Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

American Academy of Sleep Medicine

The AMERICAN ACADEMY OF SLEEP MEDICINE (aasm) is a nonprofit corporation organized under the laws of the state of minnesota to (1) establish, update, and maintain standards for the evaluation and treatment of human sleep disorders and sleep-related disorders, (2) promote education and training in sleep disorder medicine and to foster…

$640k
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
11
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Health$12MEducation$352kEnvironment$190kPublic Safety & Disaster$20k
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k5 grants · $78k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $550k
$50,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$107M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TEMPLE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL$100,000
LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER$100,000
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES$50,300
JFK UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER$50,000
UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER$50,000
UNIVERSITY OF UTAH$50,000
EMORY UNIVERSITY$50,000
DARTMOUTH HITCHCOCK MEDICAL CENTER$50,000
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA$50,000
RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER$27,896
STANFORD UNIVERSITY$20,000
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL LOS ANGELES$10,000
EASTERN VIRGINIA MEDICAL SCHOOL$10,000
UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 6% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MAYO CLINIC: $27k → 9%TEMPLE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL: $100k → 22%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $40k → 7%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $20k → 8%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL LOS ANGELES: $10k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $50k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF UTAH: $50k → 8%EMORY UNIVERSITY: $50k → 14%INDIANA UNIVERSITY: $10k → 16%AMERICAN ACADEMY OF SLEEP MEDICINE FOUNDATION: $4.0M → 7%RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER: $80k → 14%JFK UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER: $50k → 8%DAKOTA SLEEP SOCIETY: $6k → 12%EASTERN VIRGINIA MEDICAL SCHOOL: $10k → 19%LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER: $100k → 23%DARTMOUTH HITCHCOCK MEDICAL CENTER: $50k → 10%TEMPLE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL: $100k → 22%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $12k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES: $50k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $50k → 14%EMORY UNIVERSITY: $50k → 14%AMERICAN ACADEMY OF SLEEP MEDICINE FOUNDATION: $2.1M → 7%RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER: $28k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $50k → 14%AMERICAN ACADEMY OF SLEEP MEDICINE FOUNDATION: $2.0M → 7%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES: $40k → 14%AMERICAN SLEEP MEDICINE FOUNDATION: $2.0M → 7%AMERICAN ALLIANCE FOR HEALTHY SLEEP: $1.0M → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NH
ND
MN
IL
NY
IA
IN
PA
NJ
CA
UT
NE
VA
LA
GA

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$11M · 11 repeat orgs$1.2M to everyone else

11 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
4

Total granted

$11M
$1.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+46%

Still filing today

73%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $110k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’23’24
HealthEducationHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AA
    AMERICAN ACADEMY OF SLEEP MEDICINE FOUNDATION
    4× · 2017–2020 · $10M · revenue +36% · 88% of their budget
  • TU
    Temple University Hospital Inc
    2× · 2023–2024 · $200k · revenue +32%
  • RU
    Rush University Medical Center
    2× · 2023–2024 · $108k · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • AA
    AMERICAN ALLIANCE FOR HEALTHY SLEEP
    one grant, 2017 · $1.0M · revenue -100% · 100% of their budget
  • MC
    MAYO CLINIC
    one grant, 2017 · $27k
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branchesgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue +46%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
2
Thomas Jefferson University

Thomas jefferson university ("tju") is a comprehensive university with preeminence in transdisciplinary, experiential professional education, research and discovery, delivering exceptional value for the 21st century students with…

Education
3
Truman Medical Center Incorporated

University health is an academic health center providing accessible, state-of-the-art quality healthcare to our community regardless of the ability to pay.

Health
4
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
5
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
6
Sutter Bay Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
7
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
8
University of Chicago Medical Center

Our mission at the university of chicago medicine is to provide superior health care through rigorous research, innovative education, and comprehensive care and healing. in partnership with our colleagues, we pursue life-changing…

Health
9
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
10
Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Vanderbilt University Medical Center (VUMC) is one of the nation's longest serving and most prestigious academic medical centers. Through its historic bond with Vanderbilt University, VUMC cultivates distinguished research and educational…

Health
11
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
12
Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary

THE MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY ("THE INFIRMARY") IS A NOT-FOR-PROFIT TEACHING HOSPITAL CONDUCTING PATIENT CARE AND RESEARCH. THE INFIRMARY IS A TEACHING HOSPITAL OF HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL AND AN INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH.…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center and the most unlike its peers is Temple University Hospital Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
11/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

AMERICAN ACADEMY OF SLEEP MEDICINE FOUNDATION — $10,081,000 · HealthAMERICAN ACADEMY OF SLEEP MEDICINE FOUNDATION+7 more — $543,501 · HealthAMERICAN ALLIANCE FOR HEALTHY SLEEP — $1,000,000 · OtherAMERICAN ALL…UNIVERSITY OF UTAH — $100,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY O…LSU HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER - NEW ORLEANS — $100,000 · OtherLSU HEALTH S…REGENTS UNIV OF CALIFORNIA — $90,300 · OtherREGENTS UNIV…+3 more — $56,850 · OtherEmory University — $100,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER — $100,000 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $72,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $50,000 · EducationAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $20,000 · Human Services
Health$10,624,501Other$1,347,150Education$322,000Human Services$20,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAMERICAN ACADEMY OF SLEEP MEDICINE FOUNDATION — $10,081,000 over 4y, 88% of budgetAMERICAN ALLIANCE FOR HEALTHY SLEEP — $1,000,000 over 1y, 100% of budgetTemple University Hospital Inc — $200,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRush University Medical Center — $107,896 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center — $100,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetEmory University — $100,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER — $100,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $72,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Nebraska Medical Center — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDakota Medical Foundation — $5,605 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO4.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization American Academy of Sleep Medicine funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph