Skip to content
Allibhoy-Khaishgi Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Allibhoy-Khaishgi Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$192k
Granted FY2024still arriving
20
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$77k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Education$391kInternational$69kScience & Tech$5kPublic Safety & Disaster$5kCivil Rights$3kHealth$1kCrime & Legal$1kPhilanthropy$500Other$0
02FY2024 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k13 grants · $27k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $88k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $77k
$5,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$4.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$77,125
AGA KHAN FOUNDATION USA$25,000
MARET SCHOOL$17,500
AMERICANS FOR OXFORD$15,500
AMERICAN NEAR EAST REFUGEE AID$10,000
CAF AMERICA$10,000
IQRA FUND$10,000
MALALA FUND$5,000
WORD CENTRAL KITCHEN$5,000
EDHI FOUNDATION$5,000
ASPIRE INSTITUTE$2,500
TOSTAN$2,500
WELLESLEY COLLEGE$2,500
SIUT NORTH AMERICA$1,000
HUMAN TRAFFICKING LEGAL CENTER$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY22–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 35% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WELLESLEY COLLEGE: $3k → 7%ASPIRE INSTITUTE: $10k → 8%I-CARE FUND AMERICA: $1k → 16%EDHI FOUNDATION: $5k → 13%AMERICANS FOR OXFORD: $16k → 17%TORCH LITERARY ARTS: $75 → 10%TCF USA: $77k → 16%AGA KHAN FOUNDATION USA: $25k → 14%TUNSTALL FOUNDATION: $52 → 14%AMERICAN TRUST FOR OXFORD UNIVERSIT: $315k → 6%CAF AMERICA: $10k → 9%WELLESLEY COLLEGE: $500 → 7%PRESIDENT & FELLOWS HARVARD COLLEGE: $5k → 8%AMERICANS FOR OXFORD: $10k → 17%TCF USA: $8k → 16%AMERICAN NEAR EAST REFUGEE AID: $10k → 14%CAF AMERICA: $5k → 9%ASPIRE INSTITUTE: $3k → 8%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $3k → 17%TCF USA: $3k → 16%HUMAN TRAFFICKING LEGAL CENTER: $1k → 14%TOSTAN: $3k → 9%SIUT NORTH AMERICA: $1k → 16%AMERICAN UNIVERSITY OF IRAQ: $1k → 14%WORD CENTRAL KITCHEN: $5k → 14%MARET SCHOOL: $18k → 14%MARET SCHOOL: $8k → 14%MARET SCHOOL: $2k → 14%PHOEBE HEARST SCHOOL PTA: $750 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

29%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$157k · 6 repeat orgs$385k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +26% since the first grant, against +23% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
4

Total granted

$157k
$319k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+23%

Still filing today

83%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $66k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
InternationalEducationPhilanthropyHealthCrime & LegalArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MS
    MARET SCHOOL INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $27k · revenue +1%
  • AF
    AMERICANS FOR OXFORD INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $26k · revenue +30%
  • AI
    Aspire Institute Inc
    2× · 2023–2024 · $13k · revenue +191%

Funded once

  • AT
    AMERICAN TRUST FOR OXFORD UNIVERSIT
    one grant, 2023 · $315k
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    one grant, 2023 · $3k · revenue +1%
  • PH
    PHOEBE HEARST SCHOOL PTA
    one grant, 2022 · $750
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
2
The Asia Foundation

The asia foundation (taf) is an international nonprofit organization working to solve the toughest social and economic challenges in asia and the pacific. (continued on schedule o)

International
3
Trustees of Tufts College

Education and Research

Education
4
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
5
Alight

Alight builds a meaningful life for and with the displaced. not simply addressing basic needs, but building a life filled with joy, dignity, connection, and purpose. we walk with them along their entire journey of displacement and deliver…

International
6
American Association of University Women Inc

Aauw advances gender equity for women and girls through research, education, and advocacy.

Education
7
Friends of the American University of Afghanistan

Friends of the american university of afghanistan (fauaf) is a 501(c)(3) public charity that advances higher education for afghan students by funding academic operations, scholarships, extracurricular activities, and bridge programming at…

International
8
Fajr Scientific

To provide multi-specialty surgical care, humanitarian aid and educational support to people in low- and middle-income countries.

Science & Tech
9
International Crisis Group

Crisis group works to prevent and resolve deadly conflict around the world by informing and influencing the perceptions and actions of policymakers and other key conflict actors. to this end, we endeavour to talk to all sides and provide…

International
10
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
11
American University of Armenia Corporation

Support of the educational and research activities of the american university of armenia (aua).

Education
12
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Tostan Inc; the most unlike its peers is Tunstall Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/21
Grantees still filing
12/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AMERICAN TRUST FOR OXFORD UNIVERSIT: $315,000 · OtherAMERICAN TRUST FOR OXFORD UNIVERSITIndividual grant recipient: $87,825 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+4 more: $2,302 · OtherAGA KHAN FOUNDATION USA: $25,000 · InternationalAGA KHAN FOUND…Aspire Institute Inc: $12,500 · InternationalAspire Institu…IQRA Fund: $10,000 · InternationalIQRA FundAMERICAN NEAR EAST REFUGEE AID: $10,000 · InternationalAMERICAN NEAR …ABDUL SATTAR EDHI INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · InternationalABDUL SATTAR E…WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $5,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL …MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $3,000 · InternationalTOSTAN INC: $2,500 · International+1 more: $1,000 · InternationalMARET SCHOOL INC: $27,322 · EducationMARET SCHOOL …AMERICANS FOR OXFORD INC: $25,500 · EducationAMERICANS FOR…President and Fellows of Harvard College: $5,000 · EducationPresident and…THE MALALA FUND: $5,000 · EducationTHE MALALA FU…Wellesley College: $3,000 · EducationCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA: $15,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $500 · PhilanthropySIUT NORTH AMERICA INC: $1,000 · HealthTHE HUMAN TRAFFICKING LEGAL CENTER: $1,000 · Crime & LegalTORCH LITERARY ARTS: $75 · Arts & Culture
Other$405,127International$74,000Education$65,822Philanthropy$15,500Health$1,000Crime & Legal$1,000Arts & Culture$75

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMARET SCHOOL INC: $27,322 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICANS FOR OXFORD INC: $25,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAGA KHAN FOUNDATION USA: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAspire Institute Inc: $12,500 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetIQRA Fund: $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetAMERICAN NEAR EAST REFUGEE AID: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetABDUL SATTAR EDHI INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MALALA FUND: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWellesley College: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTOSTAN INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetI-CARE FUND AMERICA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSIUT NORTH AMERICA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HUMAN TRAFFICKING LEGAL CENTER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMARGARET MCNAMARA EDUCATION GRANTS: $500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetVISIONSPRING INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTORCH LITERARY ARTS: $75 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way WorldwideNational Philanthropi…ImpactassetsincShell USA Company Fou…Verizon FoundationThe Blackbaud Giving …The Pfizer Foundation…Charities Aid Foundat…American Online Givin…Paypal Charitable Giv…Vanguard Charitable E…American Endowment Fo…
United Way WorldwideVA13.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way Worldwide · National Philanthropic Trust · Impactassetsinc · Shell USA Company Foundation · Verizon Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Allibhoy-Khaishgi Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Allibhoy-Khaishgi Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
  • Wellesley College: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Allibhoy-Khaishgi Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home