Skip to content

· Public charity

Alpha Delta Pi Foundation

The ALPHA DELTA PI FOUNDATION supports the educational, leadership, and philanthropic endeavors of alpha delta pi sorority and its members by providing scholarships, leadership development opportunities, and financial assistance to charitable initiatives.

$1.4M
Granted FY2023
9
Grants FY2023
9
States reached
$187k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Education$4.0MHousing & Shelter$1.5MHealth$1.3MHuman Services$198kPhilanthropy$153kMembership Benefit$31kRecreation & Sports$7k
02FY2023 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 9 grants below total $989,308, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,396,904 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $407,596 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2023

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $95k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $894k
$141,243
Median grant
9
States reached
$28M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ALPHA OMICRON OF ALPHA DELTA PI$187,445
ALPHA DELTA PI SORORITY$171,356
ZETA LAMBDA HOUSE CORPORATION$157,922
DELTA DELTA HOUSE CORPORATION$143,517
GAMMA IOTA OF ADPI HOUSE CORP$141,243
ZETA BETA OF ADPI HOUSE CORP$92,337
DELTA SIGMA HOUSE CORPORATION$35,993
ALPHA PSI HOUSE CORPORATION$33,495
FOUNDATION FOR FRATERNAL EXCELLENCE$26,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 91% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ALPHA PSI HOUSE CORPORATION: $33k → 14%GAMMA CHI HOUSE CORPORATION: $7k → 11%ZETA LAMBDA HOUSE CORPORATION: $195k → 22%ALPHA OMICRON OF ALPHA DELTA PI: $1.2M → 15%DELTA DELTA HOUSE CORPORATION: $418k → 14%GAMMA IOTA OF ADPI HOUSE CORP: $385k → 19%ALPHA GAMMA OF ADPI HOUSE CORP: $16k → 17%ZETA BETA OF ADPI HOUSE CORP: $198k → 8%ALPHA DELTA PI SORORITY: $204k → 13%FOUNDATION FOR FRATERNAL EXCELLENCE: $26k → 5%DELTA SIGMA CHAPTER OF ADPI CORP: $91k → 18%BETA PSI HOUSE CORPORATION OF ALPHA DELTA PI: $87k → 15%ALPHA PSI OF ADPI HOUSE CORP: $15k → 14%ZETA LAMBDA HOUSE CORPORATION: $158k → 22%ALPHA OMICRON OF ALPHA DELTA PI: $539k → 15%DELTA DELTA HOUSE CORPORATION: $249k → 14%GAMMA IOTA OF ADPI HOUSE CORP: $235k → 19%ZETA BETA OF ADPI HOUSE CORP: $134k → 8%ALPHA DELTA PI SORORITY: $171k → 13%DELTA SIGMA HOUSE CORPORATION: $38k → 18%ALPHA OMICRON OF ALPHA DELTA PI: $278k → 15%DELTA DELTA HOUSE CORPORATION: $144k → 14%GAMMA IOTA OF ADPI HOUSE CORP: $227k → 19%ZETA BETA OF ADPI HOUSE CORP: $110k → 8%ALPHA DELTA PI SORORITY: $171k → 13%DELTA SIGMA HOUSE CORPORATION: $36k → 18%ALPHA OMICRON OF ALPHA DELTA PI: $187k → 15%GAMMA IOTA OF ADPI HOUSE CORP: $141k → 19%ZETA BETA OF ADPI HOUSE CORP: $92k → 8%ALPHA DELTA PI SORORITY: $167k → 13%ALPHA OMICRON OF ALPHA DELTA PI: $116k → 15%ALPHA DELTA PI SORORITY: $147k → 13%ALPHA DELTA PI SORORITY: $131k → 13%ALPHA DELTA PI SORORITY: $107k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IN
CA
MO
KY
AR
NC
OK
MS
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$7.1M · 10 repeat orgs$50k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +47% since the first grant, against +30% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2023, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
2

Total granted

$7.1M
$24k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
+30%

Still filing today

80%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $26k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
EducationRecreation & SportsHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AO
    ALPHA OMICRON OF ALPHA DELTA PI BUILDING CORPORATION
    7× · 2019–2025 · $2.3M · revenue +213% · 34% of their budget
  • AD
    ALPHA DELTA PI SORORITY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.1M · revenue +47%
  • GI
    GAMMA IOTA CHAPTER OF ALPHA DELTA PI HOUSE CORPORATION
    5× · 2020–2025 · $989k · revenue +121% · 45% of their budget

Funded once

  • AG
    ALPHA GAMMA CHAPTER OF ALPHA DELTA PI HOUSE CORPgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $16k · revenue +30%
  • GC
    GAMMA CHI HOUSE CORPORATION
    one grant, 2020 · $7k · revenue -15%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Alpha Psi House Corporation of Delta Gamma Inc

Provide a suitable social environment for collegiate members.

—
2
Alpha Pi Building Corporation

Provide a suitable social environment for collegiate members.

Recreation & Sports
3
Georgia Tech Chapter of Delta Chi Fraternity Housing Corporation

Chapter housing leased to members to provide an environment for study, sleep, hygiene, meals and fellowship, suitable for the development of men attending the institute for education.

—
4
Alpha Kappa of Alpha Chi Omega Alumni Holding Association

Collegiate sorority housing

—
5
Delta Delta Delta Housing Corporation

N/a

Education
6
Phi Kappa Psi - Oregon Alpha Chapter S&T Fraternity Management

Housing for college fraternity

—
7
Delta Gamma House Corporation

Provide a suitable social environment for collegiate members.

Membership Benefit
8
Alpha Upsilon Housing Corporation of Delta Gamma

Provide a suitable social environment for collegiate members.

—
9
Nv Alpha House Corp of Pi Beta Phi

The operation and maintenance of a residence for sorority women while they attend the University. Residence and board are provided for approximately 48 weeks per year.

—
10
Epsilon House Corporation of Delta Gamma

To provide a suitable social environment for collegiate members.

—
11
Delta Iota Chapter House Corporation of Delta Gamm

Provide a suitable social environment for collegiate members.

Recreation & Sports
12
Gamma Xi House Corporation of Delta Gamma Inc

Provide a suitable social environment for collegiate members.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Alpha Gamma Chapter of Alpha Delta Pi House Corp; the most unlike its peers is Ronald Mcdonald House Charities of Southwest Florida Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/23
Grantees still filing
13/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ALPHA OMICRON OF ALPHA DELTA PI BUILDING CORPORATION: $2,311,984 · OtherALPHA OMICRON OF ALPHA DELTA PI BUILDING CORPORATIONALPHA DELTA PI SORORITY: $1,098,012 · OtherALPHA DELTA PI SORORITYDELTA DELTA OF ALPHA DELTA PI HOUSE CORPORATION: $810,885 · OtherDELTA DELTA OF ALPHA DELTA PI HOUSE CORPORATIONBeta Psi House Corporation of ADPi: $635,973 · OtherBeta Psi House Corporation of ADPiZETA BETA HOUSE CORPORATION OF ALPH DELTA PI C/O ALEXANDER GUESS CPA PA: $533,561 · OtherZETA BETA HOUSE CORPORATION OF ALPH DELTA PI C/O ALEXANDER GUESS CPA PA+4 more: $243,787 · OtherGAMMA IOTA CHAPTER OF ALPHA DELTA PI HOUSE CORPORATION: $988,839 · EducationGAMMA IOTA CHAPTER…DELTA SIGMA CHAPTER OF ALPHA DELTA PI HOUSE CORPORATION: $164,815 · EducationDELTA SIGMA CHAPTE…ZETA LAMBDA CHAPTER ALPHA DELTA P HOUSE CORPORATION: $352,602 · Housing & ShelterGAMMA CHI HOUSE CORPORATION: $7,412 · Recreation & Sports
Other$5,634,202Education$1,153,654Housing & Shelter$352,602Recreation & Sports$7,412

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetALPHA OMICRON OF ALPHA DELTA PI BUILDING CORPORATION: $2,311,984 over 7y, 34% of budgetALPHA DELTA PI SORORITY: $1,098,012 over 9y, 2.9% of budgetGAMMA IOTA CHAPTER OF ALPHA DELTA PI HOUSE CORPORATION: $988,839 over 5y, 45% of budgetDELTA DELTA OF ALPHA DELTA PI HOUSE CORPORATION: $810,885 over 4y, 33% of budgetBeta Psi House Corporation of ADPi: $635,973 over 2y, 62% of budgetZETA BETA HOUSE CORPORATION OF ALPH DELTA PI C/O ALEXANDER GUESS CPA PA: $533,561 over 6y, 56% of budgetDELTA SIGMA CHAPTER OF ALPHA DELTA PI HOUSE CORPORATION: $164,815 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetAlpha Psi of Alpha Delta Pi House Corporation: $48,335 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR FRATERNAL EXCELLENCE INC: $26,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetALPHA GAMMA CHAPTER OF ALPHA DELTA PI HOUSE CORP: $16,229 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetGAMMA CHI HOUSE CORPORATION: $7,412 over 1y, 8.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ronald McDonald House GlobalIL17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ronald McDonald House Global · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Alpha Delta Pi Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Alpha Delta Pi Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Alpha Delta Pi Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Alpha Delta Pi Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $3.4M of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Alpha Delta Pi’s filings →

    More from the funding graph