Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Allen P and Josephine B Green

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$695k
Granted FY2025still arriving
44
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 52% of ALLEN P AND JOSEPHINE B GREEN’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 44 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $59k
  • $10k–50k33 grants · $637k
$17,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$15M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HELP CENTER INC$30,000
HANDI-SHOP INC$30,000
MAINSTREET MEXICO$29,000
BIRTHDAY BLESSINGS$28,000
COYOTE HILL$25,000
CENTRAL MISSOURI HUMANE SOCIETY$25,000
MEXICO 21ST CENTURY FUND INC$25,000
FOOD BANK FOR CENTRAL AND NORTHEAST MISSOURI INC$25,000
CHAMP ASSISTANCE DOGS INC$20,000
INDEPENDENT LIVING CENTER OF MID-MISSOURI INC$20,000
OATS INC$20,000
SERVE INC$20,000
HEART OF MISSOURI CASA$20,000
BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA GREAT RIVERS COUNCIL$20,000
MISSOURI COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION INC$20,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $889k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 74% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOMES AND SERVICES: $10k → 10%LEAST OF THESE INC: $10k → 8%GATEWAY REGION YMCA: $20k → 9%CENTRAL MISSOURI FOSTER CARE & ADOPTION ASSOC: $20k → 10%HANNIBAL AREA COUNCIL OF AGING: $10k → 12%LIVE 2 GIVE HOPE: $18k → 15%THE COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP: $10k → 16%COYOTE HILL: $25k → 17%BIRTHDAY BLESSINGS: $28k → 19%LEAST OF THESE INC: $10k → 8%JEFFERSON CITY AREA COMMUNITY SERVICES: $15k → 10%COYOTE HILL CHRISTIAN CHILDREN'S HOME: $12k → 17%BIRTHDAY BLESSINGS: $23k → 19%CHAMP ASSISTANCE DOGS INC: $15k → 11%COYOTE HILL CHRISTIAN CHILDREN'S HOME: $10k → 17%FAITH BRIDGE: $20k → 17%JEFFERSON CITY AREA COMMUNITY SERVICES: $15k → 10%JEFFERSON CITY AREA COMMUNITY SERVICES: $15k → 10%ST LOUIS BEREAVEMENT CENTER FOR YOUNG PEOPLE: $10k → 11%ST JAMES CARING CENTER: $10k → 16%SERVE INC: $20k → 11%MEXICO AREA FAMILY YMCA INC: $30k → 18%MEXICO AREA FAMILY YMCA INC: $11k → 18%CENTRAL MISSOURI FOSTER CARE & ADOPTION ASSOCIATION: $35k → 10%CENTRAL MISSOURI FOSTER CARE & ADOPTION ASSOCIATION: $30k → 10%CENTRAL MISSOURI FOSTER CARE & ADOPTION ASSOCIATION: $20k → 10%ADVOCATING FOR CHILDREN IN CRISIS AND TRANSITIONS: $20k → 10%LOVE INC OF COLUMBIA: $15k → 17%NURSES FOR NEWBORNS: $15k → 11%KINGDOM KONNECTIONS: $17k → 17%CHAMP ASSISTANCE DOGS INC: $20k → 11%CITY OF REFUGE: $15k → 17%COLUMBIA FOSTER AND ADOPTION PROJECT: $15k → 17%UNITED COMMUNITY BUILDERS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $15k → 17%MEXICO AREA FAMILY YMCA INC: $40k → 18%SERVICES BY DESIGN INC: $10k → 11%UNITED COMMUNITY BUILDERS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $10k → 17%UNITED COMMUNITY BUILDERS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $10k → 17%OATS INC: $20k → 17%JOB POINT: $15k → 17%OATS INC: $13k → 17%LOVE INC OF COLUMBIA: $12k → 17%OATS INC: $10k → 17%MEXICO AREA FAMILY YMCA INC: $20k → 18%MEXICO AREA FAMILY YMCA INC: $20k → 18%MEXICO AREA FAMILY YMCA INC: $18k → 18%MEXICO AREA FAMILY YMCA INC: $15k → 18%MEXICO AREA FAMILY YMCA INC: $13k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
MI
IN
OH
PA
CA
NE
MO
VA
KS
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 7% of Allen P and Josephine B Green’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 97% of the giving stays in MO; read by stated purpose it is 90% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Allen P and Josephine B Greenlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 5.2% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$4.1M · 73 repeat orgs$1.4M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +41% since the first grant, against +26% for the ones you funded once.

