

Conservation Florida Inc

Conservation florida's mission is to protect florida's natural and agricultural landscapes for future generations.

Environment

Keep Pensacola Beautiful Inc

The mission of Keep Pensacola Beautiful Inc is to work strategically with community partners to educate and advocate, implementing programs that advance the environmental quality and beauty of our community.

Environment

Community Greening Corp

Community Greening envisions an engaged community creating sustainable green spaces and a vibrant tree canopy to equitably strengthen our environment, economy, society and health.

Environment

Georgia Tree Council Inc

To sustain georgia's green legacy by partnering with individuals, organizations, and communities in raising awareness toward improving and maintaining georgia's community forests.

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Keep Florida Beautiful Inc and the most unlike its peers is Mary's Center for Maternal and Child Care Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 18 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

2%1/45

the rest of the field

11%

206,163/1,819,520

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

40 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

39/40

Grantees still filing

32/40

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$5,028,200Community Improvement$1,196,500Human Services$562,400Environment$164,704Philanthropy$86,200Education$59,633Youth Development$34,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Keep America Beautiful IncCT19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Keep America Beautiful Inc · AARP · Annie E Casey Foundation Inc · Greater Washington Community Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation AMERICAN BEVERAGE FOUNDATION FOR A funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

8get no government money at all

1rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: HIP HOP PUBLIC HEALTH INC.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

medium risk

~4 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 6.2× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 800722635 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on HIP HOP PUBLIC HEALTH INC, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

WatchFinancial stability— Roughly 4 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 43% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to American Beverage Foundation for A?

Find your warmest path to American Beverage Foundation for A through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

AMERICAN BEVERAGE FOUNDATION FOR A

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

40 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to American Beverage Foundation for A?

More from the funding graph

AMERICAN BEVERAGE FOUNDATION FOR A

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

40 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to American Beverage Foundation for A?

More from the funding graph