· Public charity
Alliance of Coalitions for Healthy Communities
Empowering healthy communities through innovative prevention, wellness, and recovery support.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 42% of ALLIANCE OF COALITIONS FOR HEALTHY COMMUNITIES’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| TROY COMMUNITY COALITION | $48,500 |
| SOUTH LYON COMMUNITY COALITION | $48,118 |
| GREATER WEST BLOOMFIELD COMMUNITY | $47,928 |
| TRI COMMUNITY COALITION | $47,672 |
| ROCHESTER COMMUNITY COALITION | $41,000 |
| SOUTHEAST OAKLAND COALITION | $41,000 |
| BRANDON PREVENTION COALITION | $41,000 |
| WATERFORD COALITION FOR YOUTH | $41,000 |
| ROYAL OAK PREVENTION COALITION | $41,000 |
| CLAWSON COMMUNITY COALITION | $41,000 |
| MADISON HEIGHTS COMMUNITY COALITION | $40,983 |
| HURON VALLEY COMMUNITY COALITION | $40,905 |
| PONTIAC COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $39,365 |
| NOVI COMMUNITY COALITION | $38,211 |
| HOLLY AREA COMMUNITY COALITION | $38,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $593k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
23 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $37k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TCTROY COMMUNITY COALITION FOR THE PREVENTION OF DRUG & ALCOHOL ABUSE8× · 2017–2024 · $335k · revenue +24% · 36% of their budget
- TCTRI-COMMUNITY COALITION OF BERKLEY HUNTINGTON WOODS AND OAK PARK MI8× · 2017–2024 · $318k · revenue +30% · 49% of their budget
- GWGREATER WEST BLOOMFIELD COMMUNITY COALITION8× · 2017–2024 · $317k · revenue +43% · 50% of their budget
Funded once
- WLWHITE LAKE COMMUNITY COALITIONone grant, 2017 · $36k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Empowering the community through prevention, education, and leadership roles in reducing alcohol, tobacco, illegal drugs, and other harmful behaviors amoung our youth and families
Facilitate safe healthy drug free communities through comprehensive strategies and community based collaborations both private and governmental primary target is young people.
The mission of "A Healthy Lynnfield" (Lynnfield Substance Abuse Prevention Coalition Inc) is to address the epidemic of drug and alcohol abuse in our community through education, advocacy, environmental changes, and promoting and creating…
Substance Use Disorder (SUD) prevention - regarding the health and safety of our young people with a focus on alcohol and other drugs.
To reduce youth substance misuse.
Baker prevention coalition, inc. seeks to educate and communicate with the general public, community organizations and community-serving organizations that work with youth, to eliminate drugs, tobacco and alcohol use and at the same time…
Martin county substance abuse coalition's (mcsap) mission is to prevent underage use and abuse of alcohol, marijuana, and other drugs in martin county, minnesota. mcsap primarily works to share resources, ideas and information to raise…
Providing tutoring and mentoring to local youth
Soundcheck is inspired by students of all ages and experiences who express a genuine desire to be healthy, support their peers, learn unbiased facts about alcohol and other drugs, and play an active role in their school's prevention…
To reduce the impact of alcohol and other drug abuse in the kenosha community by providing education, prevention, intervention and referral services.
To provide powerful and effective science-based prevention services to youth ages 5-17 through homework assistance, tutoring, and after school programs and summer camp activities utilizing certified teachers and youth counselors, licensed…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is North Oakland Community Coalition and the most unlike its peers is Novi Community Coalition. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds TROY COMMUNITY COALITION FOR THE PREVENTION OF DRUG & ALCOHOL ABUSE ↗
- Who funds SOUTHEAST OAKLAND COALITION ↗
- Who funds TRI-COMMUNITY COALITION OF BERKLEY HUNTINGTON WOODS AND OAK PARK MI ↗
- Who funds GREATER WEST BLOOMFIELD COMMUNITY COALITION ↗
- Who funds NORTH OAKLAND COMMUNITY COALITION ↗
- Who funds WATERFORD COALITION FOR YOUTH ↗
- Who funds HOLLY AREA COMMUNITY COALITION ↗
- Who funds MADISON HEIGHTS COMMUNITY COALITION ↗
- Who funds ROYAL OAK PREVENTION COALITION ↗
- Who funds BIRMINGHAM BLOOMFIELD COMMUNITY COALITION ↗
- Who funds Novi Community Coalition ↗
- Who funds LAKES AREA COMMUNITY COALITION ↗
- Who funds EASTERSEALS MORC HEALTH CARE INC ↗
- Who funds PONTIAC COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GREATER PONTIAC COMMUNITY COALITION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Alliance of Coalitions for Healthy Communities funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Alliance of Coalitions for Healthy Communities?
Find your warmest path to Alliance of Coalitions for Healthy Communities through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.