Loading…
· Private foundation
ALLES FOUNDATION INCORPORATED
This foundation does not accept unsolicited requests — it funds preselected organizations.
$77k
Granted FY2025
17
Grants
4
Communities
$22k
Largest
01What you fund
01
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 94% of ALLES FOUNDATION INCORPORATED’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2020
outreach ministriesshelter poorchurchfood poor
2021
shelter poorfood poor
2022
vincent depaulshelter poorfood poor
2023
religious ministryshelter poorumc
2024
ministries
2025
ministries
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2025 · 17 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k15 grants · $45k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $32k
$2,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
- MATER DEI HIGH SCHOOL$22,000
- POSEY COUNTY FAIR BOARD ASSN$10,000
- ST BONIFACE CHURCH$9,000
- MARIAN EDUCATIONAL OUTREACH$7,000
- VETERANS HONOR FLIGHT OF SW INDIANA$5,000
- SMILE ON DOWNS SYNDROME$5,000
- WESTSIDE CATHOLIC SCHOOL$5,000
- ANDREW WOMACK MINISTRIES$2,500
- FJ REITZ HIGH SCHOOL$2,000
- METHODIST YOUTH HOME$2,000
- RIDING HOPE$2,000
- ARC OF EVANSVILLE$1,000
- CATHOLIC MINISTRIES APPEAL$1,000
- CHRISTIAN MOTORCYCLISTS ASSN$1,000
- KAIROS MINISTRIES$1,000
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $23k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14% — the area typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
81%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$402k · 34 repeat orgs$92k to everyone else
34 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
34
42
Total granted
$402k
$76k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+32%
+52%
Still filing today
9%
21%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterReligionOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MEMARIAN EDUCATIONAL OUTREACH5× · 2021–2025 · $13k · revenue +57%
- JVJACOBS VILLAGE2× · 2020–2024 · $10k · revenue +32%
- CMCHRISTIAN MOTORCYCLISTS ASSN5× · 2021–2025 · $5k · revenue +20%
Funded once
- MCMUSKINGHAM CO COMM FDNone grant, 2021 · $5k
- MFMAREN FUNDgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +26%
- CUCENTRAL UNITED METHODIST CHURCHone grant, 2020 · $5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
The Christian Home for Children Inc
Christian Home for Children, also known as Family Life Services, facilitates life transformation for single moms and their children through faith-based community. This is accomplished through a resident program and a community outreach…
—
2
Changed Lives Christian Center Inc
To take human beings who are presently homeless and weave them back into society by assisting with housing, jobs, meals, and access to betterment programs.
Human Services
3
Christian Services Inc
Improving the quality of life for families and children by eliminating barriers to opportunity
Human Services
4
His House Inc
His house children's home is a faith-based organization that restores the lives of children and families.
—
5
Christian Church Homes
The organization was formed to acquire, develop and manage quality affordable housing where residents can thrive.
—
6
Christ Church Day Care Inc
Provide care for up to 58 children, ages 6 weeks to five years of age, monday through friday year round.
Education
7
Casa Viva
Promote Christian child care and foster care networks
International
8
Magnificat Houses Inc
Magnificat Houses, Inc. offers a welcoming community where those needing housing, food and mental health programs can grow in stability, productivity and independence.
Health
9
Indiana United Methodist Children's
To meet the special needs of each child and family served in order to help improve their quality of life. the board of trustees and staff members of the home are committed to bringing the highest quality resources available to the…
Human Services
10
Catholic Human Services Inc
To enhance the lives of those we serve by providing hope-filled social, emotional and spiritual support to all people.
Human Services
11
Christian Homes of Abilene Inc
To change lives and build Christian families through maternity, foster, and adoption services.
Human Services
12
Christian Church Day Care Center
To provide quality child care for families in need of such a service at a reasonable rate
—
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Methodist Children's Home and the most unlike its peers is Parenting Time Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
12 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Other$461,150Human Services$23,000Religion$6,000Housing & Shelter$3,000
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Welborn Baptist Foundation IncIN24.6× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Welborn Baptist Foundation Inc · Evansville Endowment Fund Inc · Cecil a and Mabel Lene Hamman Foundation Inc · Community Foundation Alliance Inc · Holiday Management Foundation · Mamie L Young Charitable Trust Xxx-Xx-Xxxx · The Bower-Suhrheinrich Foundation Fifth Third · Centerpoint Energy Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation ALLES FOUNDATION INCORPORATED funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: MAREN FUND.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
insufficient risk
Limited financial data in public filings.
Track record & reputation
low risk
7 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 453951765 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on MAREN FUND, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 3% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Alles Foundation Incorporated?
Find your warmest path to Alles Foundation Incorporated through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines