· Private foundation
Alles Foundation Incorporated
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k15 grants · $45k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $32k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MATER DEI HIGH SCHOOL | $22,000 |
| POSEY COUNTY FAIR BOARD ASSN | $10,000 |
| ST BONIFACE CHURCH | $9,000 |
| MARIAN EDUCATIONAL OUTREACH | $7,000 |
| WESTSIDE CATHOLIC SCHOOL | $5,000 |
| VETERANS HONOR FLIGHT OF SW INDIANA | $5,000 |
| SMILE ON DOWNS SYNDROME | $5,000 |
| ANDREW WOMACK MINISTRIES | $2,500 |
| FJ REITZ HIGH SCHOOL | $2,000 |
| METHODIST YOUTH HOME | $2,000 |
| RIDING HOPE | $2,000 |
| ISAIAH 1 17 PROJECT | $1,000 |
| CHRISTIAN MOTORCYCLISTS ASSN | $1,000 |
| KAIROS MINISTRIES | $1,000 |
| ARC OF EVANSVILLE | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $31k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
34 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MEMARIAN EDUCATIONAL OUTREACH5× · 2021–2025 · $13k · revenue +37%
- JVJacobs Village Inc2× · 2020–2024 · $10k · revenue +39%
- CMCHRISTIAN MOTORCYCLISTS ASSOCIATION INC5× · 2021–2025 · $5k · revenue +2%
Funded once
- MCMUSKINGHAM CO COMM FDNone grant, 2021 · $5k
- CUCENTRAL UNITED METHODIST CHURCHone grant, 2020 · $5k
- MFMAREN FUND INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +65%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide adoption, counseling services, and refugee assistance
To prevent childhood deprivation of families in Lancaster County, SC by meeting basic nutritional needs, providing Christmas assistance and workplace training and literacy
The provision of affordable housing and services to the elderly and infirm in need of skilled and intermediate nursing care and independent living
To promote Christian child care and foster care networks in developing nations
Adoption, maternity & parenting services, family & individual counseling, children's support groups
To provide counseling and assisstance with housing needs for clients located in the evansville, in area under guidelines established by the housing and urban development provisions.
Cch builds and manages quality affordable housing in caring communities.
Sheltered home environment
To take human beings who are presently homeless and weave them back into society by assisting with housing, jobs, meals, and access to betterment programs.
Group Homes
Victory Center Ministries is dedicated to providing services for families, men, and women with children in need. Most importantly, a caring and supportive environment is provided where lives are changed and individuals regain their…
Serve food to families and individuals in need.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Methodist Children's Home and the most unlike its peers is Parenting Time Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 21. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 79 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MARIAN EDUCATIONAL OUTREACH ↗
- Who funds Jacobs Village Inc ↗
- Who funds MAREN FUND INC ↗
- Who funds HOUSE OF BREAD AND PEACE INC ↗
- Who funds CHRISTIAN MOTORCYCLISTS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds The Isaiah 117 Project Inc ↗
- Who funds RIVER BEND FOOD PANTRY ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE BOARD ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Welborn Baptist Foundation Inc · Cecil a and Mabel Lene Hamman Foundation Inc · Community Foundation Alliance Inc · Evansville Endowment Fund Inc · Koch Foundation Inc · Centerpoint Energy Foundation Inc · Holiday Management Foundation · The Bower-Suhrheinrich Foundation Fifth Third · Mamie L Young Charitable Trust Xxx-Xx-Xxxx · Edward Love Foundation · West Side Nut Club Inc · Baird Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Alles Foundation Incorporated funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.