Skip to content

· Private foundation

Allen Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.8M
Granted FY2025still arriving
43
Grants FY2025still arriving
11
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$2.9MHealth$2.0MEducation$1.8MScience & Tech$849kHuman Services$634kInternational$556kArts & Culture$430kYouth Development$195kOther$0
02FY2025 · 43 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k26 grants · $721k
  • $50k–250k13 grants · $1.0M
$37,500
Median grant
11
States reached
$28M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$200,000
HIDDEN HARVEST$100,000
FOOD RESCUE$100,000
BRIGHAM & WOMENS HOSPITAL$99,718
THE BRIDGE FOOD CENTER$75,000
UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA$62,470
NMC EXTEDED EDUCATION & TRAINING$60,000
GRAND TRAVERSE AREA CHILDREN'S GARDENT$60,000
UNITED WAY OF MIDLAND COUNTY$54,000
NORTHWEST EDUCATION SERVICES$51,074
INTERLOCHEN CENTER FOR THE ARTS$50,000
MICROBINE HLTH RESEARCH INSTITUTE$50,000
STARFISH FAMILY SERVICES INC$50,000
AGAPE COMMUNITY TRANSFORMATION$47,210
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY$43,196
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $369k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 88% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BASIC NEEDS INC OF SOUTH WASHINGTON CO: $17k → 6%MPC RESCUE: $15k → 13%GLADWIN COMMUNITY SERVICES CORP: $23k → 14%STARFISH FAMILY SERVICES INC: $50k → 21%GREATER GREEN BAY YMCA: $2k → 10%SPOON: $20k → 12%INTERFAITH ALLIANCE CORPORATION: $10k → 17%SUSTAINABLE LIBERIA: $30k → 14%VALLEY COMMUNITY CENTER: $2k → 16%LOAVES & FISHES COMMUNITY SERVICES: $2k → 7%THE INGA FOUNDATION: $25k → 13%BEMORE CARING INC: $10k → 6%CRAWFORD CO COMM CHRISTIAN HELP CENTER: $12k → 14%HIDDEN HARVEST: $100k → 18%SUSTAINABLE LIBERIA: $30k → 14%CRAWFORD CO COMM CHRISTIAN HELP CENTER: $7k → 14%BENZIE SENIOR RESOURCES: $8k → 10%BENZIE SENIOR RESOURCES: $8k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
VT
NH
WA
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
MO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
NM
AR
TN
NC
SC
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

60%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.9M · 52 repeat orgs$4.0M to everyone else

52 repeat relationships: 21 still active in FY2025, 31 since wound down; 22 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

52
98

Total granted

$5.9M
$3.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+32%

Still filing today

52%
48%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 57% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $762k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesFood & NutritionEducationInternationalHealthYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Trustees of Tufts College
    2× · 2020–2021 · $211k · revenue +39%
  • WM
    WEST MIDLAND FAMILY CENTER
    3× · 2021–2025 · $110k · revenue +45%
  • AC
    AGAPE COMMUNITY TRANSFORMATION
    3× · 2021–2025 · $106k · revenue +16% · 27% of their budget

Funded once

  • CC
    CRAWFORD CO COMM ON AGING
    one grant, 2021 · $269k
  • AN
    ACTA NON VERBA URBAN YOUTH FARM
    one grant, 2024 · $150k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA
    one grant, 2023 · $128k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Second Harvest Heartland

Second harvest heartland's mission is to end hunger together. in partnership with more than 1,000 food shelves and hunger-relief programs in minnesota and western wisconsin, we provided 145 million meals to neighbors last year.

Food & Nutrition
2
The Food Bank for Larimer County

To provide food to all in need through community partnerships and hunger relief programs. Our vision is a hunger-free Larimer County.

Food & Nutrition
3
Feeding Westchester Inc

Driven by the belief that access to healthy food is a basic right for all people, feeding westchester leads hunger action programs and mobilizes the resources needed to eradicate hunger in westchester county.

—
4
Nashville Food Project Inc

The nashville food project brings people together to grow, cook, and share nourishing food, with the goals of cultivating community and alleviating hunger in our city.

Food & Nutrition
5
Idaho Foodbank Warehouse

To help feed, educate and advocate for Idaho's hungry through collaborative partnerships to develop efficient solutions that strengthen individuals, families, and communities.

Food & Nutrition
6
Gleaners Food Bank of Indiana Inc

Gleaners' mission is to be a leader in the fight against hunger. we do this by joining with others to optimize equitable access to nutritious food for those of us facing hunger and working to overcome the conditions causing food insecurity.

