Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Allyrae Wallace Educational Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$187k
Granted FY2025still arriving
23
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$36k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$1.2MRecreation & Sports$200
02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k17 grants · $53k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $134k
$3,250
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AUBURN UNIVERSITY$36,125
UNIVERSITY OF WEST ALABAMA$25,225
UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA$25,050
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH ALABAMA$19,125
TROY UNIVERSITY$17,450
Individual grant recipient$11,425
ALABAMA A M$8,700
ALABAMA STATE UNIVERSITY$8,700
SOUTHERN UNION STATE COMM COLLEGE$5,306
UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA BIRMINGHAM$3,825
HUNTINGDON COLLEGE$3,250
TUSKEGEE UNIVERSITY$3,250
UNIVERSITY OF MONTEVALLO$3,250
STILLMAN COLLEGE$2,725
UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI$2,725
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 96% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ALABAMA A M: $17k → 11%COASTAL ALABAMA COMMUNITY: $14k → 12%AUBURN UNIVERSITY: $43k → 15%SOUTHERN UNION STATE COMM COLLEGE: $9k → 20%TROY UNIVERSITY: $19k → 27%UNIVERSITY OF WEST ALABAMA: $25k → 31%ALABAMA A M: $15k → 11%COASTAL ALABAMA COMMUNITY: $13k → 12%AUBURN UNIVERSITY: $41k → 15%SOUTHERN UNION STATE COMM COLLEGE: $9k → 20%TROY UNIVERSITY: $18k → 27%UNIVERSITY OF WEST ALABAMA: $19k → 31%ALABAMA A M: $15k → 11%COASTAL ALABAMA COMMUNITY: $11k → 12%AUBURN UNIVERSITY: $36k → 15%TROY UNIVERSITY: $18k → 27%UNIVERSITY OF WEST ALABAMA: $19k → 31%ALABAMA A M: $15k → 11%COASTAL ALABAMA COMMUNITY: $11k → 12%AUBURN UNIVERSITY: $24k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH ALABAMA: $23k → 19%TROY UNIVERSITY: $17k → 27%UNIVERSITY OF WEST ALABAMA: $17k → 31%ALABAMA A M: $11k → 11%AUBURN UNIVERSITY: $24k → 15%ALABAMA STATE UNIVERSITY: $14k → 18%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH ALABAMA: $19k → 19%UNIVERSITY OF WEST ALABAMA: $13k → 31%ALABAMA A M: $9k → 11%AUBURN UNIVERSITY: $18k → 15%ALABAMA STATE UNIVERSITY: $9k → 18%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH ALABAMA: $16k → 19%UNIVERSITY OF WEST ALABAMA: $10k → 31%ALABAMA A M: $9k → 11%AUBURN UNIVERSITY: $16k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH ALABAMA: $12k → 19%UNIVERSITY OF WEST ALABAMA: $9k → 31%AUBURN UNIVERSITY: $13k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH ALABAMA: $11k → 19%AUBURN UNIVERSITY: $11k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA: $25k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA: $22k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA: $22k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA: $20k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA: $17k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA: $15k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA: $13k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WI
NY
MA
IA
CA
UT
MO
KY
MD
TN
NC
DC
OK
MS
AL
GA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.2M · 53 repeat orgs$15k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +22% since the first grant, against +13% for the ones you funded once.

53 repeat relationships — 21 still active in FY2025, 32 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

53
23

Total granted

$1.2M
$14k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+13%

Still filing today

25%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MOBILE
    3× · 2017–2019 · $10k · revenue +22%
  • HC
    HUNTINGDON COLLEGE
    4× · 2017–2025 · $7k · revenue +21%
  • SC
    Stillman College
    5× · 2017–2025 · $5k · revenue +77%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $4k
  • CC
    CONCORDIA COLLEGE
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
  • MU
    Maryville University - St Louis
    one grant, 2024 · $1k · revenue -5%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Roger Williams University

At Roger Williams University, students are prepared to be thinkers and doers ready to solve challenging problems with innovative solutions. RWU offers robust offerings of undergraduate, graduate and professional programs across eight…

Education
2
Regent University

Regent University serves as a center of Christian thought and action to provide excellent education through a Biblical perspective and global context equipping Christian leaders to change the world.

3
University of Lynchburg

The mission of the University is to inspire independent thinkers who become trustworthy, effective leaders that shape caring communities. The vision of the University of Lynchburg is to cultivate a world that is innovative, authentic, and…

Education
4
Trinity University

Trinity university is an independent co-educational university whose mission is excellence in the interrelated areas of teaching, research and services.

