Skip to content
American Academy of Sleep Medicine at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

American Academy of Sleep Medicine

The AMERICAN ACADEMY OF SLEEP MEDICINE (aasm) is a nonprofit corporation organized under the laws of the state of minnesota to (1) establish, update, and maintain standards for the evaluation and treatment of human sleep disorders and sleep-related disorders, (2) promote education and training in sleep disorder medicine and to foster…

$640k
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
11
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$12MEducation$352kEnvironment$190kPublic Safety & Disaster$20k
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k5 grants · $78k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $550k
$50,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$107M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TEMPLE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL$100,000
LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER$100,000
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES$50,300
JFK UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER$50,000
UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER$50,000
UNIVERSITY OF UTAH$50,000
EMORY UNIVERSITY$50,000
DARTMOUTH HITCHCOCK MEDICAL CENTER$50,000
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA$50,000
RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER$27,896
STANFORD UNIVERSITY$20,000
EASTERN VIRGINIA MEDICAL SCHOOL$10,000
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL LOS ANGELES$10,000
UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 6% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MAYO CLINIC: $27k → 9%TEMPLE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL: $100k → 22%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $40k → 7%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $20k → 8%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL LOS ANGELES: $10k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $50k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF UTAH: $50k → 8%EMORY UNIVERSITY: $50k → 14%INDIANA UNIVERSITY: $10k → 16%AMERICAN ACADEMY OF SLEEP MEDICINE FOUNDATION: $4.0M → 7%RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER: $80k → 14%JFK UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER: $50k → 8%DAKOTA SLEEP SOCIETY: $6k → 12%EASTERN VIRGINIA MEDICAL SCHOOL: $10k → 19%LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER: $100k → 23%DARTMOUTH HITCHCOCK MEDICAL CENTER: $50k → 10%TEMPLE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL: $100k → 22%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $12k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES: $50k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $50k → 14%EMORY UNIVERSITY: $50k → 14%AMERICAN ACADEMY OF SLEEP MEDICINE FOUNDATION: $2.1M → 7%RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER: $28k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $50k → 14%AMERICAN ACADEMY OF SLEEP MEDICINE FOUNDATION: $2.0M → 7%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES: $40k → 14%AMERICAN SLEEP MEDICINE FOUNDATION: $2.0M → 7%AMERICAN ALLIANCE FOR HEALTHY SLEEP: $1.0M → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
ND
MN
IL
NY
IA
IN
PA
NJ
CA
UT
NE
VA
LA
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$11M · 11 repeat orgs$1.2M to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
4

Total granted

$11M
$1.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+46%

Still filing today

73%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $110k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’23’24
HealthEducationHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AA
    AMERICAN ACADEMY OF SLEEP MEDICINE FOUNDATION
    4× · 2017–2020 · $10M · revenue +36% · 88% of their budget
  • TU
    Temple University Hospital Inc
    2× · 2023–2024 · $200k · revenue +32%
  • RU
    Rush University Medical Center
    2× · 2023–2024 · $108k · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • AA
    AMERICAN ALLIANCE FOR HEALTHY SLEEP
    one grant, 2017 · $1.0M · revenue -100% · 100% of their budget
  • MC
    MAYO CLINIC
    one grant, 2017 · $27k
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branchesgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue +46%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
2
Thomas Jefferson University

Thomas jefferson university ("tju") is a comprehensive university with preeminence in transdisciplinary, experiential professional education, research and discovery, delivering exceptional value for the 21st century students with…

Education
3
Truman Medical Center Incorporated

University health is an academic health center providing accessible, state-of-the-art quality healthcare to our community regardless of the ability to pay.

Health
4
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
5
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
6
Sutter Bay Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
7
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
8
University of Chicago Medical Center

Our mission at the university of chicago medicine is to provide superior health care through rigorous research, innovative education, and comprehensive care and healing. in partnership with our colleagues, we pursue life-changing…

Health
9
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
10
Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Vanderbilt University Medical Center (VUMC) is one of the nation's longest serving and most prestigious academic medical centers. Through its historic bond with Vanderbilt University, VUMC cultivates distinguished research and educational…

Health
11
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
12
Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary

THE MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY ("THE INFIRMARY") IS A NOT-FOR-PROFIT TEACHING HOSPITAL CONDUCTING PATIENT CARE AND RESEARCH. THE INFIRMARY IS A TEACHING HOSPITAL OF HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL AND AN INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH.…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center; the most unlike its peers is Temple University Hospital Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
10/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AMERICAN ACADEMY OF SLEEP MEDICINE FOUNDATION: $10,081,000 · HealthAMERICAN ACADEMY OF SLEEP MEDICINE FOUNDATION+7 more: $543,501 · HealthAMERICAN ALLIANCE FOR HEALTHY SLEEP: $1,000,000 · OtherAMERICAN ALL…LSU HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER - NEW ORLEANS: $100,000 · OtherLSU HEALTH S…UNIVERSITY OF UTAH: $100,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY O…REGENTS UNIV OF CALIFORNIA: $90,300 · OtherREGENTS UNIV…+3 more: $56,850 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $100,000 · EducationEmory University: $100,000 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $72,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $50,000 · EducationAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $20,000 · Human Services
Health$10,624,501Other$1,347,150Education$322,000Human Services$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN ACADEMY OF SLEEP MEDICINE FOUNDATION: $10,081,000 over 4y, 88% of budgetAMERICAN ALLIANCE FOR HEALTHY SLEEP: $1,000,000 over 1y, 100% of budgetTemple University Hospital Inc: $200,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRush University Medical Center: $107,896 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $100,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center: $100,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetEmory University: $100,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $72,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Nebraska Medical Center: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDakota Medical Foundation: $5,605 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …
Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO4.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization American Academy of Sleep Medicine funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from American Academy of Sleep Medicine. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on American Academy of Sleep Medicine’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home