Skip to content
Alline B & Chloe C Davis Charitable Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Alline B & Chloe C Davis Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$85k
Granted FY2024still arriving
36
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$163kHuman Services$132kYouth Development$93kHousing & Shelter$92kArts & Culture$78kPhilanthropy$52kEducation$36kFood & Nutrition$24kOther$0
02FY2024 · 36 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RIVERVIEW HOPE CAMPUS$5,000
RIVER VALLEY REGIONAL FOOD BANK$5,000
GOOD SAMARITAN CLINIC$5,000
FORT SMITH BOYS & GIRLS CLUB$5,000
GREGORY KISTLER TREATMENT CENTER$5,000
DONALD W REYNOLDS CANCER SUPPORT HOUSE$5,000
FORT SMITH MUSEUM OF HISTORY$4,000
CRISIS INTERVENTION CENTER$3,000
THE SALVATION ARMY$3,000
BOYS SHELTER OF FORT SMITH$3,000
GIRL'S SHELTER OF FORT SMITH INC$3,000
ANTIOCH YOUTH & FAMILY$2,700
FORT SMITH SYMPHONY$2,500
PROJECT COMPASSION INC$2,500
CLAYTON HOUSE$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $47k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%ABILITIES UNLIMITED OF FORT SMITH: $1k → 16%ABILITIES UNLIMITED OF FORT SMITH: $1k → 16%ABILITIES UNLIMITED OF FORT SMITH: $1k → 16%ABILITIES UNLIMITED OF FORT SMITH: $1k → 16%ABILITIES UNLIMITED OF FORT SMITH: $1k → 16%ABILITIES UNLIMITED OF FORT SMITH: $1k → 16%ABILITIES UNLIMITED OF FORT SMITH: $1k → 16%BOST INC: $2k → 17%BOST INC: $2k → 17%BOST INC: $1k → 17%BOST INC: $1k → 17%BOST INC: $500 → 17%BOST INC: $500 → 17%FORT SMITH CHILDREN'S EMERGENCY SHELTER: $5k → 17%CHILDREN'S EMERGENCY SHELTER: $5k → 17%CHILDREN'S EMERGENCY SHELTER: $3k → 17%CHILDREN'S EMERGENCY SHELTER: $3k → 17%CHILDREN'S EMERGENCY SHELTER: $3k → 17%CHILDREN'S EMERGENCY SHELTER: $3k → 17%CHILDREN'S EMERGENCY SHELTER: $3k → 17%LINCOLN CHILDCARE CENTER: $2k → 17%CHILDREN'S EMERGENCY SHELTER: $2k → 17%STEPS: $1k → 17%STEPS: $1k → 17%STEPS: $1k → 17%STEPS: $1k → 17%STEPS: $1k → 17%STEPS: $1k → 17%COMMUNITY RESCUE MISSION: $500 → 17%S T E P S: $500 → 17%S T E P S: $500 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$664k · 47 repeat orgs$19k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +18% since the first grant, against +13% for those funded once.

47 repeat relationships: 33 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

47
13

Total granted

$664k
$16k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+13%

Still filing today

51%
62%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesArts & CultureHealthYouth DevelopmentHousing & ShelterCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RH
    RIVERVIEW HOPE CAMPUS
    8× · 2017–2024 · $42k · revenue +69%
  • GS
    GOOD SAMARITAN CLINIC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $41k · revenue +69%
  • TG
    THE GREGORY KISTLER TREATMENT CENTER INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $36k · revenue +120%

Funded once

  • IC
    INTERFAITH COMMUNITY CENTER
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
  • LC
    LINCOLN CHILDCARE CENTER INC
    one grant, 2023 · $2k · revenue -1%
  • SA
    St Annes Society Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $2k · revenue +14%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Kitties & Kanines Shelter

Our mission is to provide non-lethal solutions to the homeless, abandoned, and feral animal population of fort smith, arkansas. we will do this through re-unifying animals with their owners, adopting animals to new families, or…

Animals
2
Fort Smith Children's Emergency Shelter Foundation Inc

To support the activities of the fort smith children's emergency shelter, inc. through education and philanthropic activities.

