Skip to content

· Private foundation

Alyad Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$151k
Granted FY2025still arriving
150
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$27k
Largest
01What it funds
0183% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$502kReligion$431kArts & Culture$155kHealth$40kInternational$40kHuman Services$23kEducation$15kFood & Nutrition$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 150 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k146 grants · $81k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $70k
$280
Median grant
7
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SHOR YOSHUV$27,385
UNITED HATZALAH$20,500
CONGREGATION KHAL CHASDEI SKWERE$12,500
HEBREW ACADEMY OF LONG BEACH$10,045
CONGREGATION KNESETH ISRAEL$9,592
CONGREGATION YALDI KODESH$5,000
FRIENDS OF MEIR PANIM$4,770
YESHIVAT LEV HATORAH$4,100
CHESED 247$3,160
CHAI LIFELINE$2,800
Individual grant recipient$1,980
CONGREGATION YESHIVA OF KINGS BAY$1,800
Individual grant recipient$1,800
RCCS$1,620
CHIZUK HATORAH$1,548
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $37k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 77% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CHAZACK: $36 → 9%YAD CHAYA: $2k → 13%VAAD HATZEDAKA INC: $1k → 15%TCF AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER: $3k → 11%YAD CHAYA: $1k → 13%TSEDAKA CENTER INC: $1k → 15%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER: $850 → 11%GEMACH OF JACKSON: $594 → 11%KOLLEL RASHBI ARI FOUNDATION: $36 → 14%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER: $500 → 11%SMILES THROUGH CARS: $500 → 6%GEMACH OF JACKSON: $350 → 11%YAD CHAYA: $584 → 13%KEREN HATZEDAKA: $144 → 11%JEWISH UNION FOUNDATION: $5k → 17%ISRAEL SELECT CHARITY FUND: $603 → 14%BRIDGES CHILDREN NY INC: $180 → 20%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF KESHER YEHUDI INC: $180 → 6%BIKUR CHOLIM OF LAKEWOOD INC: $360 → 11%CHAI4EVER: $360 → 11%CHABAD LUBAVITCH TORAH EDUCATIONAL SERVICES: $252 → 20%AHAVAS TZEDAKOS: $198 → 11%KEREN HATZEDAKA: $190 → 11%BIKUR CHOLIM OF LAKEWOOD: $180 → 11%KULANU ACADEMY: $1k → 17%KULANU ACADEMY: $1k → 17%CHEVRA GEMACH: $360 → 6%KEREN HATZEDAKA: $79 → 11%AHAVAS TZEDAKA: $50 → 11%KEREN ANIYIM: $2k → 20%KEREN ANIYIM: $1k → 20%KEREN ANIYIM: $360 → 20%DAVIS MEMORIAL FUND: $3k → 6%AL KANFEI NISHARM: $1k → 6%KUPAT GIVAT HAMIVTAR: $875 → 6%DAVIS MEMORIAL FUND: $720 → 6%DAVIS MEMORIAL FUND: $500 → 6%DAVIS MEMORIAL FUND: $369 → 6%ACHIEZER COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER: $360 → 6%ACHIEZER COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER: $360 → 6%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF TORAT MOSHE: $360 → 20%ACHDUS FOUNDATION: $54 → 20%A TIME: $1k → 20%A TIME: $720 → 20%A TIME: $560 → 20%A TIME: $360 → 20%CHEDVAS HATORAH: $360 → 20%HAMASPIK OF KINGS COUNTY INC: $68 → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
MT
IL
MI
NY
MA
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
MO
VA
MD
AZ
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.0M · 128 repeat orgs$227k to everyone else

128 repeat relationships: 60 still active in FY2025, 68 since wound down; 86 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

128
300

Total granted

$1.0M
$185k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
0%

Still filing today

38%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $42k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’22’23’24’25
ReligionHuman ServicesPhilanthropyInternationalEducationHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $152k · revenue +63%
  • CH
    CAMP HASC INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $5k · revenue +43%
  • TS
    Torat Shraga Inc
    2× · 2022–2023 · $5k · revenue +17%

