Skip to content

· Private foundation

Allen and Shirley Speiser Foundation Inc Stanley Brooks

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$124k
Granted FY2025still arriving
24
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0183% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$418kHealth$232kInternational$122kArts & Culture$60kHuman Services$55kEducation$46kCivil Rights$33kReligion$23kOther$0
02FY2025 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k20 grants · $69k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $55k
$3,090
Median grant
10
States reached
$3.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Grand Foundation$25,000
Stand Up For Cancer$10,000
World Food Bank$10,000
Princess Promise$10,000
Missouri Academy of Music$8,000
Ragtime Film Society Foundation$6,000
Columbia Independant Schools$6,000
Beth Shalom Congregation$5,000
Jamie Raskin Foundation$5,000
Rise Together for Cancer$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Individual grant recipient$3,090
Deaf Can Action Network$3,000
Children's Tumor Foundation (Cupids Organization)$3,000
Friends of Springton Manor$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–22, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Coyote Hill: $1k → 17%World Food Program: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
IN
OH
PA
CT
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
AR
NC
DC
MS
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$617k · 29 repeat orgs$125k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +45% since the first grant, against +25% for those funded once.

29 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
34

Total granted

$617k
$85k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
+25%

Still filing today

45%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 60% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $40k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthReligionPhilanthropyArts & CultureAnimalsEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PP
    Princess Promise Inc
    8× · 2017–2025 · $121k · revenue +53%
  • CI
    COLUMBIA INDEPENDENT SCHOOL INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $37k · revenue +45%
  • WHYY INC
    7× · 2017–2025 · $23k · revenue +20%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $8k
  • CF
    Community Foundation of NC
    one grant, 2024 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Curesearch for Children's Cancer

Curesearch's mission is to fund & support targeted & innovative cancer research with measurable results, & to be the authoritative source of information & resources for all those affected by children's cancer. see schedule o for…

Health
2
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
3
Colorado Children's Campaign

The colorado children's campaign relentlessly champions the needs of children. we leverage data, research, and relationships to unapologetically advocate for kids, fighting for a brighter, more equitable future for every child in colorado.…

—
4
Children's Heartlink

We save children's lives by transforming pediatric heart care in underserved parts of the world.

—
5
Cog Research Foundation Llc

Cog research foundation, llc is a california 501(c)(3) entity founded in 2024 and designed to become the federal grantee organization for the children's oncology group (cog). the cog, a member of the national cancer institute (nci)…

Health
6
The Children's Cancer Cause Inc

The mission of children's cancer cause is to champion policies and programs that improve the lives of children with cancer and survivors.

Health
7
Conquering Congenital Heart Disease

At conquering chd we exist to conquerin the most common birth defect. we engage, listen, learn, and act. we create visibility and empower all impacted by chd. we accomplish this through awareness, knowledge, community and research.

Health
8
Colorado Center On Law and Policy

Colorado center on law and policy is an antipoverty organization advancing the rights of every coloradan.

Crime & Legal
9
Center for Improving Value in Health Care

To equip partners and communities in colorado and across the nation with the resources, services and unbiased data needed to improve health and health care. we help communities, organizations and individuals identify opportunities to…

Health
10
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
11
Cherry Creek Schools Foundation

The cherry creek schools foundation's mission is to enhance the educational experience and whole wellbeing of cherry creek school district students, staff, and families through community support that provides inclusive and innovative…

—
12
Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Colorado Gives Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Fraser Valley Lacrosse Club. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 74 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/29
Grantees still filing
22/29
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Stand Up 4 Cancer: $110,000 · OtherStand Up 4 CancerOSLO FOUNDATION: $50,000 · OtherOSLO FOUNDATIONDeaf Can Action Network: $33,000 · OtherDeaf Can Action NetworkIndividual grant recipient: $26,590 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $21,100 · OtherBeth Shalom Congregation: $20,100 · Other+53 more: $221,123 · Other+53 moreColumbine Community Foundation: $295,206 · PhilanthropyColumbine Community FoundationCOLORADO GIVES FOUNDATION: $101,000 · PhilanthropyCOLORADO GIVES FOUNDATIONTEAM CMMD FOUNDATION: $41,500 · PhilanthropyTEAM CMMD FOUNDATION+1 more: $1,000 · PhilanthropyPrincess Promise Inc: $121,050 · ReligionPrincess Pro…+1 more: $1,000 · ReligionCOLUMBIA INDEPENDENT SCHOOL INC: $37,000 · Education+1 more: $1,000 · EducationWHYY INC: $23,000 · Arts & CultureColumbia Art League: $5,000 · Arts & CultureCHILDREN'S TUMOR FOUNDATION: $18,500 · HealthHOPE SPRINGS EQUESTRIAN THERAPY INC: $2,000 · HealthAmerican Diabetes Association: $750 · Health+1 more: $500 · HealthSANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION: $8,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$481,913Philanthropy$438,706Religion$122,050Education$38,000Arts & Culture$28,000Health$21,750Crime & Legal$8,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetColumbine Community Foundation: $295,206 over 8y, 3.9% of budgetPrincess Promise Inc: $121,050 over 8y, 11% of budgetCOLORADO GIVES FOUNDATION: $101,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTEAM CMMD FOUNDATION: $41,500 over 7y, 13% of budgetCOLUMBIA INDEPENDENT SCHOOL INC: $37,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetWHYY INC: $23,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S TUMOR FOUNDATION: $18,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetALEXS LEMONADE STAND FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION: $8,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMARSH CREEK EAGLES INC POP WARNER LITTLE SCHOLARS: $6,000 over 2y, 4.5% of budgetColumbia Art League: $5,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetTeamChildren: $3,750 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetTROUT UNLIMITED INC: $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLORADO HEADWATERS LAND TRUST: $3,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetCHESTER COUNTY FOOD BANK: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE SPRINGS EQUESTRIAN THERAPY INC: $2,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetCORPORATION FOR SUPPORTIVE HOUSING: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBROADWAY CARESEQUITY FIGHTS AIDS INC: $1,283 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILDRENS FUND OF CHESTER COUNTY: $1,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCoyote Hill Foster Care Ministries: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGIVE A NOTE FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Diabetes Association: $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCity Garden Grade School: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBENEVOLENT HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLUCKY DOG ANIMAL RESCUE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Columbine Community Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Princess Promise Inc ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO GIVES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TEAM CMMD FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COLUMBIA INDEPENDENT SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds WHYY INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S TUMOR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ALEXS LEMONADE STAND FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MARSH CREEK EAGLES INC POP WARNER LITTLE SCHOLARS ↗
  • Who funds Columbia Art League ↗
  • Who funds TeamChildren ↗
  • Who funds TROUT UNLIMITED INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pfizer Foundation IncNY7.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Allen and Shirley Speiser Foundation Inc Stanley Brooks funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Allen and Shirley Speiser Foundation Inc Stanley Brooks. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Sandy Hook Promise Foundation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 74 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Allen and Shirley Speiser Foundation Inc Stanley Brooks’ filings →

More from the funding graph