Human Services
3
Fort Smith Christian Family Servicesinc

From conception to birth and beyond, we uphold the sanctity of human life; sharing the gospel of jesus christ, offering knowledge, medical services and support.

Human Services
4
Boys Shelter Inc

To provide shelter, food, education, counseling, medical care, clothing and supplies to troubled boys in fort smith, arkansas and the surrounding area.

Community Improvement
5
Fort Smith Public Schools Found Inc

To enhance the quality of education in the fort smith public schools by providing the necessary funds for programs not otherwise funded by the fort smith public school district.

Philanthropy
6
Fort Smith Montessori School Inc

Education of students from three years through eighth grade.

Education
7
Northwest Arkansas Women's Shelter

The northwest arkansas women's shelter is committed to serving victims of domestic violence and sexual assault and empowering them to build lives free of violence.

Human Services
8
Fort Smith Chamber Educational Development Foundation Inc

Recruitment of jobs and capital investment in fort smith, ar

Community Improvement
9
The Arc of Smith County

The mission of the arc of smith county is to enhance the general welfare of persons with intellectual and development disabilities, throughout their lifetimes, by providing fully inclusive programs, services, education, advocacy, and…

—
10
Harbor House Inc of Fort Smith

To help individuals recover from alcohol and drug addictions

—
11
River Valley Primary Care Services

To provide quality comprehensive and preventative health care to all residents of the arkansas area without regard to their ability to pay.

Health
12
Disability Rights Arkansas Inc

To vigorously advocate for and enforce the legal rights of people with disabilities in arkansas.