Education
5
University of the South

The College of Arts and Sciences is committed to the development of the whole person through a liberal arts education of the highest quality. The School of Theology educates women and men to serve the broad whole of the Episcopal Church in…

Education
6
Tusculum University

Building on a rich Presbyterian heritage and a pioneering spirit, Tusculum University provides an active and experiential education within a caring Christian environment to inspire civic engagement, enrich personal lives, and equip…

Education
7
Roberts Wesleyan University

As new york's leading university for character education, rwu is a community of learners committed to historic christianity which seeks to prepare thoughtful, spiritually mature, service-oriented people who will transform society.

Education
8
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
9
Spartanburg Methodist College

SMC Delivers an exceptional education that fuses the empowerment of the liberal arts with crucial career skills. Our mission is to equip our students with the knowledge, skills, virtues, and mindset needed to thrive personally, create…

Education
10
Franklin University

Since 1902, Franklin University has been a pioneer in meeting the needs of adult students who have the ambition to continue their education in combination with other responsibilities, receiving its status as a tax exempt organization in…

11
Loyola University

Loyola University New Orleans, a Jesuit and Catholic institution of higher education, welcomes students of diverse backgrounds and prepares them to lead meaningful lives with and for others; to pursue truth, wisdom, and virtue; and to work…

Education
12
Rollins College

Education and Public Service Mission: Rollins College educates students for global citizenship and responsible leadership, empowering graduates to pursue meaningful lives and productive careers. We are committed to liberal arts ethos and…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Samford University and the most unlike its peers is Fort Valley State College National Alumni Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 56 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number23%5%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%18%10–20yr15%14%20–35yr12%9%35–55yr17%55%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value23%1%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%9%10–20yr15%13%20–35yr12%3%35–55yr17%75%55yr+

The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/25
the rest of the field
14%
3,157/22,754

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 78 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
13/17
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

AUBURN UNIVERSITY — $226,025 · OtherAUBURN UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA — $152,400 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF ALABAMAUNIVERSITY OF WEST ALABAMA — $125,175 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WEST ALABAMAUNIVERSITY OF SOUTH ALABAMA — $107,375 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF SOUTH ALABAMATROY UNIVERSITY — $104,050 · OtherTROY UNIVERSITYALABAMA A M — $98,425 · OtherALABAMA A MIndividual grant recipient — $67,775 · OtherIndividual grant recipientALABAMA STATE UNIVERSITY — $56,200 · Other+55 more — $247,950 · Other+55 moreMiles College Inc — $15,325 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF MOBILE — $10,000 · EducationHUNTINGDON COLLEGE — $6,950 · EducationStillman College — $5,475 · EducationTuskegee University — $3,600 · EducationPALM BEACH ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY INC — $3,200 · EducationSELMA UNIVERSITY — $2,650 · EducationThe University of Tulsa — $2,400 · Education+6 more — $5,475 · EducationNORTH CAROLINA STATE — $200 · Recreation & Sports
Other$1,185,375Education$55,075Recreation & Sports$200

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMiles College Inc — $15,325 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MOBILE — $10,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHUNTINGDON COLLEGE — $6,950 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetStillman College — $5,475 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFORT VALLEY STATE COLLEGE NATIONAL ALUMNI ASSOCIATION INC — $3,800 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetTuskegee University — $3,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPALM BEACH ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY INC — $3,200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTalladega College — $2,700 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSELMA UNIVERSITY — $2,650 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetThe University of Tulsa — $2,400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSamford University — $1,725 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMaryville University - St Louis — $1,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHERZING UNIVERSITY LTD — $1,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMillsaps College — $700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVanderbilt University — $450 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWilliams College — $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH CAROLINA STATE — $200 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Miles College Inc
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MOBILE
  • Who funds HUNTINGDON COLLEGE
  • Who funds Stillman College
  • Who funds FORT VALLEY STATE COLLEGE NATIONAL ALUMNI ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds Tuskegee University
  • Who funds PALM BEACH ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY INC
  • Who funds Talladega College
  • Who funds SELMA UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds The University of Tulsa

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Simpson FoundationMO26.4× affinity10 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Simpson Foundation · Alabama Association of Independent Colleges and Universities · Southern Company Charitable Foundation Inc · Lettie Pate Whitehead Foundation Inc · Council of Independent Colleges · Alabama Power Foundation Inc · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Allyrae Wallace Educational Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 2%
  • The University of Tulsa2% of income from government
  • Williams College0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Allyrae Wallace Educational Trust?

Find your warmest path to Allyrae Wallace Educational Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 78 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph