Skip to content

· Private foundation

Amber Oak Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$167k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Religion$1.6MEducation$205kFood & Nutrition$88kHuman Services$71kPublic Safety & Disaster$37kHealth$8kHousing & Shelter$2kCivil Rights$2k
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $54k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $100k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$4.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST AUGUSTINES CATHOLIC CENTER$50,000
ST MARYS CATHOLIC CHURCH$50,000
FOCUS EVANGELIZATION FOUNDATION$18,000
ST MARYS CATHOLIC CHURCH OF POTLATCH$16,000
ST MARYS CATHOLIC CHURCH$10,000
CHILDREN OF THE IMMACULATE HEART$10,000
ST MARYS CATHOLIC CHURCH$8,000
POTLATCH FOOD PANTRY$4,000
PALOUSE CARE NETWORK INC$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%TRULIGHT127 MINISTRIES INC: $11k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
IL
WI
NY
OH
CA
CO
NE
VA
MD
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 7% of Amber Oak Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Amber Oak Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 6.9% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

30%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$587k · 9 repeat orgs$1.4M to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
10

Total granted

$587k
$1.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-14%
+9%

Still filing today

22%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesHealthCivil RightsInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SA
    ST AUGUSTINES CATHOLIC CENTER
    5× · 2020–2024 · $167k
  • SM
    ST MARYS CATHOLIC CHURCH
    4× · 2020–2024 · $130k
  • SM
    ST MARYS CATHOLIC CHURCH OF POTLATCH
    5× · 2020–2024 · $107k

Funded once

  • SJ
    ST JOAN OF ARC CATHOLIC CHURCH
    one grant, 2020 · $1.0M
  • GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITYgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $200k · revenue +34%
  • OL
    OUR LADY OF GUADALUPE SEMINARY
    one grant, 2020 · $100k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Catholic Answers Inc

Catholic answers is an apostolate dedicated to serving christ by bringing the fullness of catholic truth to the world. we help good catholics become better catholics, bring former catholics home, and lead non-catholics into the fullness of…

—
2
Priests for Life
Youth Development
3
Life Network

Life Network provides support and mentoring to women and men facing unexpected pregnancies; offers parenting support, material resources, and referrals; and promotes sexual risk avoidance through education to foster a culture that values…

Health
4
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
5
Passionlife Ministries Inc

Passionlife ministries is a global missions initiative to spread the gospel of life and expand the pregnancy help movement among nations plagued by abortion, infanticide and gendercide.

Religion
6
Mercy Health

Mercy Health will provide assistance, support and direction to all of the health care institutions and activities operated and maintained by its Subsidiaries. The mission of Mercy Health in performing these activities shall be to provide a…

—
7
Catholics for Choice

Catholics for Choice - which serves the pro-choice Catholic majority - encounters, educates, and emboldens people of faith who support reproductive freedom. Catholics for Choice believes healthcare is a human right and that includes access…

Civil Rights
8
Amnion Women's Center

Amnion's mission is to share the gospel of jesus christ and to protect and advocate for the sanctity of all human life, born and unborn, through the provision of abortion alternative services that empower mothers to choose life.

Health
9
New Life Solutions Inc

To protect the unborn, share the gospel, and transform our communities one life at a time.

Health
10
Faith in Public Life Inc

Faith in public life's mission is to advance the moral imperative for a just, inclusive and equitable country that allows each of us to live into our full humanity. we do this by building power and cultures of belongings among diverse…

Religion
11
A Choice for Life Inc

Bsideu for life is committed to presenting the gospel of our lord in word and deed by educating women facing crisis pregnancies, responding to their needs and protecting the lives of unborn children.bsideu for life also equips mothers and…

—
12
Align Life Ministries

To share the gospel of jesus christ and the sacredness of human life through pregnancy services, strategic partnerships, and equipping resources

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is 40 Days for Life; the most unlike its peers is Palouse Care Network Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
3/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST JOAN OF ARC CATHOLIC CHURCH: $1,000,000 · OtherST JOAN OF ARC CATHOLIC CHURCHST AUGUSTINES CATHOLIC CENTER: $166,945 · OtherST AUGUSTINES CATHOLIC CENTERST MARYS CATHOLIC CHURCH: $130,250 · OtherST MARYS CATHOLIC CHURCHST MARYS CATHOLIC CHURCH OF POTLATCH: $106,665 · OtherST MARYS CATHOLIC CHURCH OF POTLATCHOUR LADY OF GUADALUPE SEMINARY: $100,000 · OtherOUR LADY OF GUADALUPE SEMINARY+8 more: $232,274 · Other+8 moreGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $200,000 · EducationGEORGETOWN …+1 more: $3,000 · EducationTRULIGHT 127 MINISTRIES INC: $11,150 · Human ServicesChildren of the Immaculate Heart: $10,000 · Human ServicesPALOUSE CARE NETWORK INC: $7,575 · HealthLIVE ACTION: $2,000 · Civil RightsFOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $1,000 · International
Other$1,736,134Education$203,000Human Services$21,150Health$7,575Civil Rights$2,000International$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $200,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COMING HOME NETWORK INTERNATIONAL: $36,733 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetTRULIGHT 127 MINISTRIES INC: $11,150 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetChildren of the Immaculate Heart: $10,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetPALOUSE CARE NETWORK INC: $7,575 over 3y, 0.4% of budget40 DAYS FOR LIFE: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIVE ACTION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDISMAS MINISTRY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE COMING HOME NETWORK INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds TRULIGHT 127 MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds Children of the Immaculate Heart ↗
  • Who funds PALOUSE CARE NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds 40 DAYS FOR LIFE ↗
  • Who funds LIVE ACTION ↗
  • Who funds DISMAS MINISTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOD FOR THE POOR INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Endowment FoundationOH8.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Endowment Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Amber Oak Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Amber Oak Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Food for the Poor Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Amber Oak’s filings →

More from the funding graph