Civil Rights
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Girls Incorporated of Fort Smith; the most unlike its peers is St Annes Society Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 63 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
32/33
Grantees still filing
20/33
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DONALD W REYNOLDS CANCER SUPPORT HOUSE: $40,000 · OtherDONALD W REYNOLDS CANCER SUPPORT HOUSEANTIOCH YOUTH & FAMILY: $27,800 · OtherANTIOCH YOUTH & FAMILYU A FORT SMITH FOUNDATION: $25,000 · OtherU A FORT SMITH FOUNDATIONUS MARSHALLS MUSEUM FOUNDATION: $24,900 · OtherUS MARSHALLS MUSEUM FOUNDATIONTHE SALVATION ARMY: $24,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYCRISIS INTERVENTION CENTER INC: $24,000 · OtherCRISIS INTERVENTION CENTER INCGIRLS' SHELTER OF FORT SMITH: $24,000 · OtherGIRLS' SHELTER OF FORT SMITHUNITED WAY OF FORT SMITH: $19,500 · OtherRIVER VALLEY REGIONAL FOOD BANK: $18,500 · OtherBOYS SHELTER OF FORT SMITH: $16,000 · Other+33 more: $134,200 · Other+33 moreGOOD SAMARITAN CLINIC: $41,000 · HealthGOOD SAMARITAN …THE GREGORY KISTLER TREATMENT CENTER INC: $36,000 · HealthTHE GREGORY KIS…PROJECT COMPASSION INC: $16,000 · HealthPROJECT COMPASS…+1 more: $1,500 · HealthFORT SMITH BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS: $34,000 · Youth DevelopmentFORT SMIT…GIRLS INCORPORATED OF FORT SMITH: $21,000 · Youth DevelopmentGIRLS INC…FORT SMITH CHILDREN'S EMERGENCY SHELTER: $24,500 · Human ServicesFORT SMIT…COMMUNITY RESCUE MISSION INC: $8,500 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY…ABILITIES UNLIMITED OF FORT SMITH INC: $7,000 · Human ServicesABILITIES…THE STEPS INC: $7,000 · Human ServicesTHE STEPS…BOST INC: $6,000 · Human ServicesBOST INCLINCOLN CHILDCARE CENTER INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesFORT SMITH MUSEUM OF HISTORY: $20,000 · Arts & CultureFORT SMITH SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION: $13,500 · Arts & CultureFORT SMITH ART CENTER INC: $9,000 · Arts & CultureCOMMUNITY SCHOOL OF THE ARTS: $4,000 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $1,000 · Arts & CultureRIVERVIEW HOPE CAMPUS: $41,500 · Housing & ShelterUNIVERSITY OF AR FT SMITH FOUNDATIONINC: $11,500 · Education
Other$377,900Health$94,500Youth Development$55,000Human Services$55,000Arts & Culture$47,500Housing & Shelter$41,500Education$11,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRIVERVIEW HOPE CAMPUS: $41,500 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetGOOD SAMARITAN CLINIC: $41,000 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetTHE GREGORY KISTLER TREATMENT CENTER INC: $36,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetFORT SMITH BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS: $34,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetFORT SMITH CHILDREN'S EMERGENCY SHELTER: $24,500 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetCRISIS INTERVENTION CENTER INC: $24,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetGIRLS' SHELTER OF FORT SMITH: $24,000 over 8y, 1.5% of budgetGIRLS INCORPORATED OF FORT SMITH: $21,000 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetFORT SMITH MUSEUM OF HISTORY: $20,000 over 8y, 1.5% of budgetPROJECT COMPASSION INC: $16,000 over 8y, 2.1% of budgetFORT SMITH SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION: $13,500 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF AR FT SMITH FOUNDATIONINC: $11,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFORT SMITH ART CENTER INC: $9,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY RESCUE MISSION INC: $8,500 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetABILITIES UNLIMITED OF FORT SMITH INC: $7,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ARC FOR THE RIVER VALLEY: $7,000 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetTHE STEPS INC: $7,000 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetBOST INC: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY SCHOOL OF THE ARTS: $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFORT SMITH HERITAGE FOUNDATION INC: $4,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetHEART TO HEART PREGNANCY SUPPORT CENTER INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY SERVICES CLEARINGHOUSE: $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLITERACY COUNCIL OF WESTERN ARKANSAS INC: $3,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetCASA OF CRAWFORD COUNTY INC: $2,200 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetLINCOLN CHILDCARE CENTER INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSt Annes Society Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF ARKANSAS & NORTH LOUISIANA INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSEBASTIAN COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetARKANSAS EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS NETWORK FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL INVENTORS HALL OF FAME INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds RIVERVIEW HOPE CAMPUS ↗
  • Who funds GOOD SAMARITAN CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds THE GREGORY KISTLER TREATMENT CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds FORT SMITH BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS ↗
  • Who funds FORT SMITH CHILDREN'S EMERGENCY SHELTER ↗
  • Who funds CRISIS INTERVENTION CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds GIRLS' SHELTER OF FORT SMITH ↗
  • Who funds GIRLS INCORPORATED OF FORT SMITH ↗
  • Who funds FORT SMITH MUSEUM OF HISTORY ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT COMPASSION INC ↗
  • Who funds FORT SMITH SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF AR FT SMITH FOUNDATIONINC ↗
  • Who funds FORT SMITH ART CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY RESCUE MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds ABILITIES UNLIMITED OF FORT SMITH INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ARC FOR THE RIVER VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds THE STEPS INC ↗
  • Who funds BOST INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY SCHOOL OF THE ARTS ↗
  • Who funds FORT SMITH HERITAGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HEART TO HEART PREGNANCY SUPPORT CENTER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Elizabeth H & Stanley…William Thomas & May …Arkansas Community Fo…Walter O Caldwell Fou…Arvest FoundationThe Griffin Charitabl…Maurras Family Charit…Doss T Sutton Charita…United Way of Fort Sm…Rosalie Tilles Childr…Windgate Charitable F…Cadence Bank Foundati…
Elizabeth H & Stanley E Evans Charitable FoundationAR56× affinity24 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Elizabeth H & Stanley E Evans Charitable Foundation · William Thomas & May Pitman Hennessy Foundation · Arkansas Community Foundation Inc · Walter O Caldwell Foundation · Arvest Foundation · The Griffin Charitable Organization · Maurras Family Charitable Trust · Doss T Sutton Charitable Foundation Mark Barr and Joe Powers · United Way of Fort Smith Area Inc · Rosalie Tilles Childrens Home Inc · Windgate Charitable Foundation Inc · Cadence Bank Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Alline B & Chloe C Davis Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Alline B & Chloe C Davis Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Alline B & Chloe C Davis Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Alline B & Chloe C Davis Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 63 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Alline B & Chloe C Davis’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home