73 repeat relationships — 24 still active in FY2025, 49 since wound down; 18 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

73
101

Total granted

$4.1M
$1.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+26%

Still filing today

70%
69%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $251k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationHealthYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionEmploymentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MA
    Mexico Area Family YMCA INC
    5× · 2017–2025 · $167k · revenue +82%
  • PA
    PRESSER ARTS CENTER
    4× · 2018–2024 · $105k · revenue +22%
  • CM
    CENTRAL MISSOURI FOSTER CARE & ADOPTION ASSOCIATION
    4× · 2018–2025 · $105k · revenue +856%

Funded once

  • JF
    JOBS FOR AMERICA'S GRADUATES - MISSOURI INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $30k · revenue ×24,731
  • SP
    ST PAUL CHRISTIAN METHODIST EPISCOPAL CHURCH
    one grant, 2020 · $30k
  • JC
    JOHN C DILLON KC CLUB INC AKA MEXICO KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS #3760
    one grant, 2020 · $25k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Family Advocacy and Community Training Inc

Enhance the opportunities and quality of life for children and youth with disabilities. the organization achieves this objective through parent training, emotional support, direct advocacy, community education, self-advocacy and navigation…

—
2
Missouri Accreditation of Programs for Children & Youth

Promotion of child care excellence in missouri

Education
3
St Martin's Child Center

Providing day care services to infants and children of low income families in northern st. louis county, missouri

—
4
Child Safe of Central Missouri Inc

Child safe of central missouri's mission is to respond to and prevent child abuse by providing advocacy, support, and resources to children who are alleged victims of abuse and other traumatic crimes, and to their non-offending family…

Crime & Legal
5
Kids Win Missouri

Kids Win Missouri furthers child well-being by advancing the health, education, safety and development of Missouri children and their families, especially those who are at-risk because of poverty, abuse, neglect, racial inequities or other…

Human Services
6
Children's Home Society of Missouri

The agency's overarching philosophy is based in the neurosequential model of therapeutics (nmt), developed by dr. bruce perry. nmt is a trauma-informed, developmentally sensitive approach to understanding the impact of a child's history on…

Human Services
7
Jackson County Community Children's Services Fund

Children's services fund ('csf') is an innovative way to support child well-being projects. while we are funded by a jackson county sales tax, we are a stand-alone organization led by an independent board. (continued on schedule o)we are…

Human Services
8
Capital City Casa

It is the mission of the capital city casa to advocate for the best interests of abused and neglected children with the 19th judicial circuit of missouri, based on the belief that all children are entitled to a safe and permanent home. the…

Crime & Legal
9
Forward Through Ferguson

Embracing the ferguson commission's mandate, forward through ferguson centers impacted communities and mobilizes accountable bodies to advance racially equitable systems and policies that ensure all people in the st. louis region can…

Civil Rights
10
Casa of South Central Missouri

To provide a voice for the abused and neglected children in the 25th judicial court system. trained and committed volunteers work in conjunction with key agencies and legal representatives of the children to shorten the time from the court…

Human Services
11
Heart of Missouri United Way Inc

The heart of missouri united way works in improve lives of people in need by mobilizing and coordinating the caring power of community resources in mid-missouri.

—
12
Mbch Children and Family Ministries

To provide programs and services for children, youth and families throughout missouri.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Connections to Success and the most unlike its peers is Stonebridge House. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 22. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%4%<5yr12%9%5–10yr16%20%10–20yr15%28%20–35yr15%26%35–55yr23%14%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%2%<5yr12%8%5–10yr16%23%10–20yr15%19%20–35yr15%36%35–55yr23%13%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/154
the rest of the field
13%
2,949/22,236

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

137 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 137 of the 194 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

8
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
43
Early backer (in before they grew)
134/137
Grantees still filing
90/137
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