—
7
San Francisco Food Bank

To end hunger in san francisco and marin counties by soliciting food donations nationally, distributing this food to qualifying public service agencies and neighborhood pantries, advocating for improved government food programs, and…

—
8
Harvesters - the Community Food Network

Harvesters mobilizes the power of our community to create equitable access to nutritious food and address the root causes and impact of hunger.

Food & Nutrition
9
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
10
Northern Illinois Food Bank

With the support of our community, we provide over 90 million meals annually through our network of over 900 member food pantries and programs across thirteen counties, currently reaching over a half million individuals each month with…

Food & Nutrition
11
Coralville Community Food Pantry

We believe that food is a human right and that food has the power to bring people together. Our vision is to build a stronger, healthier, and hunger-free Coralville community. Powered by community support, the Coralville Community Food…

Food & Nutrition
12
The Maryland Food Bank Inc

The maryland food bank is a nonprofit hunger-relief organization dedicated to feeding people, strengthening communities, and ending hunger for more marylanders.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rhode Island Community Food Bank Association; the most unlike its peers is Mpc Rescue. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

89 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 89 of the 173 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
18
Early backer (in before they grew)
87/89
Grantees still filing
55/89
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED: $493,753 · OtherMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATEDBOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $400,000 · OtherBOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITALTHE BRIDGE FOOD CENTER: $365,856 · OtherCRAWFORD CO COMM ON AGING: $268,700 · OtherMICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $264,256 · Other+106 more: $5,355,418 · Other+106 moreTrustees of Tufts College: $210,712 · EducationNUYA INC: $105,000 · EducationOregon State University Foundation: $100,000 · EducationWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $70,200 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $59,854 · EducationWestwoods Elementary PTO: $30,000 · EducationLINCOLN MEMORIAL UNIVERSITY: $22,560 · Education+5 more: $66,500 · EducationWEST MIDLAND FAMILY CENTER: $110,000 · Human ServicesHIDDEN HARVEST: $100,000 · Human ServicesSustainable Liberia Inc: $60,000 · Human ServicesSTARFISH FAMILY SERVICES INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesINGA FOUNDATION: $25,000 · Human ServicesGLADWIN COMMUNITY SERVICES CORPORATION: $23,000 · Human ServicesSPOON FOUNDATION: $20,000 · Human ServicesCRAWFORD COUNTY COMMUNITY CHRISTIAN HELP CENTER: $18,700 · Human ServicesBasic Needs Inc of South Washington County: $17,000 · Human Services+7 more: $55,500 · Human ServicesAGAPE COMMUNITY TRANSFORMATION: $106,210 · InternationalGLOBAL VOLUNTEERS: $75,530 · InternationalHEARTH TO HEARTH MINISTRIES INC: $50,643 · InternationalALIMA USA INC: $50,000 · InternationalViviendas Leon: $40,000 · InternationalSEED PROGRAMS INC: $38,870 · InternationalNEPAL YOUTH FOUNDATION: $28,635 · InternationalRISE AGAINST HUNGER INC: $25,000 · InternationalFLYING KITES INC: $19,300 · InternationalMary's Meals USA Inc: $15,000 · InternationalTHE GIVING GROVE: $90,000 · Food & NutritionROSCOMMON COUNTY FOOD PANTRY PROJECT HOPE OF ROSCOMMON COUNT: $74,000 · Food & NutritionPLANT POWERED METRO NEW YORK INC: $50,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD BANK OF CENTRAL & EASTERN NC INC: $50,000 · Food & NutritionHAND2HAND: $30,000 · Food & NutritionPhoenix Community Farm: $30,000 · Food & NutritionFood Bank of Eastern Michigan: $25,000 · Food & NutritionCommon Roots Inc: $20,000 · Food & NutritionSaba Grocers Initiative: $20,000 · Food & NutritionGLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN: $15,000 · Food & Nutrition+5 more: $43,000 · Food & NutritionINTERLOCHEN CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $304,500 · Arts & CultureFlint Cultural Center Corporation: $125,000 · Arts & CultureMYMICHIGAN HEALTH FOUNDATION: $49,425 · HealthEskenazi Health Foundation Inc: $47,583 · HealthTHE HUNTSVILLE HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONINC: $46,000 · HealthGREATER FLINT HEALTH COALITION INC: $36,420 · HealthMORE HEALTH INC: $30,000 · HealthSECOND MILE HAITI: $25,000 · HealthCOMMUNITY CLINIC INC: $10,000 · Health
Other$7,147,983Education$664,826Human Services$479,200International$449,188Food & Nutrition$447,000Arts & Culture$429,500Health$244,428

