· Private foundation
Allan and Ann Mactier Charitable Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k35 grants · $194k
- $10k–50k17 grants · $232k
- $250k+1 grant · $260k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PHOENIX ACADEMY | $260,000 |
| OPERA OMAHA INC | $30,000 |
| OMAHA SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION | $25,000 |
| KANEKO | $20,000 |
| NEBRASKA PUBLIC MEDIA FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
| WILLA CATHER FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $15,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $12,000 |
| SIENNA FRANCIS HOUSE | $10,000 |
| JDRF INTERNATIONAL | $10,000 |
| OMAHA ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY | $10,000 |
| OMAHA EQUESTRIAN FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| FRIENDS OF IOWA PBS | $10,000 |
| ETHEL WALKER CHARITABLE | $10,000 |
| OMAHA COMMUNITY PLAYHOUSE FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 97% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
Which US states its grants reach
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
56 repeat relationships: 48 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $41k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- OOOPERA OMAHA INC7× · 2018–2024 · $145k · revenue +19%
- NFNET FOUNDATION FOR TELEVISION4× · 2020–2023 · $42k · revenue +33%
- OZOMAHA ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY4× · 2020–2024 · $40k · revenue +5%
Funded once
- OSOMAHA SPORTS COMMISSIONgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $8k · revenue +306%
- SFSOCIETY FOR THE PRESERVATION OF AMERICAN (SPACDE)one grant, 2022 · $6k
- NCNORTHEAST COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATIONone grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +21%
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of the omaha parks foundation is to improve, promote, preserve, protect, and support omaha's parks and recreation system. we engage in initiatives that make our parks system more accessible, inclusive, and beneficial to all…
The nebraska community foundation unleashes abundant local assets, inspires charitable giving, and connects ambitious people to build stronger communities and a greater nebraska.
The university of nebraska foundation grows relationships and resources that enable the university of nebraska to change lives and save lives.
The museum of nebraska art (mona) celebrates the history of nebraska's visual art for diverse audiences. mona collects, preserves, researches, exhibits, and interprets the work of artists who were born, lived, trained, or worked in…
To inspire young people and their families to discover the magic of theater, find their voices, and enrich their communities. theater is utilized as a tool in the educational and social development of young people to provide formal…
Our mission is to help nonprofits fulfill theirs.
The mission of oedc is to implement economic development projects, housing, and community revitalization programs that create jobs, business ownership opportunities and other economic benefits for area residents.
The nmu foundation will establish and foster relationships to generate resources that benefit the strategic goals of northern michigan university.
We transform lives through organ and tissue donation.
Founded in 1984, the omaha zoo foundation supports the mission, research and programs benefitting omaha's henry doorly zoo and aquarium. to ensure a growing, vibrant zoo for future generations, it is our priority to build a solid…
To foster the protection of agricultural, historical and natural resources on land in nebraska through education, partnering and permanent conservation.
How this is measured
39 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 39 of the 69 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds OPERA OMAHA INC ↗
- Who funds OMAHA SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds Omaha Community Foundation ↗
- Who funds OMAHA EQUESTRIAN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE WILLA CATHER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds KANEKO ↗
- Who funds NET FOUNDATION FOR TELEVISION ↗
- Who funds OMAHA ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗
- Who funds OMAHA COMMUNITY PLAYHOUSE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds OMAHA PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds STONY BROOK FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds VOICE ADVOCACY CENTER ↗
- Who funds NORTH HILLS HUNT INC ↗
- Who funds Omaha Children's Museum ↗
- Who funds CHI HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GUANACASTE DRY FOREST CONSERVATION FUND ↗
- Who funds BROWNELL-TALBOT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SIENA FRANCIS HOUSE ↗
- Who funds IRVINGTON VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT ↗
- Who funds Omaha Botanical Center Inc ↗
- Who funds NEBRASKA HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds Catz Angels Care Inc ↗
- Who funds POLISH HERITAGE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds NEBRASKA SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL INC ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Sherwood Foundation · Robert B Daugherty Foundation · Peter Kiewit Foundation · The Lozier Foundation · The Holland Foundation · Nebraska Community Foundation · The Fred and Eve Simon Charitable Foundation · Suzanne & Walter Scott Foundation · Annette and Paul Smith Charitable Fund · Jewish Federation of Omaha Foundation · The Hawks Foundation · The Charles and Mary Heider Family Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Allan and Ann Mactier Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Allan and Ann Mactier Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Allan and Ann Mactier Charitable Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Allan and Ann Mactier Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on Allan and Ann Mactier’s filings →