· Public charity
All My Children Daycare & Nursery School
The organization operates a day care center and nursery school with various programs to help children grow emotionally and physically.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 80% of ALL MY CHILDREN DAYCARE & NURSERY SCHOOL’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 23 grants below total $450,102 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $512,840 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $62,738 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k5 grants · $37k
- $10k–50k17 grants · $343k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $70k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Bnos Hamelech Lubavitch Girls | $70,000 |
| Chabad Of Flushing | $40,500 |
| Congregation Bais Tzvi Yosef | $38,000 |
| Cheder Menachem Inc | $26,000 |
| Kneset Mordechai | $23,900 |
| Ohel Sarah Daycare Center | $22,000 |
| Kehilat Sephardim Of Ahavat | $21,500 |
| PARATZTA | $21,213 |
| Israeli Center New Jersey INC | $19,000 |
| MERKAZ HAGEULA INC | $18,000 |
| CHABED TULUM MEXICO INC | $16,500 |
| Chabad Gan Yavneh | $16,164 |
| HEICHAL MENACHEM OF KINGSTON | $16,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $15,565 |
| HEBREW ACADEMY RASG | $15,400 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 97% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
28 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $128k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- AMALL MY CHILDREN LEARNING CENTER INC3× · 2017–2020 · $1.6M · revenue -40% · 85% of their budget
- COCHABAD OF FLUSHING INC9× · 2017–2025 · $286k
- OSOHEL SARAH DAY CARE CENTER INC4× · 2018–2025 · $222k
Funded once
- YCYESHIVAS CHANOCH LENAARone grant, 2021 · $45k
- LALMAN ACHAI BUKHORIMone grant, 2017 · $33k
- UTUNITED TALMIDEI HAKVUTZEHone grant, 2019 · $18k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Religious Teaching
Ohr Yisrael is a religious institution that provides religious services and instruction to Rabbis and community members.
encourage and facilitate the observance of traditional orthodox Jewish practices around the world.
Religious and educational services
Jewish ministry and outreach to uninformed and wandering Jews in NY, Central America and elsewhere, including religious articles, education, worship, spiritual events, kosher food and other support.
TO FOCUS ON JEWISH EDUCATION AND SPIRITUALITY AND to engage with the Almighty by means of passionate prayer, to delve into the inner dimensions of the Torah, and to grow in ones relationship with Hashem.
To learn, spread, and study torah
This organization is formed for the charitable religious purpose of providing Jewish ministry, religious education, aid and support of all kinds to families, youth and persons of all ages in the Jewish community of the New York City area…
publish religious books
servicing the stamford Jewish community with religious and education programs
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Oholei Yosef Yitzchok Lubavitch Inc and the most unlike its peers is Meir Isa Bracha Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 12 years old; the field is 13. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 16% of your grantees by number, and just 15% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 55 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ALL MY CHILDREN LEARNING CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds CHABAD OF FLUSHING INC ↗
- Who funds Cheder Menachem INC ↗
- Who funds MI KAMCHA YISROEL INC ↗
- Who funds Oholei Yosef Yitzchok Lubavitch Inc ↗
- Who funds Chabad Lubavitch Hospitality Center Eshel Hachnosas Orchim ↗
- Who funds Israeli Center New Jersey Inc ↗
- Who funds GAN CHABAD ↗
- Who funds KNESET MORDECHAI ↗
- Who funds UFARATZTA FUND ↗
- Who funds United Talmidei Hakvutze Inc ↗
- Who funds CHABAD TULUM MEXICO INC ↗
- Who funds BAIS MENACHEM YOUTH DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Jewish Communal Fund · David Rachamin Foundation · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization All My Children Daycare & Nursery School funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to All My Children Daycare & Nursery School?
Find your warmest path to All My Children Daycare & Nursery School through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.