Skip to content

· Public charity

Alpha Chi Omega Fraternity Inc Subordinate Group Return

Through the real.

$494k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$275k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Philanthropy$1.8MEducation$459kHuman Services$118kEnvironment$112kHousing & Shelter$31kYouth Development$29kRecreation & Sports$11kArts & Culture$6kOther$0
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $423,519, the rows itemized in this filing. The $494,207 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $70,688 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $70k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $79k
  • $250k+1 grant · $275k
$30,540
Median grant
4
States reached
$21M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ALPHA CHI OMEGA FOUNDATION$274,528
THE SAFE ALLIANCE$79,086
FRIENDSHIP HOME$30,540
WACO FAMILY ABUSE CENTER$20,632
TRUE NORTH OF COLUMBIA$18,733
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $21k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WACO FAMILY ABUSE CENTER: $21k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
IN
CA
NE
MO
NC
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.0M · 4 repeat orgs$648k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
24

Total granted

$2.0M
$499k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-8%
+14%

Still filing today

25%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $149k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AC
    ALPHA CHI OMEGA FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $1.8M · revenue -8%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS
    3× · 2021–2023 · $93k
  • CO
    CURATORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI SPECIAL TR
    2× · 2022–2023 · $70k

Funded once

  • SM
    SOUTHERN METHODIST UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2020 · $125k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN
    one grant, 2020 · $100k
  • Southern Methodist University
    one grant, 2023 · $54k · revenue +14%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Texas Wesleyan University

Texas wesleyan university, guided by its deep methodist heritage, provides transformational learning experiences and research opportunities to a diverse group of students to develop their full potential as individuals and as members of the…

Education
2
Trinity University

Trinity university is an independent co-educational university whose mission is excellence in the interrelated areas of teaching, research and services.

Education
3
Taylor University

The mission of Taylor University is to develop servant-leaders marked with a passion to minister Christ's redemptive love, grace, and truth to a world in need.

Education
4
John Brown University

John brown university (jbu) provides christ-centered education that prepares students to honor god and serve others by developing their intellectual, spiritual, and professional lives. (continued on schedule o)jbu serves traditional…

Education
5
University of the South

The College of Arts and Sciences is committed to the development of the whole person through a liberal arts education of the highest quality. The School of Theology educates women and men to serve the broad whole of the Episcopal Church in…

Education
6
Hardin-Simmons University

The mission of hardin-simmons university is to be a community dedicated to providing excellence in education enlightened by christian faith and values.

Education
7
William Marsh Rice University

As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…

Education
8
Florida Southern College

Florida southern college (florida southern or the college) is committed to educational excellence and is a selective comprehensive, private, united methodist affiliated college with a strong liberal arts core and signature programs. (see…

Education
9
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
10
Charleston Southern University

Charleston southern university (csu) is a private, four-year co-educational institution organized under the laws of the state of south carolina as a non-profit organization and sponsored by the south carolina baptist convention. the…

Education
11
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
12
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Safe Alliance; the most unlike its peers is True North of Columbia Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ALPHA CHI OMEGA FOUNDATION INC: $1,791,894 · EducationALPHA CHI OMEGA FOUNDATION INC+3 more: $72,672 · EducationSOUTHERN METHODIST UNIVERSITY: $125,000 · OtherSOUTHERN METHODIST UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN: $100,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTINUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS: $93,204 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TEXASTHE SAFE ALLIANCE: $79,086 · OtherTHE SAFE ALLIANCECURATORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI SPECIAL TR: $70,191 · OtherCURATORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF…STEPHEN F AUSTIN STATE UNIVERSITY ALUMNI FOUNDATION INC: $25,222 · Other+19 more: $194,673 · Other+19 moreFRIENDSHIP HOME OF LINCOLN INC: $30,540 · Human ServicesFAMILY ABUSE CENTER INC: $20,632 · Human ServicesTRUE NORTH OF COLUMBIA INC: $18,733 · Human Services
Education$1,864,566Other$687,376Human Services$69,905

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetALPHA CHI OMEGA FOUNDATION INC: $1,791,894 over 5y, 10% of budgetTHE SAFE ALLIANCE: $79,086 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSouthern Methodist University: $53,875 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDSHIP HOME OF LINCOLN INC: $30,540 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetFAMILY ABUSE CENTER INC: $20,632 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTRUE NORTH OF COLUMBIA INC: $18,733 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $11,450 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBAYLOR UNIVERSITY: $7,347 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ALPHA CHI OMEGA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SAFE ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds Southern Methodist University ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDSHIP HOME OF LINCOLN INC ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN F AUSTIN STATE UNIVERSITY ALUMNI FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY ABUSE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds TRUE NORTH OF COLUMBIA INC ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds BAYLOR UNIVERSITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Tulsa Community FoundationOK14.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Tulsa Community Foundation · American Chemical Society · National Collegiate Athletic Association · Folds of Honor Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Alpha Chi Omega Fraternity Inc Subordinate Group Return funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Alpha Chi Omega Fraternity Inc Subordinate Group Return. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Alpha Chi Omega Fraternity Inc Subordinate Group Return’s filings →

    More from the funding graph