Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Alpha Phi Alpha Foundation of Akron

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$29k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$9k
Largest
01What you fund
0192% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Education$99kHealth$49kCivil Rights$32kPhilanthropy$31kHuman Services$19kReligion$19kYouth Development$18kPublic Benefit$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$583k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
University of Akron$8,500
Project Grad of Akron$5,000
March of Dimes$3,000
Akron Urban League$2,500
Akron Zoological Park$2,500
Leadership Akron$1,500
Haven of Rest Ministries$1,500
NAACP - Akron Branch$1,000
Akron Community Foundation$1,000
AROPI$1,000
AFPNEO$600
United Disability Services$500
St Paul AME Church$400
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Akron Urban League: $6k → 13%Akron Urban League: $3k → 13%Akron Urban League: $3k → 13%The Akron Urban League: $2k → 13%Sarah's House Inc: $1k → 13%Akron Urban League: $500 → 13%Sarah's House Inc: $500 → 13%Akron Aids Collaborative: $2k → 13%Open M: $3k → 13%Open M: $2k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$250k · 28 repeat orgs$30k to everyone else

28 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 18 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
25

Total granted

$250k
$27k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+268%

Still filing today

46%
12%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationHealthArts & CultureRecreation & SportsHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PG
    PROJECT GRAD AKRON
    5× · 2018–2024 · $30k · revenue +111%
  • AC
    AKRON COMMUNITY SERVICE CENTER & URBAN LEAGUE INC
    4× · 2017–2024 · $13k · revenue +55%
  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF NORTHEAST OHIO
    2× · 2020–2023 · $6k · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • AI
    Akron-UMADAOP Inc
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
  • CC
    Cleveland Clinic Akron General
    one grant, 2019 · $3k
  • FG
    First Grace United Church of Chirst
    one grant, 2017 · $3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Akron Parks Collaborative

To engage the akron, ohio community around the creation and sustainability of vibrant public spaces within the city of akron. we foster and support neighborhood park advocates by enabling them to meet their goals, partner with the city and…

Recreation & Sports
2
Akron Revitalization Committee Inc
Community Improvement
3
Alpha Phi Alpha Foundation of Akron
4
Greater Akron Chamber

To promote business in the tri-county area

5
Akron Bar Association

To enhance the quality of law and justice through community service and to maintain the integrity of the profession.

6
Akron Black Artist Guild

Exclusively for charitable, religious, educational

Arts & Culture
7
Akron Development Corporation

The akron development corporation was organized to support economic development initiatives in the city of akron, particularly through the former akron global business accelerator and to secure state of ohio funding for technology-based…

Community Improvement
8
Akron Soul Train

Akron soul train (ast) is a multidisciplinary residency program that provides 12-15 artists each year with paid residencies. our mission is to offer ohio-based visual, performing, and literary artists the space, time, and financial…

Arts & Culture
9
Ohio Business Leadership Network
10
Autism Society of Greater Akron

We create connections, empowering everyone in the autism community with the resources needed to live fully.

Health
11
Akron-Canton Regional Foodbank

The mission of the akron-canton regional foodbank is to lead a collaborative network that empowers people to experience healthy and hunger-free lives. we distribute food to feed people and we advocate, engage and convene our community in…

Food & Nutrition
12
The Goodwill Industries of Akron Ohio Inc

Goodwill industries of akron, ohio, inc is a not-for-profit corporation that helps individuals prepare for, find, and retain employment. goodwill serves the five-county region of summit, portage, medina, ashland, and richland. goodwill…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Akron Community Service Center & Urban League Inc and the most unlike its peers is Akron Aids Collaborative. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%14%<5yr14%0%5–10yr17%18%10–20yr16%23%20–35yr17%18%35–55yr17%27%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%6%<5yr14%0%5–10yr17%3%10–20yr16%23%20–35yr17%13%35–55yr17%55%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 14% of your grantees by number, and just 6% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/23
the rest of the field
13%
420/3,221

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 56 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/19
Grantees still filing
11/19
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

University of Akron — $30,500 · OtherUniversity of AkronNAACP - Akron Branch — $29,250 · OtherNAACP - Akron BranchProject Grad of Akron — $22,500 · OtherProject Grad of AkronBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE WESTERN RESERVE INC — $11,500 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE WESTERN RESERVE INCHAVEN OF REST MINISTRIES INCORPORATED — $9,500 · OtherHAVEN OF REST MINISTRIES INCORPORATEDUNITED DISABILITY SERVICES INC — $8,000 · OtherAKRON ROUNDTABLE — $6,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $6,000 · Other+36 more — $52,953 · Other+36 morePROJECT GRAD AKRON — $29,500 · EducationPROJECT GRAD A…THE UNIVERSITY OF AKRON FOUNDATION — $5,500 · EducationTHE UNIVERSITY…LEADERSHIP AKRON — $2,750 · EducationLEADERSHIP AKR…In Education Inc — $2,500 · EducationIn Education I…MARCH OF DIMES INC — $34,000 · HealthMARCH OF DIM…AKRON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $30,500 · PhilanthropyAKRON COMMU…AKRON COMMUNITY SERVICE CENTER & URBAN LEAGUE INC — $12,800 · Human ServicesOPPORTUNITY PARISH ECUMENICAL NEIGHBORHOOD MINISTRY — $4,500 · Human ServicesSARAHS HOUSE INC — $1,500 · Human ServicesAKRON AIDS COLLABORATIVE — $1,500 · Human ServicesBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF NORTHEAST OHIO — $6,000 · Youth DevelopmentAKRON ZOOLOGICAL PARK — $2,500 · Animals
Other$176,703Education$40,250Health$34,000Philanthropy$30,500Human Services$20,300Youth Development$6,000Animals$2,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC — $34,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetAKRON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $30,500 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetPROJECT GRAD AKRON — $29,500 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetAKRON COMMUNITY SERVICE CENTER & URBAN LEAGUE INC — $12,800 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE WESTERN RESERVE INC — $11,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetUNITED DISABILITY SERVICES INC — $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAKRON ROUNDTABLE — $6,500 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF NORTHEAST OHIO — $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF AKRON FOUNDATION — $5,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBAL TIES AKRON — $3,500 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetLEADERSHIP AKRON — $2,750 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetIn Education Inc — $2,500 over 2y, 4.2% of budgetAKRON ZOOLOGICAL PARK — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSARAHS HOUSE INC — $1,500 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetSUMMIT ARTSPACE — $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetADAPTIVE SPORTS PROGRAM OF OHIO — $700 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHARMONY HOUSE INC — $500 over 1y, 1.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC
  • Who funds AKRON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds PROJECT GRAD AKRON
  • Who funds AKRON COMMUNITY SERVICE CENTER & URBAN LEAGUE INC
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE WESTERN RESERVE INC
  • Who funds UNITED DISABILITY SERVICES INC
  • Who funds AKRON ROUNDTABLE
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF NORTHEAST OHIO
  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF AKRON FOUNDATION
  • Who funds OPPORTUNITY PARISH ECUMENICAL NEIGHBORHOOD MINISTRY
  • Who funds GLOBAL TIES AKRON
  • Who funds LEADERSHIP AKRON
  • Who funds In Education Inc
  • Who funds AKRON ZOOLOGICAL PARK
  • Who funds SARAHS HOUSE INC
  • Who funds AKRON AIDS COLLABORATIVE
  • Who funds SUMMIT ARTSPACE

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Gar FoundationPA28.4× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Gar Foundation · Synthomer Foundation Inc · Akron Community Foundation · Burton D Morgan Foundation Inc · Lehner Family Foundation · Northern Ohio Golf Charities Foundation Inc · The Welty Family Foundation · Sisler McFawn Foundation Pfdn · Firstenergy Foundation · Mary S & David C Corbin Foundation · Maynard Family Foundation · Lloyd L & Louise K Smith Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Alpha Phi Alpha Foundation of Akron funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 56 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph