Skip to content

· Private foundation

Alvin Goldfarb Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$28M
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$12M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Community Improvement$66MHousing & Shelter$20MEducation$2.9MArts & Culture$1.5MYouth Development$1.3MHealth$663kCivil Rights$328kHuman Services$127k
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $81k
  • $250k+5 grants · $28M
$37,515
Median grant
2
States reached
$291M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Community Impact Network$11,657,932
Community Impact Network$11,015,500
NCJW$2,592,529
Historical Assn Of South Haven$2,000,000
Community Impact Network$500,000
Beyond Housing$37,515
NCJW$31,250
STAR$12,497
Individual grant recipient$5,575
St Louis Symphony$2,500
The Legacy Center$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–21, $1.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Prosperity Connection: $218k → 21%Prosperity Connection: $200k → 21%Prosperity Connection: $183k → 21%Prosperity Connection: $158k → 21%Prosperity Connection: $2k → 21%Nurses for Newborns: $115k → 11%Nurses for Newborns: $98k → 11%Nurses for Newborns: $9k → 11%Helping Hand Me Downs: $17k → 11%Helping Hand Me Downs: $17k → 11%Helping Hand Me Downs: $12k → 11%Helping Hand Me Downs: $10k → 11%St Louis Arc Inc: $91k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$114M · 15 repeat orgs$5.3M to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
6

Total granted

$114M
$2.7M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
+29%

Still filing today

67%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.6M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterEducationArts & CulturePhilanthropyRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BH
    BEYOND HOUSING INC
    5× · 2017–2025 · $3.1M · revenue +21%
  • TW
    THE WYMAN CENTER
    3× · 2017–2020 · $710k · revenue +10%
  • PC
    PROSPERITY CONNECTION
    3× · 2017–2019 · $709k · revenue +11% · 31% of their budget

Funded once

  • WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2024 · $1.5M · revenue +13%
  • BH
    BEYOND HOUSING CAPITAL FUND INC
    one grant, 2024 · $700k · revenue 0% · 66% of their budget
  • AH
    Affinia Healthcaregraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $350k · revenue +29%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Teach St Louis

Founded In 2018, Teach St. Louis (formerly St. Louis Teacher Residency) launched to improve teacher quality and retention in St. Louis, a city where 40% of new teachers exit the classroom in their first three years. Teach St. Louis…

Education
2
Commonbond Communities

Commonbond's mission is to build stable homes, strong futures and vibrant communities. as the largest nonprofit provider of affordable homes in the upper midwest, commonbond has been building and sustaining homes with services to families,…

—
3
Enterprise Community Investment Inc

All our efforts support our strategic goals to increase housing supply, advance racial equity and build resilience and upward mobility.the organization raises private capital through investment and by forming effective partnerships.…

Housing & Shelter
4
Community Builders Network of Metro St Louis

The Community Builders Network of Metro St. Louis (CBN) is a coalition of community building organizations, including both place-based nonprofits and supporting partners. Our mission is to gather community leaders of all backgrounds to…

Community Improvement
5
Neighborhood Solidarity Fund

Invest stl facilitates investment in the power of people and their neighborhoods to develop communities of justice and opportunity in places that continue to endure the legacy of systemic anti-black racism.

Community Improvement
6
Action to Equity
Youth Development
7
Beyond Housing

We strive to serve the community by constructing and rehabilitating homes for affordable homeownership, providing new housing rentals for low to moderate wealth families in south carolina, and providing services that aid in all aspects of…

—
8
Community Housing Council
Housing & Shelter
9
Community Housing Network Inc

Community housing network's (chn) mission is to empower people to live in affordable homes to help build thriving communities.

Community Improvement
10
Chn Housing Capital

Chn housing capital is a certified community development financial institution serving low-income individuals and distressed communities guided by the belief that homeownership should be within everyone's reach.

Human Services
11
St Louis Integrated Health Network

The st. louis integrated health network, through partnership and collaboration, is a healthcare intermediary building capacity across sectors to improve wellbeing by increasing access to health and social services.