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetINTERLOCHEN CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $304,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetTrustees of Tufts College: $210,712 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFlint Cultural Center Corporation: $125,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE INTERLOCHEN PUBLIC LIBRARY: $120,000 over 4y, 27% of budgetWEST MIDLAND FAMILY CENTER: $110,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetAGAPE COMMUNITY TRANSFORMATION: $106,210 over 3y, 27% of budgetNUYA INC: $105,000 over 5y, 4.1% of budgetHIDDEN HARVEST: $100,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetOregon State University Foundation: $100,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetACTA NON VERBA YOUTH URBAN FARM PROJECT: $90,000 over 2y, 4.7% of budgetTHE GIVING GROVE: $90,000 over 2y, 5.2% of budgetGLOBAL VOLUNTEERS: $75,530 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetMATHILE INSTITUTE FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF HUMAN NUTRITION: $75,000 over 3y, 6.2% of budgetROSCOMMON COUNTY FOOD PANTRY PROJECT HOPE OF ROSCOMMON COUNT: $74,000 over 4y, 15% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $70,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEagle Village Inc: $61,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSustainable Liberia Inc: $60,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $59,854 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUnited Way of Midland County: $54,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetHEARTH TO HEARTH MINISTRIES INC: $50,643 over 2y, 8.6% of budgetNORTH COUNTY HEALTH PROJECT INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSTARFISH FAMILY SERVICES INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF NORTHERN MICHIGAN INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPLANT POWERED METRO NEW YORK INC: $50,000 over 2y, 6.3% of budgetFOOD BANK OF CENTRAL & EASTERN NC INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALIMA USA INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetMYMICHIGAN HEALTH FOUNDATION: $49,425 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetEskenazi Health Foundation Inc: $47,583 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE HUNTSVILLE HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONINC: $46,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetViviendas Leon: $40,000 over 1y, 26% of budgetSON OF A SAINT: $40,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetGREATER FLINT HEALTH COALITION INC: $36,420 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGRAND TRAVERSE REGIONAL LAND CONSERVANCY: $34,300 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHAND2HAND: $30,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetMORE HEALTH INC: $30,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetWestwoods Elementary PTO: $30,000 over 3y, 24% of budgetNEPAL YOUTH FOUNDATION: $28,635 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetFood Bank of Eastern Michigan: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINGA FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetRISE AGAINST HUNGER INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSECOND MILE HAITI: $25,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetGLADWIN COMMUNITY SERVICES CORPORATION: $23,000 over 1y, 22% of budgetLINCOLN MEMORIAL UNIVERSITY: $22,560 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCommon Roots Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetEast Side Soup Kitchen: $20,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetTERAVANA TRUST F/K/A WELLKIND TRUST: $20,000 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetSPOON FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetYour Store of the Queen City: $20,000 over 1y, 19% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds INTERLOCHEN CENTER FOR THE ARTS ↗
  • Who funds Trustees of Tufts College ↗
  • Who funds Flint Cultural Center Corporation ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE INTERLOCHEN PUBLIC LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds WEST MIDLAND FAMILY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds AGAPE COMMUNITY TRANSFORMATION ↗
  • Who funds NUYA INC ↗
  • Who funds HIDDEN HARVEST ↗
  • Who funds Oregon State University Foundation ↗
  • Who funds ACTA NON VERBA YOUTH URBAN FARM PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds THE GIVING GROVE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Consumers Energy FoundationMI31.9× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Consumers Energy Foundation · Harry a and Margaret D Towsley Foundation · Midland Area Community Foundation · Alden and Vada Dow Fund · Rollin M Gerstacker Foundation · The Herbert H & Grace a Dow Foundation · Grand Traverse Regional Community Foundation · Laura Ludington Hollenbeck Foundation · The Patricia and David Kepler Foundation · The Charles J Strosacker Foundation · Frankenmuth Insurance Foundation · The Carls Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Allen Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Allen Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 13%
  • Community Clinic Inc: 16% of income from government
  • Trustees of Tufts College: 13% of income from government
  • Common Roots Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Oregon State University Foundation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
34report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Allen Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Allen Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 173 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Allen’s filings →

More from the funding graph