· Private foundation
Allibhoy-Khaishgi Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2022–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k13 grants · $27k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $88k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $77k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Individual grant recipient | $77,125 |
| AGA KHAN FOUNDATION USA | $25,000 |
| MARET SCHOOL | $17,500 |
| AMERICANS FOR OXFORD | $15,500 |
| CAF AMERICA | $10,000 |
| IQRA FUND | $10,000 |
| AMERICAN NEAR EAST REFUGEE AID | $10,000 |
| EDHI FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| WORD CENTRAL KITCHEN | $5,000 |
| MALALA FUND | $5,000 |
| TOSTAN | $2,500 |
| ASPIRE INSTITUTE | $2,500 |
| WELLESLEY COLLEGE | $2,500 |
| I-CARE FUND AMERICA | $1,000 |
| AMERICAN UNIVERSITY OF IRAQ | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY22–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 35% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +26% since the first grant, against +23% for the ones you funded once.
6 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $66k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MSMARET SCHOOL INC3× · 2022–2024 · $27k · revenue +1%
- AFAMERICANS FOR OXFORD INC2× · 2023–2024 · $26k · revenue +30%
- AIAspire Institute Inc2× · 2023–2024 · $13k · revenue +191%
Funded once
- ATAMERICAN TRUST FOR OXFORD UNIVERSITone grant, 2023 · $315k
MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INCone grant, 2023 · $3k · revenue +1%- PHPHOEBE HEARST SCHOOL PTAone grant, 2022 · $750
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
The asia foundation (taf) is an international nonprofit organization working to solve the toughest social and economic challenges in asia and the pacific. (continued on schedule o)
Education and Research
Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…
Alight builds a meaningful life for and with the displaced. not simply addressing basic needs, but building a life filled with joy, dignity, connection, and purpose. we walk with them along their entire journey of displacement and deliver…
Aauw advances gender equity for women and girls through research, education, and advocacy.
Friends of the american university of afghanistan (fauaf) is a 501(c)(3) public charity that advances higher education for afghan students by funding academic operations, scholarships, extracurricular activities, and bridge programming at…
To provide multi-specialty surgical care, humanitarian aid and educational support to people in low- and middle-income countries.
Crisis group works to prevent and resolve deadly conflict around the world by informing and influencing the perceptions and actions of policymakers and other key conflict actors. to this end, we endeavour to talk to all sides and provide…
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
Support of the educational and research activities of the american university of armenia (aua).
Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Tostan Inc and the most unlike its peers is Tunstall Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MARET SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICANS FOR OXFORD INC ↗
- Who funds AGA KHAN FOUNDATION USA ↗
- Who funds CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA ↗
- Who funds Aspire Institute Inc ↗
- Who funds IQRA Fund ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN NEAR EAST REFUGEE AID ↗
- Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
- Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds THE MALALA FUND ↗
- Who funds ABDUL SATTAR EDHI INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Wellesley College ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds TOSTAN INC ↗
- Who funds I-CARE FUND AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds SIUT NORTH AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds THE HUMAN TRAFFICKING LEGAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds MARGARET MCNAMARA EDUCATION GRANTS ↗
- Who funds VISIONSPRING INC ↗
- Who funds TORCH LITERARY ARTS ↗
- Who funds TUNSTALL FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: United Way Worldwide · National Philanthropic Trust · Impactassetsinc · Shell USA Company Foundation · Verizon Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Allibhoy-Khaishgi Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
- Wellesley College — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.