Health
12
Chattanooga Neighborhood Enterprise

Mission: to create economically diverse neighborhoods filled with financially empowered citizens and housing for all.vision: all chattanoogans can afford a safe place in a strong neighborhood to call home. belief: we believe the future of…

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Opportunity Trust D/B/a Zest Education; the most unlike its peers is Equity Homes. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

6
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/17
Grantees still filing
10/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COMMUNITY IMPACT NETWORK: $88,465,408 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY IMPACT NETWORKEQUITY HOMES: $11,467,155 · Housing & ShelterEQUITY HOMESBEYOND HOUSING INC: $3,085,711 · Housing & ShelterBEYOND HOUSING I…241 COMMUNITY LAND TRUST: $3,066,807 · Housing & Shelter241 COMMUNITY LA…NCJW: $2,623,779 · OtherUnited 4 Children: $1,196,522 · OtherBig Brothers Big Sisters: $588,500 · OtherAffinia Healthcare: $350,000 · OtherThe Equity Network: $328,412 · Other+5 more: $187,827 · OtherHISTORICAL ASSOC OF SOUTH HAVEN: $3,500,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $2,500 · Arts & CultureWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $1,500,000 · EducationPROGRESS IN EDUCATION INC: $125,000 · Education+1 more: $50,000 · EducationPROSPERITY CONNECTION: $709,138 · Human ServicesNURSES FOR NEWBORNS: $222,060 · Human ServicesST LOUIS ARC INC: $91,237 · Human ServicesHELPING HAND ME DOWNS: $55,911 · Human ServicesTHE WYMAN CENTER: $710,001 · Recreation & SportsBEYOND HOUSING CAPITAL FUND INC: $700,000 · Community Improvement
Philanthropy$88,465,408Housing & Shelter$17,619,673Other$5,275,040Arts & Culture$3,502,500Education$1,675,000Human Services$1,078,346Recreation & Sports$710,001Community Improvement$700,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMUNITY IMPACT NETWORK: $88,465,408 over 8y, 95% of budgetEQUITY HOMES: $11,467,155 over 4y, 99% of budgetHISTORICAL ASSOC OF SOUTH HAVEN: $3,500,000 over 2y, 90% of budgetBEYOND HOUSING INC: $3,085,711 over 5y, 15% of budget241 COMMUNITY LAND TRUST: $3,066,807 over 3y, 42% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $1,500,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WYMAN CENTER: $710,001 over 3y, 4.9% of budgetPROSPERITY CONNECTION: $709,138 over 3y, 31% of budgetBEYOND HOUSING CAPITAL FUND INC: $700,000 over 1y, 66% of budgetAffinia Healthcare: $350,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetThe Equity Network: $328,412 over 2y, 16% of budgetNURSES FOR NEWBORNS: $222,060 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetPROGRESS IN EDUCATION INC: $125,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetST LOUIS ARC INC: $91,237 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHELPING HAND ME DOWNS: $55,911 over 4y, 3.3% of budgetTHE OPPORTUNITY TRUST D/B/A ZEST EDUCATION: $50,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSAINT LOUIS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COMMUNITY IMPACT NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds EQUITY HOMES ↗
  • Who funds HISTORICAL ASSOC OF SOUTH HAVEN ↗
  • Who funds BEYOND HOUSING INC ↗
  • Who funds 241 COMMUNITY LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE WYMAN CENTER ↗
  • Who funds PROSPERITY CONNECTION ↗
  • Who funds BEYOND HOUSING CAPITAL FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds Affinia Healthcare ↗
  • Who funds The Equity Network ↗
  • Who funds NURSES FOR NEWBORNS ↗
  • Who funds PROGRESS IN EDUCATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ST LOUIS ARC INC ↗
  • Who funds HELPING HAND ME DOWNS ↗
  • Who funds THE OPPORTUNITY TRUST D/B/A ZEST EDUCATION ↗
  • Who funds SAINT LOUIS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Impact NetworkMO15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Impact Network · The Crawford Taylor Foundation · Pershing Charitable Trust · United Way of Greater St Louis Inc · St Louis Community Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Alvin Goldfarb Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Alvin Goldfarb Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Alvin Goldfarb Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Alvin Goldfarb Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Alvin Goldfarb’s filings →

    More from the funding graph