Skip to content
All Hands Raised at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

All Hands Raised

We champion racial equity in the educational system and mobilize our community to advance sustainable systems change so every child achieves their full potential, from cradle to career.

$4.2M
Granted FY2018
10
Grants FY2018
1
States reached
$4.0M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2018.

Education$7.9MYouth Development$33k
02FY2018 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2018

  • $10k–50k9 grants · $187k
  • $250k+1 grant · $4.0M
$20,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PORTLAND PUBLIC SCHOOLS$4,045,098
WILSON HIGH SCHOOL PARENT-TEACHER ASSOCIATION$47,003
FRANKLIN HIGH SCHOOL PARENT AND STUDENT-TEACHER ASSOCIATION$36,750
IRVINGTON HIGH SCHOOL PARENT-TEACHER ASSOCIATION$25,601
VERNON PARTENT-TEACHER ASSOCIATION$20,500
OPEN SCHOOL INC$11,400
NATIVE YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES$11,400
YOUTH PROGRESS ASSOCIATION$11,400
ROSEMARY ADERSON HIGH SCHOOL$11,400
ALLIANCE ALTERNATIVE - PORTLAND PUBLIC SCHOOLS$11,400
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–18) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%YOUTH PROGRESS ASSOCIATION: $11k → 12%PORTLAND PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $4.0M → 12%PORTLAND PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $3.6M → 12%ALLIANCE ALTERNATIVE - PORTLAND PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $11k → 12%KAIROSPDX: $10k → 12%VERNON PARTENT-TEACHER ASSOCIATION: $21k → 12%NATIVE YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES: $11k → 12%NATIVE YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES: $10k → 12%WILSON HIGH SCHOOL PARENT-TEACHER ASSOCIATION: $47k → 12%WILSON HIGH SCHOOL PARENT-TEACHER ASSOCIATION: $44k → 12%FRANKLIN HIGH SCHOOL PARENT AND STUDENT-TEACHER ASSOCIATION: $43k → 12%STEPHENSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PARENT-TEACHER ASSOCIATION: $12k → 12%FRANKLIN HIGH SCHOOL PARENT AND STUDENT-TEACHER ASSOCIATION: $37k → 12%OPEN SCHOOL INC: $11k → 12%ROSEMARY ADERSON HIGH SCHOOL: $11k → 12%ROSEMARY ADERSON HIGH SCHOOL: $10k → 12%OPEN SCHOOL NORTH: $10k → 12%IRVINGTON HIGH SCHOOL PARENT-TEACHER ASSOCIATION: $34k → 12%IRVINGTON HIGH SCHOOL PARENT-TEACHER ASSOCIATION: $26k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$7.9M · 7 repeat orgs$53k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2018, 0 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2018 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
2

Total granted

$7.9M
$21k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+313%

Still filing today

86%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2018, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $32k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18
EducationYouth DevelopmentHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IB
    Ida B Wells High School PTA
    2× · 2017–2018 · $91k · revenue +37%
  • PO
    PTA Oregon Congress - Irvington Elementary School
    2× · 2017–2018 · $60k · revenue +9%
  • PO
    PORTLAND OPPORTUNITIES INDUST CENTER
    2× · 2017–2018 · $21k · revenue +109%

Funded once

  • SE
    Stephenson Elementary PTA
    one grant, 2017 · $12k
  • KAIROSPDXgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +313%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Pta Oregon Congress

School PTA

—
2
Pta Colorado Congress Lafayette Elementary Pta

Excellence in education for students

—
3
Pta Oregon Congress

Provide enrichment and education funding to the school.

—
4
Pta Oregon Congress

The Ainsworth School PTA provides volunteer and financial support for educational programs student classrooms and the school community at Ainsworth Elementary School

—
5
Sellwood Middle School Pta (71 Start)

Provide support to students and staff at Sellwood Middle School in Portland OR

—
6
Lake Washington Hs Ptsa

LWHS PTSA was formed to provide an organized way for parents to aid children in the school community.

Education
7
Langley Education Campus Ptsa

We are a parent and teacher member organization for a public elementary school.

Education
8
Roanoke Elementary Parent Teacher Association

Education

—
9
Columbia Valley Gardens Pta

CVG PTA provides assistance to students and staff to help better the learning process and provide after school activities for staff and students families to attend in a safe environment.

—
10
Center for Inquiry 70 Ptsa

To help build a sense of community among parents, teachers, and students and organize social events, family-oriented activities, and collaborative projects that bring people together. This sense of community fosters a supportive network,…

—
11
Lincoln Elementary Pta

Lincoln elementary scholl pta mission is to support and speak on behalf of children and youth in the schools, in the community, and before governmental bodies and other organizations that make decisions affecting children; to assist…

—
12
Pta Oregon Congress

To support and speak on behalf of children and youth in the schools, in the community, and before governmental bodies and other organization that make decisions affecting the children. The Oregon PTA assists parents in developing the…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Open School Inc; the most unlike its peers is Stephenson Elementary Pta. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PORTLAND PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $7,609,971 · OtherPORTLAND PUBLIC SCHOOLS+6 more: $283,760 · OtherOPEN SCHOOL INC: $21,200 · EducationKAIROSPDX: $9,800 · EducationNATIVE AMERICAN YOUTH AND FAMILY CENTER: $21,200 · Youth DevelopmentYOUTH PROGRESS ASSOCIATION: $11,400 · Health
Other$7,893,731Education$31,000Youth Development$21,200Health$11,400

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPTA Oregon Congress - Irvington Elementary School: $59,601 over 2y, 22% of budgetNATIVE AMERICAN YOUTH AND FAMILY CENTER: $21,200 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOPEN SCHOOL INC: $21,200 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetYOUTH PROGRESS ASSOCIATION: $11,400 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetKAIROSPDX: $9,800 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

OCF Joseph E Weston P…Meyer Memorial TrustThe Oregon Community …James F & Marion L Mi…The Collins FoundationThe Blackbaud Giving …American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
OCF Joseph E Weston Public FoundationOR15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: OCF Joseph E Weston Public Foundation · Meyer Memorial Trust · The Oregon Community Foundation · James F & Marion L Miller Foundation · The Collins Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization All Hands Raised funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from All Hands Raised. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 21%
  • Youth Progress Association: 27% of income from government
  • Kairospdx: 22% of income from government
  • Native American Youth and Family Center: 21% of income from government
  • Portland Opportunities Indust Center: 18% of income from government
  • Open School Inc: 8% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2018, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on All Hands Raised’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home