Funded once

  • HO
    HATZALAH OF THE FIVE TOWNS AND ROCKAWAYS
    one grant, 2022 · $30k
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF MICHLALAH YERUSHALAYIM INC
    one grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue 0%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sherit Isroel
—
2
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
3
American Friends of Yeshiva Aish Hatorah
—
4
Keren Yaakov Ben Menachen Tzvi Foundation
Philanthropy
5
Tomchei Torah Inc

Religious Teaching

—
6
Chasdei Dovid Elimelech Inc
Philanthropy
7
Shaarei Halacha Inc
Philanthropy
8
Tal Hashamayim Foundation
Religion
9
Gemilas Chesed Kramer Inc
Philanthropy
10
Tzemach Yifroch Foundation
—
11
Ahavas Torah V'chesed
Philanthropy
12
Zichron Chaim Avraham Foundation
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feed Israel Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Dirshu International Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

165 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 165 of the 519 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
21
Early backer (in before they grew)
157/165
Grantees still filing
65/165
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST: $491,049 · OtherAVAILABLE UPON REQUESTSHOR YOSHUV: $90,505 · OtherSHOR YOSHUVCONGREGATION KHAL CHASIDEI SKWERA INC: $48,100 · OtherHEBREW ACADEMY OF LONG BEACH: $47,835 · Other+130 more: $278,135 · Other+130 moreFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $151,940 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF UNI…JEWISH UNION FOUNDATION INC: $5,100 · Human ServicesDAVIS MEMORIAL FUND INC: $4,758 · Human ServicesAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER: $4,070 · Human ServicesYAD CHAYA INC: $4,044 · Human ServicesKEREN ANIYIM INC: $3,240 · Human ServicesA Torah Infertilty Medium Exchange: $3,120 · Human ServicesKULANU ACADEMY INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesVaad Hatzedaka Inc: $1,379 · Human Services+11 more: $7,492 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF MICHLALAH YERUSHALAYIM INC: $24,500 · PhilanthropyROFEH CHOLIM CANCER SOCIETY INC: $2,867 · PhilanthropyKupa Shel Tzedakah Inc: $1,899 · Philanthropy+5 more: $2,957 · PhilanthropyCAMP HASC INC: $5,468 · ReligionTOMCHEI TZEDAKA CORP: $3,250 · ReligionKEREN HASHVIIS INC: $1,496 · ReligionTHE ISRAEL ALLIANCE: $1,090 · ReligionAMERICAN FRIENDS OF OHEV YISRAEL: $720 · Religion+11 more: $5,048 · ReligionAmerican Friends of Yeshivat Lev Hatorah: $5,000 · EducationTHE LEVI YITZCHAK FAMILY CENTER INC: $2,260 · EducationCATSKILLS HATZALAH INC: $1,860 · EducationMEOR INC: $1,508 · EducationGSD Advisers Inc: $1,134 · EducationESTHER MILLER BAIS YAAKOV HIGH SCHOOL OF ST LOUIS: $896 · EducationAM YISRAEL CHAI FOUNDATION INC: $850 · EducationFriends of Rachashei Lev Whispers of The Heart: $750 · Education+4 more: $1,697 · EducationTorat Shraga Inc: $4,773 · InternationalKULANU INC: $2,000 · InternationalAdi Israel Foundation Inc: $1,980 · InternationalECHO Inc: $1,625 · InternationalCentral Fund of Israel: $1,440 · InternationalGush Etzion Foundation % Juliette Landesman: $720 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF RAMAT BET SHEMESH INC: $715 · InternationalYAD EZRA V'SHULAMIT: $540 · International+2 more: $831 · International
Other$955,624Arts & Culture$151,940Human Services$35,203Philanthropy$32,223Religion$17,072Education$15,955International$14,624

