· Private foundation
Allan and Ann Mactier Charitable Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 68% of ALLAN AND ANN MACTIER CHARITABLE FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k35 grants · $194k
- $10k–50k17 grants · $232k
- $250k+1 grant · $260k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PHOENIX ACADEMY | $260,000 |
| OPERA OMAHA INC | $30,000 |
| OMAHA SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION | $25,000 |
| KANEKO | $20,000 |
| WILLA CATHER FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
| NEBRASKA PUBLIC MEDIA FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $15,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $12,000 |
| CHI HEALTH FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| ALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION NEBRASKA CHAPTER | $10,000 |
| GUANCASTE DRY FOREST CONSERVATIVE | $10,000 |
| JDRF INTERNATIONAL | $10,000 |
| OMAHA EQUESTRIAN FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| FRIENDS OF IOWA PBS | $10,000 |
| OMAHA COMMUNITY PLAYHOUSE FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 97% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
56 repeat relationships — 48 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $41k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- OOOPERA OMAHA INC7× · 2018–2024 · $145k · revenue +19%
- TWTHE WILLA CATHER FOUNDATION7× · 2018–2024 · $75k · revenue +50%
- NFNET FOUNDATION FOR TELEVISION4× · 2020–2023 · $42k · revenue +33%
Funded once
- OSOMAHA SPORTS COMMISSIONgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $8k · revenue +306%
- SFSOCIETY FOR THE PRESERVATION OF AMERICAN (SPACDE)one grant, 2022 · $6k
- NCNORTHEAST COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATIONone grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +21%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of the omaha parks foundation is to improve, promote, preserve, protect, and support omaha's parks and recreation system. we engage in initiatives that make our parks system more accessible, inclusive, and beneficial to all…
The nebraska community foundation unleashes abundant local assets, inspires charitable giving, and connects ambitious people to build stronger communities and a greater nebraska.
The university of nebraska foundation grows relationships and resources that enable the university of nebraska to change lives and save lives.
The museum of nebraska art (mona) celebrates the history of nebraska's visual art for diverse audiences. mona collects, preserves, researches, exhibits, and interprets the work of artists who were born, lived, trained, or worked in…
To inspire young people and their families to discover the magic of theater, find their voices, and enrich their communities. theater is utilized as a tool in the educational and social development of young people to provide formal…
Our mission is to help nonprofits fulfill theirs.
The mission of oedc is to implement economic development projects, housing, and community revitalization programs that create jobs, business ownership opportunities and other economic benefits for area residents.
The nmu foundation will establish and foster relationships to generate resources that benefit the strategic goals of northern michigan university.
We transform lives through organ and tissue donation.
Founded in 1984, the omaha zoo foundation supports the mission, research and programs benefitting omaha's henry doorly zoo and aquarium. to ensure a growing, vibrant zoo for future generations, it is our priority to build a solid…
To foster the protection of agricultural, historical and natural resources on land in nebraska through education, partnering and permanent conservation.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Omaha Community Playhouse Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Irvington Volunteer Fire Department. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 21. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
39 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 39 of the 69 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds OPERA OMAHA INC ↗
- Who funds OMAHA SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds Omaha Community Foundation ↗
- Who funds THE WILLA CATHER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds OMAHA EQUESTRIAN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds KANEKO ↗
- Who funds NET FOUNDATION FOR TELEVISION ↗
- Who funds OMAHA ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds OMAHA COMMUNITY PLAYHOUSE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗
- Who funds OMAHA PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds STONY BROOK FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds VOICE ADVOCACY CENTER ↗
- Who funds NORTH HILLS HUNT INC ↗
- Who funds Omaha Children's Museum ↗
- Who funds GUANACASTE DRY FOREST CONSERVATION FUND ↗
- Who funds CHI HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BROWNELL-TALBOT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SIENA FRANCIS HOUSE ↗
- Who funds IRVINGTON VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT ↗
- Who funds Omaha Botanical Center Inc ↗
- Who funds NEBRASKA HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds Catz Angels Care Inc ↗
- Who funds POLISH HERITAGE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds NEBRASKA SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Sherwood Foundation · Robert B Daugherty Foundation · Peter Kiewit Foundation · The Lozier Foundation · The Holland Foundation · Nebraska Community Foundation · The Fred and Eve Simon Charitable Foundation · Suzanne & Walter Scott Foundation · Annette and Paul Smith Charitable Fund · Jewish Federation of Omaha Foundation · The Hawks Foundation · The Charles and Mary Heider Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Allan and Ann Mactier Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Allan and Ann Mactier Charitable Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Allan and Ann Mactier Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.