Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Allan & Muriel Greenblatt Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$307k
Granted FY2025still arriving
23
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$175k
Largest
01What you fund
0193% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Health$1.0MReligion$247kArts & Culture$240kEducation$197kPhilanthropy$119kHuman Services$54kInternational$45kMembership Benefit$13kOther$0
02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k17 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $111k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $175k
$1,500
Median grant
5
States reached
$442k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BRIGHAM AND WOMENS HOSPITAL$175,000
UNIVERSITY OF PA$35,000
PALM BEACH OPERA$27,000
TEMPLE EMANUEL$25,000
TEMPLE EMANUEL PALM BEACH$14,035
TEMPLE BETH ISRAEL GREAT NECK$10,050
UJA FEDERATION OF NY$3,600
NORTHWELL HEALTH$3,050
JEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM BEACH$2,800
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$2,000
TOWN PALM BEACH UNITED WAY$1,500
MET MUSEUM OF ART$1,500
PLAY FOR PINK$1,150
KATZ WOMENS HOSPITAL$1,000
HILLEL OF BROWARD AND PB$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $33k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 61% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%JOIN ISRAEL: $5k → 6%JOIN ISRAEL: $5k → 6%JOIN ISRAEL: $5k → 17%JOIN ISRAEL: $5k → 17%SIBS PLACE: $1k → 6%SIBS PLACE: $300 → 6%SID JACOBSON JCC: $1k → 6%MORSE LIFE FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
NY
MA
WY
PA
CT
CA
MD
TN
DC
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.7M · 38 repeat orgs$199k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +19% since the first grant, against +8% for the ones you funded once.

38 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2025, 22 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

38
51

Total granted

$1.7M
$195k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+8%

Still filing today

39%
18%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureInternationalPhilanthropyEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PB
    PALM BEACH OPERA INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $218k · revenue +69%
  • QC
    QUEENS COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $40k · revenue +90%
  • BI
    BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION
    4× · 2020–2024 · $24k · revenue +19%

Funded once

  • JT
    JEWISH THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY OF AMERICA
    one grant, 2020 · $40k
  • TI
    TEMPLE ISRAEL OF GREAT NECK
    one grant, 2021 · $34k
  • MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue +8%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Long Island Jewish Medical Center

Long island jewish medical center is part of the northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and…

Health
2
Northwell Health Foundation

Northwell health foundation inc. is dedicated toward helping donors, patients, and leaders link their vision and philanthropic support toward helping the underserved and uninsured, advancing the latest frontiers in medical technology and…

Health
3
Lenox Hill Hospital

Lenox hill hospital is part of northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and future generations…

Health
4
North Shore University Hospital

North shore university hospital is part of northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and future…

Health
5
Hadassah the Women's Zionist Org of America Inc

Hadassah, the women's zionist organization of america, inc., a new york not-for-profit corporation ("hwzoa") enhances the health and lives of people in israel, the united states and worldwide through education, advocacy, women's…

Community Improvement
6
National Jewish Health

National Jewish Health's mission since 1899 is to heal, discover and educate as a preeminent healthcare institution. We serve by providing the best integrated and innovative care for patients and their families; by understanding and…

Health
7
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

8
South Shore University Hospital

South shore university hospital is part of northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and future…

Health
9
Weizmann Institute of Science

The weizmann institute of science, located in rehovot, israel, is one of the worlds top-ranking, multidisciplinary research institutions. at any one time, several thousand scientists, staff and students are involved in hundreds of research…

Science & Tech
10
Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.

Education
11
Staten Island University Hospital

Staten island university hospital is an affiliate within northwell health, inc. ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the…

Health
12
Samuel Waxman Cancer Research Foundation

The samuel waxman cancer research foundation (the "foundation") funds innovative research to bring faster cures to patients. in addition to supporting ongoing collaborative research in specific cancers, our scientists are investigating the…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Federation of Palm Beach County Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Morse Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 56 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%0%<5yr14%6%5–10yr21%3%10–20yr20%18%20–35yr12%24%35–55yr12%50%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr21%61%10–20yr20%5%20–35yr12%4%35–55yr12%30%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/35
the rest of the field
12%
5,119/44,097

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 97 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/29
Grantees still filing
18/29
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED — $925,000 · OtherMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATEDUNIVERSITY OF PA — $135,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF PATEMPLE EMANUEL PALM BEACH — $52,485 · Other+72 more — $418,016 · Other+72 morePALM BEACH OPERA INC — $218,000 · Arts & CulturePALM BEACH O…+2 more — $1,240 · Arts & CultureJEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC — $81,900 · PhilanthropyTHE MORSE FOUNDATION — $10,000 · PhilanthropyTown of Palm Beach United Way Inc — $6,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC — $4,200 · PhilanthropyJOIN ISRAEL INC — $20,180 · Human ServicesMORSELIFE FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesSIBS PLACE INC — $1,300 · Human ServicesSID JACOBSON JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER — $1,180 · Human ServicesMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC — $20,000 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER ASSOCIATION INC — $5,000 · HealthCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC — $2,500 · HealthBoca Raton Regional Hospital Inc — $2,000 · Health+2 more — $900 · HealthBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION — $24,000 · International+3 more — $1,132 · InternationalNORTHWELL HEALTH INC — $17,650 · Community Improvement
Other$1,530,501Arts & Culture$219,240Philanthropy$102,100Human Services$32,660Health$30,400International$25,132Community Improvement$17,650

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPALM BEACH OPERA INC — $218,000 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC — $81,900 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetQUEENS COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $40,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION — $24,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJOIN ISRAEL INC — $20,180 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ACTORS' FUND OF AMERICA — $12,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMORSELIFE FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MORSE FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 2y, 17% of budgetTown of Palm Beach United Way Inc — $6,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC — $4,200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHILLEL OF BROWARD AND PALM BEACH INC — $2,800 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPLAY FOR PINK INC — $2,400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBoca Raton Regional Hospital Inc — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNew York University — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSIBS PLACE INC — $1,300 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSID JACOBSON JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER — $1,180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICA-ISRAEL CULTURAL FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFLORIDA SHERIFFS ASSOCIATION INC — $600 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHIAS INC — $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC — $432 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTH FLORIDA PBS INC — $240 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PALM BEACH OPERA INC
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC
  • Who funds QUEENS COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds JOIN ISRAEL INC
  • Who funds MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds THE ACTORS' FUND OF AMERICA
  • Who funds MORSELIFE FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds THE MORSE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Town of Palm Beach United Way Inc
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC
  • Who funds HILLEL OF BROWARD AND PALM BEACH INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift FundNY12.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Jewish Communal Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Allan & Muriel Greenblatt Charitable Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 60%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 7%
  • Hias Inc88% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc7% of income from government
  • Florida Sheriffs Association Inc4% of income from government
  • South Florida Pbs Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Allan & Muriel Greenblatt Charitable Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Allan & Muriel Greenblatt Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 97 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph