Skip to content

· Public charity

Alliance of Coalitions for Healthy Communities

Empowering healthy communities through innovative prevention, wellness, and recovery support.

$832k
Granted FY2025still arriving
22
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$38k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$3.4MYouth Development$1.3MHuman Services$326kEducation$301kCommunity Improvement$295kPublic Benefit$275kPhilanthropy$117kFood & Nutrition$81kOther$0
02FY2025 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 22 grants below total $812,645, the rows itemized in this filing. The $832,201 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $19,556 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$38,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HURON VALLEY COMMUNITY COALITION$38,000
HOLLY AREA COMMUNITY COALITION$38,000
WATERFORD COALITION FOR YOUTH$38,000
BRANDON PREVENTION COALITION$38,000
MADISON HEIGHTS COMMUNITY COALITION$38,000
BIRMINGHAM BLOOMFIELD COMMUNITY$38,000
NOVI COMMUNITY COALITION$38,000
ROCHESTER COMMUNITY COALITION$38,000
HAZEL PARK COMMUNITY COALITION$38,000
TROY COMMUNITY COALITION$38,000
NORTH OAKLAND COMMUNITY COALITION$38,000
ROYAL OAK PREVENTION COALITION$38,000
TRI COMMUNITY COALITION$37,998
GREATER WEST BLOOMFIELD COMMUNITY$37,996
CLAWSON COMMUNITY COALITION$37,990
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $669k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%SOUTHEAST OAKLAND COALITION: $51k → 8%SOUTHEAST OAKLAND COALITION: $41k → 8%SOUTHEAST OAKLAND COALITION: $41k → 8%SOUTHEAST OAKLAND COALITION: $41k → 8%SOUTHEAST OAKLAND COALITION: $41k → 8%SOUTHEAST OAKLAND COALITION: $38k → 8%SOUTHEAST OAKLAND COALITION: $38k → 8%SOUTHEAST OAKLAND COALITION: $38k → 8%SOUTHEAST OAKLAND COALITION: $36k → 8%EASTER SEALS-MICHIGAN INC: $42k → 8%EASTER SEALS-MICHIGAN INC: $39k → 8%EASTER SEALS-MICHIGAN INC: $38k → 8%EASTER SEALS-MICHIGAN INC: $38k → 8%EASTER SEALS-MICHIGAN INC: $38k → 8%EASTER SEALS-MICHIGAN INC: $38k → 8%EASTER SEALS-MICHIGAN INC: $38k → 8%EASTER SEALS-MICHIGAN INC: $34k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.8M · 24 repeat orgs$65k to everyone else

24 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
1

Total granted

$6.8M
$36k

Still filing today

50%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $29k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    TRI-COMMUNITY COALITION OF BERKLEY HUNTINGTON WOODS AND OAK PARK MI
    9× · 2017–2025 · $356k · revenue +30% · 49% of their budget
  • GW
    GREATER WEST BLOOMFIELD COMMUNITY COALITION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $355k · revenue +43% · 50% of their budget
  • NO
    NORTH OAKLAND COMMUNITY COALITION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $352k · revenue +352% · 41% of their budget

Funded once

  • WL
    WHITE LAKE COMMUNITY COALITION
    one grant, 2017 · $36k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Henry County Prevention Coalition

Empowering the community through prevention, education, and leadership roles in reducing alcohol, tobacco, illegal drugs, and other harmful behaviors amoung our youth and families

Education
2
Lynnfield Substance Abuse Prevention Coalition Inc

The mission of "A Healthy Lynnfield" (Lynnfield Substance Abuse Prevention Coalition Inc) is to address the epidemic of drug and alcohol abuse in our community through education, advocacy, environmental changes, and promoting and creating…

Health
3
Hamilton County Coalition

Facilitate safe healthy drug free communities through comprehensive strategies and community based collaborations both private and governmental primary target is young people.

Human Services
4
Martin County Substance Abuse Prevention Coalition

Martin county substance abuse coalition's (mcsap) mission is to prevent underage use and abuse of alcohol, marijuana, and other drugs in martin county, minnesota. mcsap primarily works to share resources, ideas and information to raise…

Health
5
Montcalm Prevention Collaborative

To reduce youth substance misuse.

Health
6
Livonia Save Our Youth Coalition

Substance Use Disorder (SUD) prevention - regarding the health and safety of our young people with a focus on alcohol and other drugs.

Youth Development
7
Youth-Coalition-Inc

Providing tutoring and mentoring to local youth

Crime & Legal
8
Franklin County Caring Communities Inc

Community Coalition focusing on population level health changes through creation of public health policy community education about alcohol cannabis and other drugs creating opportunities for youth leadership.

Youth Development
9
Preventing Tobacco Addiction
Health
10
Pelham Community Coalition

Group of individuals seeking to inform, empower, and activate members of the Pelham community in regards to Substance Use Disorder within our community and especially among our youth.

Education
11
Central Mississippi Prevention Services Inc

To provide powerful and effective science-based prevention services to youth ages 5-17 through homework assistance, tutoring, and after school programs and summer camp activities utilizing certified teachers and youth counselors, licensed…

Human Services
12
Soundcheck Prevention Network

Soundcheck is inspired by students of all ages and experiences who express a genuine desire to be healthy, support their peers, learn unbiased facts about alcohol and other drugs, and play an active role in their school's prevention…

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is North Oakland Community Coalition; the most unlike its peers is Novi Community Coalition. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

11
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/15
Grantees still filing
9/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HURON VALLEY COMMUNITY COALITION: $365,305 · OtherHURON VALLEY COMMUNITY COALITIONWATERFORD COALITION FOR YOUTH: $344,438 · OtherWATERFORD COALITION FOR YOUTHROCHESTER COMMUNITY COALITION: $339,000 · OtherROCHESTER COMMUNITY COALITIONROYAL OAK PREVENTION COALITION: $333,001 · OtherROYAL OAK PREVENTION COALITIONCLARKSTON COALITION FOR YOUTH: $326,380 · OtherCLARKSTON COALITION FOR YOUTHCLAWSON COMMUNITY COALITION: $312,917 · OtherCLAWSON COMMUNITY COALITIONHAZEL PARK COMMUNITY COALITION: $311,545 · OtherHAZEL PARK COMMUNITY COALITIONSOUTH LYON COMMUNITY COALITION: $229,444 · OtherSOUTH LYON COMMUNITY COALITIONBRANDON PREVENTION COALITION: $161,000 · OtherBRANDON PREVENTION COALITION+5 more: $286,181 · Other+5 moreTROY COMMUNITY COALITION FOR THE PREVENTION OF DRUG & ALCOHOL ABUSE: $372,500 · HealthTROY COMMUNITY COALIT…TRI-COMMUNITY COALITION OF BERKLEY HUNTINGTON WOODS AND OAK PARK MI: $355,559 · HealthTRI-COMMUNITY COALITI…NORTH OAKLAND COMMUNITY COALITION: $351,695 · HealthNORTH OAKLAND COMMUNI…LAKES AREA COMMUNITY COALITION: $269,912 · HealthLAKES AREA COMMUNITY …BIRMINGHAM BLOOMFIELD COMMUNITY COALITION: $332,591 · Community ImprovementBIRMINGHAM BLO…Novi Community Coalition: $317,653 · Community ImprovementNovi Community…PONTIAC COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $154,708 · Community ImprovementPONTIAC COMMUN…GREATER PONTIAC COMMUNITY COALITION: $107,494 · Community ImprovementGREATER PONTIA…GREATER WEST BLOOMFIELD COMMUNITY COALITION: $354,921 · EducationGREATER WES…MADISON HEIGHTS COMMUNITY COALITION: $338,983 · EducationMADISON HEI…SOUTHEAST OAKLAND COALITION: $363,827 · Human ServicesSOUTHEAST …EASTERSEALS MORC HEALTH CARE INC: $305,089 · Human ServicesEASTERSEAL…HOLLY AREA COMMUNITY COALITION: $342,919 · Youth Development
Other$3,009,211Health$1,349,666Community Improvement$912,446Education$693,904Human Services$668,916Youth Development$342,919

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTROY COMMUNITY COALITION FOR THE PREVENTION OF DRUG & ALCOHOL ABUSE: $372,500 over 9y, 36% of budgetSOUTHEAST OAKLAND COALITION: $363,827 over 9y, 47% of budgetTRI-COMMUNITY COALITION OF BERKLEY HUNTINGTON WOODS AND OAK PARK MI: $355,559 over 9y, 49% of budgetGREATER WEST BLOOMFIELD COMMUNITY COALITION: $354,921 over 9y, 50% of budgetNORTH OAKLAND COMMUNITY COALITION: $351,695 over 9y, 41% of budgetWATERFORD COALITION FOR YOUTH: $344,438 over 9y, 61% of budgetHOLLY AREA COMMUNITY COALITION: $342,919 over 9y, 20% of budgetMADISON HEIGHTS COMMUNITY COALITION: $338,983 over 9y, 85% of budgetROYAL OAK PREVENTION COALITION: $333,001 over 9y, 97% of budgetBIRMINGHAM BLOOMFIELD COMMUNITY COALITION: $332,591 over 9y, 33% of budgetNovi Community Coalition: $317,653 over 8y, 23% of budgetEASTERSEALS MORC HEALTH CARE INC: $305,089 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetLAKES AREA COMMUNITY COALITION: $269,912 over 7y, 79% of budgetPONTIAC COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $154,708 over 4y, 3.7% of budgetGREATER PONTIAC COMMUNITY COALITION: $107,494 over 3y, 29% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TROY COMMUNITY COALITION FOR THE PREVENTION OF DRUG & ALCOHOL ABUSE ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHEAST OAKLAND COALITION ↗
  • Who funds TRI-COMMUNITY COALITION OF BERKLEY HUNTINGTON WOODS AND OAK PARK MI ↗
  • Who funds GREATER WEST BLOOMFIELD COMMUNITY COALITION ↗
  • Who funds NORTH OAKLAND COMMUNITY COALITION ↗
  • Who funds WATERFORD COALITION FOR YOUTH ↗
  • Who funds HOLLY AREA COMMUNITY COALITION ↗
  • Who funds MADISON HEIGHTS COMMUNITY COALITION ↗
  • Who funds ROYAL OAK PREVENTION COALITION ↗
  • Who funds BIRMINGHAM BLOOMFIELD COMMUNITY COALITION ↗
  • Who funds Novi Community Coalition ↗
  • Who funds EASTERSEALS MORC HEALTH CARE INC ↗
  • Who funds LAKES AREA COMMUNITY COALITION ↗
  • Who funds PONTIAC COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GREATER PONTIAC COMMUNITY COALITION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA1.2× affinity7 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Alliance of Coalitions for Healthy Communities funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Alliance of Coalitions for Healthy Communities. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Alliance of Coalitions for Healthy Communities?

    Find your warmest path to Alliance of Coalitions for Healthy Communities through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Alliance of Coalitions for Healthy Communities’ filings →

    More from the funding graph