Skip to content

· Public charity

All My Children Daycare & Nursery School

The organization operates a day care center and nursery school with various programs to help children grow emotionally and physically.

$513k
Granted FY2025still arriving
23
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$70k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$1.9MHuman Services$1.8MEducation$62kCrime & Legal$10kYouth Development$7kOther$0
02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 23 grants below total $450,102, the rows itemized in this filing. The $512,840 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $62,738 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $37k
  • $10k–50k17 grants · $343k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $70k
$16,164
Median grant
4
States reached
$27M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Bnos Hamelech Lubavitch Girls$70,000
Chabad Of Flushing$40,500
Congregation Bais Tzvi Yosef$38,000
Cheder Menachem Inc$26,000
Kneset Mordechai$23,900
Ohel Sarah Daycare Center$22,000
Kehilat Sephardim Of Ahavat$21,500
PARATZTA$21,213
Israeli Center New Jersey INC$19,000
MERKAZ HAGEULA INC$18,000
CHABED TULUM MEXICO INC$16,500
Chabad Gan Yavneh$16,164
HEICHAL MENACHEM OF KINGSTON$16,000
Individual grant recipient$15,565
HEBREW ACADEMY RASG$15,400
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 97% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Bnos Hamelech Lubavitch Girls: $105k → 15%SHUVA ISRAEL AD HASHEM ELOKECHA: $55k → 14%CHABAD OF FLUSHING: $42k → 13%Chabad Gan Yavneh: $16k → 7%Israeli Center New Jersey INC: $27k → 10%Bnos Hamelech Lubavitch Girls: $70k → 15%SHUVA ISRAEL AD HASHEM ELOKECHA: $52k → 14%Chabad Of Flushing: $41k → 13%OHEL SARA DAY CARE: $75k → 20%Israeli Center New Jersey INC: $19k → 10%Congregation Bais Tzvi Yosef: $38k → 15%SHUVA ISRAEL AD HASHEM ELOKECHA: $27k → 14%KEHILAT SEPHARDIM: $39k → 13%OHEL SARA DAY CARE: $75k → 20%Congregation Bais Tzvi Yosef: $20k → 15%CHABAD OF FLUSHING: $35k → 13%Ohel Sarah Daycare Center: $50k → 20%HEICHAL MENACHEM OF KINGSTON: $16k → 15%CHABAD OF FLUSHING: $35k → 13%OHOLEI YOSEF YITZCHOK LUBAVITCH: $39k → 20%CHABAD OF FLUSHING: $33k → 13%Ohel Sarah Daycare Center: $22k → 20%Cheder Menachem Inc: $67k → 15%Chabad Of Flushing: $30k → 13%PARATZTA: $21k → 20%Cheder Menachem Inc: $26k → 15%KEHILAT SEPHARDIM: $28k → 13%UNITED TALMIDEI HAKVUTZEH: $18k → 20%CHABAD OF FLUSHING: $28k → 13%CHABAD HOSPITALITY CENTER ESHEL: $18k → 20%CHABAD OF FLUSHING: $25k → 13%CHABAD HOSPITALITY CENTER ESHEL: $17k → 20%KEHILAT SEPHARDIM: $24k → 13%CHABED TULUM MEXICO INC: $17k → 20%Kehilat Sephardim Of Ahavat: $22k → 13%MI KAMCHA YISROEL: $21k → 13%MI KAMCHA YISROEL: $20k → 13%CHABAD OF FLUSHING: $19k → 13%MI KAMCHA YISROEL: $17k → 13%ALL MY CHILDREN LEARNING CENTER: $1.4M → 13%MERKAZ HAGEULA: $27k → 20%ALL MY CHILDREN LEARNING CENTER: $140k → 13%MERKAZ HAGEULA INC: $18k → 20%ALL MY CHILDREN LEARNING CENTER: $25k → 13%MERKAZ HAGEULA: $17k → 20%Kneset Mordechai: $24k → 20%CONG TORAH TEMIMA: $42k → 20%LMAAN ACHAI BUCHARIM: $33k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.4M · 28 repeat orgs$364k to everyone else

28 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
19

Total granted

$3.4M
$236k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
0%

Still filing today

36%
11%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $128k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionEducationInternationalCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AM
    ALL MY CHILDREN LEARNING CENTER INC
    3× · 2017–2020 · $1.6M · revenue -40% · 85% of their budget
  • CO
    CHABAD OF FLUSHING INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $286k
  • OS
    OHEL SARAH DAY CARE CENTER INC
    4× · 2018–2025 · $222k

Funded once

  • YC
    YESHIVAS CHANOCH LENAAR
    one grant, 2021 · $45k
  • LA
    LMAN ACHAI BUKHORIM
    one grant, 2017 · $33k
  • UT
    UNITED TALMIDEI HAKVUTZEH
    one grant, 2019 · $18k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tomchei Torah Inc

Religious Teaching

—
2
Ohr Yisrael Yeshiva Inc

Ohr Yisrael is a religious institution that provides religious services and instruction to Rabbis and community members.

Religion
3
Chabad Lametayel Inc

encourage and facilitate the observance of traditional orthodox Jewish practices around the world.

—
4
Minyan Oneg Shabbat

Religious and educational services

Religion
5
Chabad Lubavitch Tulum Mexico Inc

Jewish ministry and outreach to uninformed and wandering Jews in NY, Central America and elsewhere, including religious articles, education, worship, spiritual events, kosher food and other support.

Religion
6
Kehilla Kedosha Inc

TO FOCUS ON JEWISH EDUCATION AND SPIRITUALITY AND to engage with the Almighty by means of passionate prayer, to delve into the inner dimensions of the Torah, and to grow in ones relationship with Hashem.

Religion
7
Chasdei Dovid Elimelech Inc
Philanthropy
8
Kollel Ohr Shmuel Inc

To learn, spread, and study torah

Religion
9
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
10
Chabad Youth Queens Inc

This organization is formed for the charitable religious purpose of providing Jewish ministry, religious education, aid and support of all kinds to families, youth and persons of all ages in the Jewish community of the New York City area…

Religion
11
Ohr Olam Corp

publish religious books

Religion
12
Chabad Jewish Center of Stamford Inc

servicing the stamford Jewish community with religious and education programs

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Oholei Yosef Yitzchok Lubavitch Inc; the most unlike its peers is Meir Isa Bracha Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 55 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/16
Grantees still filing
5/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ALL MY CHILDREN LEARNING CENTER INC: $1,553,656 · OtherALL MY CHILDREN LEARNING CENTER INCOHEL SARAH DAY CARE CENTER INC: $221,500 · OtherOHEL SARAH DAY CARE CENTER INCBNOS HMELECH LUBAVITCH GIRLS OF KINGSTON INC: $174,500 · OtherBNOS HMELECH LUBAVITCH GIRLS OF KINGSTON INCSHUVA ISRAEL AD HASHEM ELOKECHA: $133,600 · OtherKEHILAT SEPHARDIM OF AHAVAT ACHIM: $126,600 · Other+35 more: $833,462 · Other+35 moreCHABAD OF FLUSHING INC: $286,025 · ReligionCHABAD OF FLUS…MI KAMCHA YISROEL INC: $84,444 · ReligionMI KAMCHA YISR…Israeli Center New Jersey Inc: $46,000 · ReligionIsraeli Center…KNESET MORDECHAI: $29,670 · ReligionKNESET MORDECH…United Talmidei Hakvutze Inc: $17,580 · Religion+4 more: $38,460 · Religion+4 moreCheder Menachem INC: $93,000 · EducationOholei Yosef Yitzchok Lubavitch Inc: $54,930 · EducationGAN CHABAD: $31,328 · EducationChabad Lubavitch Hospitality Center Eshel Hachnosas Orchim: $46,300 · InternationalUFARATZTA FUND: $21,213 · InternationalBAIS MENACHEM YOUTH DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM: $16,500 · Crime & Legal
Other$3,043,318Religion$502,179Education$179,258International$67,513Crime & Legal$16,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetALL MY CHILDREN LEARNING CENTER INC: $1,553,656 over 3y, 85% of budgetCHABAD OF FLUSHING INC: $286,025 over 9y, 4.6% of budgetCheder Menachem INC: $93,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetMI KAMCHA YISROEL INC: $84,444 over 6y, 24% of budgetOholei Yosef Yitzchok Lubavitch Inc: $54,930 over 3y, 8.5% of budgetChabad Lubavitch Hospitality Center Eshel Hachnosas Orchim: $46,300 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetIsraeli Center New Jersey Inc: $46,000 over 2y, 7.2% of budgetGAN CHABAD: $31,328 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetKNESET MORDECHAI: $29,670 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetUnited Talmidei Hakvutze Inc: $17,580 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetBAIS MENACHEM YOUTH DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM: $16,500 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetMEIR ISA BRACHA INC: $8,500 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetCHAZAQ ORGANIZATION USA INC: $8,300 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ALL MY CHILDREN LEARNING CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CHABAD OF FLUSHING INC ↗
  • Who funds Cheder Menachem INC ↗
  • Who funds MI KAMCHA YISROEL INC ↗
  • Who funds Oholei Yosef Yitzchok Lubavitch Inc ↗
  • Who funds Chabad Lubavitch Hospitality Center Eshel Hachnosas Orchim ↗
  • Who funds Israeli Center New Jersey Inc ↗
  • Who funds GAN CHABAD ↗
  • Who funds KNESET MORDECHAI ↗
  • Who funds UFARATZTA FUND ↗
  • Who funds United Talmidei Hakvutze Inc ↗
  • Who funds CHABAD TULUM MEXICO INC ↗
  • Who funds BAIS MENACHEM YOUTH DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundNY19.3× affinity11 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Jewish Communal Fund · David Rachamin Foundation · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization All My Children Daycare & Nursery School funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from All My Children Daycare & Nursery School. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 20%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to All My Children Daycare & Nursery School?

    Find your warmest path to All My Children Daycare & Nursery School through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 55 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on All My Children Daycare & Nursery School’s filings →

    More from the funding graph