Skip to content
Allan Louis Loeb Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Allan Louis Loeb Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$49k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Animals$297kHealth$40kEnvironment$32kEducation$24kRecreation & Sports$7k
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$4,455
Median grant
1
States reached
$797k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HIGH HOPES THERAPUETIC RIDING$4,500
A PLACE CALLED HOPE$4,500
ANIMAL HAVEN$4,500
DAN COSGROVE ANIMAL SHELTER$4,500
GREATER NEW HAVEN CAT PROJECT$4,500
BRANFORD COMPASSION CLUB$4,500
TAIL TO PAW ANIMAL SUPPORT$4,455
ALL THE KINGS HORSES EQUINE RESCUE$4,000
EC SCRANTON MEMORIAL LIBRARY$3,500
HOPE ALLIANCE$3,000
WHERE THE LOVE IS ANIMAL RESCUE$3,000
BLACKSTONE MEMORIAL LIBRARY$2,000
LIKE A FEATHER WILDLIFE REHAB$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

None of its grants could be placed against low income need for this view.

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$371k · 20 repeat orgs$28k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
11

Total granted

$371k
$28k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+56%
+68%

Still filing today

55%
27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsEducationEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HIGH HOPES THERAPEUTIC RIDING INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $40k · revenue +7%
  • BC
    BRANFORD COMPASSION CLUB INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $34k · revenue +373%
  • GN
    GREATER NEW HAVEN CAT PROJECT INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $29k · revenue +271%

Funded once

  • NH
    NEW HAVEN ANIMAL SHELTERHUMANE COM
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • GP
    GUILFORD PUBLIC LIBRARY
    one grant, 2023 · $4k
  • FF
    FURRY FRIENDS FOSTER AND RESCUE INC
    one grant, 2018 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Connecticut Cat Connection Inc

Dedicated to the welfare of animals with a no-kill policy (with medical exceptions). Our efforts are focused primarily on finding loving homes for the many cats that are strays, abused, abandoned, surrendered or impounded.

Animals
2
Milford Humane Society Inc

Find homes to adopt more than 200 cats per year and rehabilitation of stray and feral cats

Animals
3
Hope Fur Paws Rescue

To help injured, abandoned and unwanted animals. We provide food, vet care that includes heartworm prevention and spay or neuter services, shelter and anything else needed.

Animals
4
Chester Friends of the Animals Inc

Caring for homeless pets

—
5
Rose Hope Animal Rescue and Refuge

Care and treatment of cats and animals

Animals
6
All About the Cats Rescue Inc

Rescue, save and possibly re-home animals in need.

Animals
7
Companion Animal Rescue & Ed Inc

Rescue & care for animals

Animals
8
Stray Haven Rescue Inc

Give medical shelter and foster cats.

Animals
9
Finding Shelter Inc

Volunteer supported animal rescue organization

Animals
10
Team Animal Rescue Inc

animal rescue and care

Animals
11
Houlton Humane Society

To prevent cruelty and encourage and educate humane treatment of animals.

Animals
12
Meriden Humane Society Inc

Animal care and treatment - the humane society takes in unwanted cats and dogs, provides shelter food and medical attention . the objective is animal placement in permanent loving homes.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Horse of Connecticut Inc; the most unlike its peers is Ec Scranton Memorial Library. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
10/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LIKE A FEATHER WILDLIFE REHAB: $40,500 · OtherLIKE A FEATHER WILDLIFE REHABHIGH HOPES THERAPEUTIC RIDING INC: $40,000 · OtherHIGH HOPES THERAPEUTIC RIDING INCTOWN OF BRANFORD: $24,500 · OtherTOWN OF BRANFORDEC SCRANTON MEMORIAL LIBRARY: $18,500 · OtherEC SCRANTON MEMORIAL LIBRARYTAIL TO PAW ANIMAL SUPPORT: $15,155 · OtherTAIL TO PAW ANIMAL SUPPORTBLACKSTONE MEMORIAL LIBRARY: $13,500 · OtherBLACKSTONE MEMORIAL LIBRARYHOPE ALLIANCE: $13,000 · OtherHOPE ALLIANCETHE GUILFORD FREE LIBRARY: $10,500 · OtherWHERE THE LOVE IS ANIMAL RESCUE: $8,000 · Other+10 more: $32,300 · Other+10 moreA PLACE CALLED HOPE INC: $36,500 · AnimalsA PLACE CALLED HOPE INCGREATER NEW HAVEN CAT PROJECT INC: $29,000 · AnimalsGREATER NEW HAVEN CAT PROJECT INCHORSE of Connecticut Inc: $25,500 · AnimalsHORSE of Connecticut IncFERALCARE INC: $17,000 · AnimalsFERALCARE INCMitchell Farm Equine Retirement Inc: $10,500 · AnimalsMitchell Farm Equine Retirement IncALL THE KINGS HORSES EQUINE RESCUE INC: $10,000 · AnimalsALL THE KINGS HORSES EQUINE RESCUE INCTHE ANIMAL HAVEN INC: $8,500 · AnimalsTHE ANIMAL HAVEN INC+3 more: $7,000 · AnimalsBRANFORD COMPASSION CLUB INC: $34,000 · EducationBRANFORD …FRIENDS OF HAMMONASSET INC: $5,000 · Environment
Other$215,955Animals$144,000Education$34,000Environment$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHIGH HOPES THERAPEUTIC RIDING INC: $40,000 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetA PLACE CALLED HOPE INC: $36,500 over 7y, 3.1% of budgetBRANFORD COMPASSION CLUB INC: $34,000 over 7y, 3.7% of budgetGREATER NEW HAVEN CAT PROJECT INC: $29,000 over 7y, 3.7% of budgetHORSE of Connecticut Inc: $25,500 over 6y, 3.0% of budgetEC SCRANTON MEMORIAL LIBRARY: $18,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetFERALCARE INC: $17,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetMitchell Farm Equine Retirement Inc: $10,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetALL THE KINGS HORSES EQUINE RESCUE INC: $10,000 over 3y, 4.6% of budgetTHE ANIMAL HAVEN INC: $8,500 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetFRIENDS OF HAMMONASSET INC: $5,000 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetCONNECTICUT HUMANE SOCIETY: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HIGH HOPES THERAPEUTIC RIDING INC ↗
  • Who funds A PLACE CALLED HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds BRANFORD COMPASSION CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER NEW HAVEN CAT PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds HORSE of Connecticut Inc ↗
  • Who funds EC SCRANTON MEMORIAL LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds FERALCARE INC ↗
  • Who funds Mitchell Farm Equine Retirement Inc ↗
  • Who funds ALL THE KINGS HORSES EQUINE RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ANIMAL HAVEN INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF HAMMONASSET INC ↗
  • Who funds FURRY FRIENDS FOSTER AND RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds CONNECTICUT HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds US Horse Welfare and Rescue Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Aetna Foundation IncThe Pfizer Foundation…The John T and Jane a…The Community Foundat…Paypal Charitable Giv…American Online Givin…The Bank of America C…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Aetna Foundation IncCT16.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Aetna Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The John T and Jane a Wiederhold Foundation · The Community Foundation for Greater New Haven · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Allan Louis Loeb Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Allan Louis Loeb Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 110%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • High Hopes Therapeutic Riding Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
11get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Allan Louis Loeb Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Allan Louis Loeb Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Allan Louis Loeb’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home