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $151,940 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF MICHLALAH YERUSHALAYIM INC: $24,500 over 1y, 7.9% of budgetKIDS OF COURAGE INC: $14,551 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetSOLDIERS SAVE LIVES CORPORATION: $5,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCAMP HASC INC: $5,468 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH UNION FOUNDATION INC: $5,100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Friends of Yeshivat Lev Hatorah: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTorat Shraga Inc: $4,773 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetDAVIS MEMORIAL FUND INC: $4,758 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER: $4,070 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetYAD CHAYA INC: $4,044 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTOMCHEI TZEDAKA CORP: $3,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetKEREN ANIYIM INC: $3,240 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC: $3,210 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetA Torah Infertilty Medium Exchange: $3,120 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetROFEH CHOLIM CANCER SOCIETY INC: $2,867 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LEVI YITZCHAK FAMILY CENTER INC: $2,260 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetAMUDIM COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKULANU ACADEMY INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKULANU INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAdi Israel Foundation Inc: $1,980 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MEIR PANIM: $1,970 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKupa Shel Tzedakah Inc: $1,899 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCATSKILLS HATZALAH INC: $1,860 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHEVRA HATZALAH OF THE ROCKAWAYS AND NASSAU COUNTY: $1,800 over 1y, 7.9% of budgetAmerican Friends of Migdal OHR: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetECHO Inc: $1,625 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetISRAEL CHILDRENS CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $1,564 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMEOR INC: $1,508 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetKEREN HASHVIIS INC: $1,496 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCentral Fund of Israel: $1,440 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY COUNCIL OF THE ROCKAWAY PENINSULA INC C/O RACHEL BRYKS: $1,430 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGSD Advisers Inc: $1,134 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ISRAEL ALLIANCE: $1,090 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAl Kanfei Nisharim Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetGEMACH OF JACKSON INC: $944 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetESTHER MILLER BAIS YAAKOV HIGH SCHOOL OF ST LOUIS: $896 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKUPAT GIVAT HAMIVTAR: $875 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAM YISRAEL CHAI FOUNDATION INC: $850 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFriends of Rachashei Lev Whispers of The Heart: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGush Etzion Foundation % Juliette Landesman: $720 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF OHEV YISRAEL: $720 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetACHIEZER COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER INC: $720 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF RAMAT BET SHEMESH INC: $715 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFEED ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $697 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $610 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetIsrael Select Charity Fund Inc: $603 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBeis Aharon VYisroel Inc DBA American Friends of Here Next Year: $560 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF MICHLALAH YERUSHALAYIM INC ↗
  • Who funds KIDS OF COURAGE INC ↗
  • Who funds SOLDIERS SAVE LIVES CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds CAMP HASC INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH UNION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds American Friends of Yeshivat Lev Hatorah ↗
  • Who funds Torat Shraga Inc ↗
  • Who funds DAVIS MEMORIAL FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER ↗
  • Who funds YAD CHAYA INC ↗
  • Who funds TOMCHEI TZEDAKA CORP ↗
  • Who funds KEREN ANIYIM INC ↗
  • Who funds CHAI LIFELINE INC ↗
  • Who funds SHARE OF NEW SQUARE INC DBA CHESED 247 ↗
  • Who funds A Torah Infertilty Medium Exchange ↗
  • Who funds ROFEH CHOLIM CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Astar Foundation IncNY118.9× affinity58 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Astar Foundation Inc · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · The Ojc Fund · Zichron Chaim Charity Fund · Zichron Yechiel Mechel Foundation · Marbeh Shalom Foundation Inc · The J W Foundation · The Setton Foundation · The Jimmy and Berta Khezrie Charitable Foundation · The Jmg Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · The Zev and Susan Munk Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Alyad Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Alyad Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 220%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 21%
  • Bnos Melech of Lakewood Inc: 21% of income from government
  • Chai 4EVER Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
22get no government money at all
12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Alyad Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Alyad Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 519 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Alyad’s filings →

More from the funding graph