A P GREEN CHAPEL PRESERVATION FUND — $170,000 · OtherMEXICO 21ST CENTURY FUND INC — $148,000 · OtherST BRENDAN SCHOOL — $134,000 · OtherCURATORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI SPECIAL TR — $112,000 · Other+120 more — $2,647,630 · Other+120 moreMexico Area Family YMCA INC — $166,500 · Human ServicesMexico Area Family …CENTRAL MISSOURI FOSTER CARE & ADOPTION ASSOCIATION — $105,000 · Human ServicesCENTRAL MISSOURI FO…Birthday Blessings — $51,000 · Human ServicesBirthday BlessingsCoyote Hill Foster Care Ministries — $47,000 · Human ServicesJEFFERSON CITY AREA COMMUNITY SERVICES — $45,000 · Human ServicesOATS INC — $43,000 · Human ServicesCHAMP ASSISTANCE DOGS — $35,000 · Human ServicesUNITED COMMUNITY BUILDERS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CO — $35,000 · Human ServicesSHOES FROM THE HEART — $34,000 · Human Services+26 more — $362,000 · Human Services+26 moreHOME WORKS - THVP — $91,500 · EducationMISSOURI MILITARY ACADEMY — $49,000 · EducationNora Stewart Early Learning Center — $33,000 · EducationJOBS FOR AMERICA'S GRADUATES - MISSOURI INC — $30,000 · EducationMISSOURI COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 · EducationCOLUMBIA CHRISTIAN ACADEMY — $20,000 · EducationMEXICO YOUNG FARMERS ASSOCIATION — $20,000 · EducationBenedictine College — $18,750 · EducationCOLUMBIA COLLEGE — $11,250 · Education+5 more — $37,500 · EducationThe Ranken-Jordan Home For Convalescent Crippled Children — $90,000 · HealthMEMORY CARE HOME SOLUTIONS — $85,600 · HealthPARENTS AS TEACHERS NATIONAL CENTER INC — $46,000 · HealthRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF MID MISSOURI INC — $41,500 · HealthINDEPENDENT LIVING CENTER OF MID-MO — $20,000 · HealthHAVENHOUSE ST LOUIS — $14,500 · HealthSAVING KIDSIGHT — $11,400 · Health+3 more — $20,000 · HealthTHE FOOD BANK FOR CENTRAL & NORTHEAST MISSOURI — $240,000 · Food & NutritionNEIGHBORS HELPING NEIGHBORS — $30,000 · Food & NutritionPANTRY FOR ADAIR COUNTY INC — $20,000 · Food & Nutrition+2 more — $8,500 · Food & NutritionVANDALIA RECREATION CORPORATION — $143,000 · Community ImprovementAUDRAIN DEVELOPMENT INC — $80,000 · Community ImprovementPRESSER ARTS CENTER — $105,000 · Arts & CultureSIMMONS STABLE PRESERVATION FUND INC — $56,000 · Arts & CultureVANDALIA AREA HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $7,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more — $5,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$3,211,630Human Services$923,500Education$331,000Health$329,000Food & Nutrition$298,500Community Improvement$223,000Arts & Culture$173,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE FOOD BANK FOR CENTRAL & NORTHEAST MISSOURI — $240,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetMexico Area Family YMCA INC — $166,500 over 5y, 3.0% of budgetVANDALIA RECREATION CORPORATION — $143,000 over 4y, 67% of budgetPRESSER ARTS CENTER — $105,000 over 4y, 10% of budgetCENTRAL MISSOURI FOSTER CARE & ADOPTION ASSOCIATION — $105,000 over 4y, 3.1% of budgetTHE HELP CENTER INC — $101,700 over 4y, 16% of budgetMOBERLY AREA COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $100,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetAudrain County Historical Society — $98,000 over 2y, 47% of budgetHOME WORKS - THVP — $91,500 over 5y, 2.4% of budgetHandi-Shop Inc — $90,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetThe Ranken-Jordan Home For Convalescent Crippled Children — $90,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMEMORY CARE HOME SOLUTIONS — $85,600 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetMEXICO PARKS FOUNDATION INC — $81,000 over 4y, 100% of budgetAUDRAIN DEVELOPMENT INC — $80,000 over 3y, 22% of budgetFriends of Mid Missouri Fisher House Inc — $68,000 over 3y, 8.7% of budgetCentral Missouri Stop Human Trafficking Coalition — $65,000 over 2y, 14% of budgetRETRIEVING FREEDOM INC — $60,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetKINGDOM PROJECTS INC — $56,000 over 3y, 5.5% of budgetSIMMONS STABLE PRESERVATION FUND INC — $56,000 over 3y, 18% of budgetWELCOME HOME INC — $55,000 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetGreater Kansas City Community Foundation — $52,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBirthday Blessings — $51,000 over 2y, 14% of budgetMISSOURI GIRLS TOWN FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetMISSOURI MILITARY ACADEMY — $49,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCoyote Hill Foster Care Ministries — $47,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetPARENTS AS TEACHERS NATIONAL CENTER INC — $46,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetJEFFERSON CITY AREA COMMUNITY SERVICES — $45,000 over 3y, 5.9% of budgetOATS INC — $43,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF MID MISSOURI INC — $41,500 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetHOPECAM INC — $37,000 over 4y, 3.7% of budgetWoodhaven Learning Center d/b/a Woodhaven — $36,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAudrain Humane Society — $35,000 over 2y, 26% of budgetCHAMP ASSISTANCE DOGS — $35,000 over 2y, 4.5% of budgetUNITED COMMUNITY BUILDERS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CO — $35,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetThe Laddonia Mo Athletic Associatio — $35,000 over 2y, 50% of budgetSHOES FROM THE HEART — $34,000 over 5y, 2.8% of budgetNora Stewart Early Learning Center — $33,000 over 3y, 5.0% of budgetNEIGHBORS HELPING NEIGHBORS — $30,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetHALO FOUNDATION — $30,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetLove Columbia Corp Love Columbia — $27,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetJOB POINT — $25,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetBuilding Futures Inc — $23,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetPenuel Inc DBA Camp Penuel — $22,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetMISSOURI COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 over 1y, 6.9% of budgetGATEWAY REGION YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT CU INC — $20,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetCity Garden Grade School — $20,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetHEART OF MISSOURI CASA — $20,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE FOOD BANK FOR CENTRAL & NORTHEAST MISSOURI ↗
  • Who funds Mexico Area Family YMCA INC ↗
  • Who funds VANDALIA RECREATION CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds PRESSER ARTS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL MISSOURI FOSTER CARE & ADOPTION ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds THE HELP CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds MOBERLY AREA COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Audrain County Historical Society ↗
  • Who funds HOME WORKS - THVP ↗
  • Who funds Handi-Shop Inc ↗
  • Who funds The Ranken-Jordan Home For Convalescent Crippled Children ↗
  • Who funds MEMORY CARE HOME SOLUTIONS ↗
  • Who funds MEXICO PARKS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AUDRAIN DEVELOPMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds Friends of Mid Missouri Fisher House Inc ↗
  • Who funds Central Missouri Stop Human Trafficking Coalition ↗
  • Who funds RETRIEVING FREEDOM INC ↗
  • Who funds KINGDOM PROJECTS INC ↗
  • Who funds SIMMONS STABLE PRESERVATION FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds WELCOME HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds Greater Kansas City Community Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Birthday Blessings ↗
  • Who funds MISSOURI GIRLS TOWN FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MISSOURI MILITARY ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds Coyote Hill Foster Care Ministries ↗
  • Who funds PARENTS AS TEACHERS NATIONAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds JEFFERSON CITY AREA COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds OATS INC ↗
  • Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF MID MISSOURI INC ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Veterans United Found…Boone Electric Commun…Commerce Bancshares F…Mfa Oil FoundationOrscheln Industries F…Stafford Family Chari…Griffin Family Founda…St Louis Community Fo…Miriam a Edmonston Ch…Boone County Communit…Employees Community F…Heart of Missouri Uni…
Veterans United FoundationMO95.2× affinity55 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Veterans United Foundation · Boone Electric Community Trust · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · Mfa Oil Foundation · Orscheln Industries Foundation Inc · Stafford Family Charitable Trust · Griffin Family Foundation Inc · St Louis Community Foundation Inc · Miriam a Edmonston Charitable Foundation · Boone County Community Trust · Employees Community Fund of the Boeing Company · Heart of Missouri United Way Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Allen P and Josephine B Green funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    54report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Allen P and Josephine B Green?

    Find your warmest path to Allen P and Josephine B Green through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 194 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines