Skip to content
All Hands on Deck Network Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

All Hands on Deck Network Inc

All hands on deck network is a national progressive policy advocacy and civic engagementorganization.

$6.0M
Granted FY2023
139
Grants FY2023
36
States reached
$397k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Civil Rights$35MPublic Benefit$21MCommunity Improvement$3.3MEnvironment$2.5MHuman Services$1.6MArts & Culture$982kEducation$710kPhilanthropy$641kOther$0
02FY2023 · 139 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 139 grants below total $5,896,929, the rows itemized in this filing. The $6,028,240 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $131,311 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k5 grants · $39k
  • $10k–50k87 grants · $2.0M
  • $50k–250k46 grants · $3.5M
  • $250k+1 grant · $397k
$25,000
Median grant
36
States reached
$20M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MOVEMENT VOTER FUND$397,429
SOUTHERN VISION ALLIANCE$178,000
OHIO VOICE$140,000
NEW DISABLED SOUTH RISING INC$140,000
COMMONWEALTH ALLIANCE VOTER ENGAGEMENT$130,000
CASA IN ACTION$110,000
FLORIDA ADVANCEMENT PROJECT INC$100,000
ISAIAH$100,000
AMERICA VOTES$100,000
FREEDOM ACTION NOW$95,000
VOTERS ORGANIZED TO EDUCATE - VOTE ACTION FUND$95,000
THE ALASKA CENTER$95,000
SHOWING UP FOR RACIAL JUSTICE ACTION INC$90,000
WORKING FAMILIES ORGANIZATION$90,000
WESTERN NATIVE VOICE$90,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–23, $2.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 86% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CAIR PHILADELPHIA: $24k → 22%CITIZEN ACTION OF NEW YORK: $25k → 14%HMONG AMERICAN WOMEN'S ASSOCIATION: $200k → 17%UNITED FOR A NEW ECONOMY: $10k → 7%NDN ACTION: $10k → 14%CASA IN ACTION: $198k → 11%CITIZEN ACTION OF NEW YORK: $10k → 14%CASA IN ACTION: $110k → 11%CITIZEN ACTION OF NEW YORK: $5k → 14%VOCAL - NY ACTION FUND: $10k → 20%AUSTIN JUSTICE COALITION: $15k → 10%AMERICAN WOMANS ASSOCIATION: $20k → 17%DURHAM PEOPLE'S ALLIANCE: $17k → 11%CASA IN ACTION: $50k → 11%IN DEFENSE OF BLACK LIVES DALLAS AT THE AFIYA CENTER: $20k → 14%CASA IN ACTION: $25k → 11%CASA IN ACTION: $13k → 11%NCAAT IN ACTION: $150k → 8%METCALFE PARK COMMUNITY BRIDGES: $10k → 17%NAVA EDUCATION PROJECT: $15k → 14%CARIBBEAN AMERICAN EDUCATION & INNOVATION FUND: $90k → 14%FORWARD TOGETHER ACTION: $10k → 10%MAKE THE ROAD STATES: $55k → 20%HOPE COMMUNITY CENTER: $5k → 13%FREEDOM INC: $73k → 10%EL PUEBLO INC: $35k → 8%GEORGIA INVESTOR ACTION FUND INC: $100k → 14%ONE COLORADO: $22k → 12%EL PUEBLO INC: $12k → 8%GEORGIA INVESTOR ACTION FUND INC: $100k → 14%ONE COLORADO: $15k → 12%GEORGIA INVESTOR ACTION FUND INC: $100k → 14%FREEDOM INC: $25k → 10%NORTH CAROLINA A PHILLIP RANDOLPH EDUCATIONAL FUND INC: $100k → 8%A PHILLIP RANDOLPH EDUCATIONAL FUND: $14k → 8%THE ANIKA FOUNDATION: $5k → 11%COMMUNITY VOICES HEARD POWER: $5k → 17%LIVING UNITED FOR CHANGE IN ARIZONA (LUCHA): $223k → 11%LIVING UNITED FOR CHANGE IN ARIZONA (LUCHA): $208k → 11%LIVING UNITED FOR CHANGE IN ARIZONA: $100k → 11%LIVING UNITED FOR CHANGE IN ARIZONA (LUCHA): $75k → 11%LUCHA: $60k → 11%LIVING UNITED FOR CHANGE IN ARIZONA (LUCHA): $53k → 11%LIVING UNITED FOR CHANGE IN ARIZONA: $50k → 11%LUCHA: $50k → 11%LUCHA: $24k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
ME
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
TN
NC
DC
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$52M · 208 repeat orgs$18M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +55% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

208 repeat relationships: 84 still active in FY2023, 124 since wound down; 36 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

208
411

Total granted

$52M
$16M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+55%
0%

Still filing today

84%
41%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.5M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
Civil RightsCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesPublic BenefitEducationEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TA
    TIDES ADVOCACY
    5× · 2019–2023 · $3.4M · revenue +75%
  • ON
    ORGANIZE NOW INC DBA ORGANIZE FLORIDA INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $1.5M · revenue +139% · 37% of their budget
  • BV
    Black Voters Matter Fund Inc
    3× · 2019–2021 · $1.2M · revenue +410%

Funded once

  • BV
    BLACK VOTERS MATTER FUND
    one grant, 2018 · $375k
  • CF
    CENTER FOR COMMUNITY CHANGE ACTION
    one grant, 2018 · $361k
  • SU
    STAND UP FOR OHIO
    one grant, 2018 · $265k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Minnesota Voice

Minnesota Voice is a collaboration of organizations working toward permanent change in social, racial, and economic justice by increasing civic engagement and voter participation across the state.

Public Benefit
2
Bold Impact

Bold Impact is a national nonprofit dedicated to supporting a democracy where all communities get to thrive.

Arts & Culture
3
Six Action

Six action realizes a bold policy agenda that secures and sustains meaningful racial, gender, social and economic justice outcomes that center the people most impacted by systemic and structural oppression. we support values-aligned state…

Civil Rights
4
Electoral Collective Action

Electoral Collective Action coordinates a broad-based coalition of existing entities active in the climate justice and community organizing space to raise public awareness and educational opportunities.

Civil Rights
5
Progressive Workers Coalition

To ensure that working class people are educated on their voting rights. The coalition engages in mobilization and educational information sessions to ensure that all workers voices are heard.

—
6
Powerswitch Action

Powerswitch action is a national network forging collective democracy and economies in our cities and states, together with our 21 grassroots affiliates.

Community Improvement
7
Action Institute Nc

Action institute nc is a community organization and citizens action group that organizes residents of low-wealth communities and constituencies most of whom are people of color- to represent their own interests on issues of social and…

—
8
Right to Democracy Project

Advance democracy, equity, and self-determination in U.S. territories through participatory advocacy, narrative and cultural change, and ecosystem building.

Civil Rights
9
Electoral Collective

Electoral Collective coordinates a broad-based coalition of existing entities active in the climate justice and community organizing space to raise public awareness and educational opportunities.

Civil Rights
10
Alabama Values

A nonpartisan grassroots communication organization that works to raise awareness and increase engagement around community issues in alabama by working directly with civic organizations advocating civic participation in communities across…

Arts & Culture
11
Wepower

We activate community power to redesign social systems to be just and equitable for all through (1) developing and supporting leaders and organizations and (2) leading campaigns, coalitions, and innovative initiatives.

Community Improvement
12
National Legal Advocacy Network Dba Glow

The National Legal Advocacy Network d/b/a Grassroots Law & Organizing for Workers is a legal non-profit organization dedicated to using legal strategies as a tool to build power for marginalized workers and create systemic change through…

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Voices of Community Activists & Leaders (Vocal-Ny) Inc; the most unlike its peers is Sowega Rising. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

406 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 406 of the 659 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

57
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
151
Early backer (in before they grew)
377/406
Grantees still filing
234/406
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TIDES ADVOCACY: $3,447,240 · OtherTIDES ADVOCACYORGANIZE NOW INC DBA ORGANIZE FLORIDA INC: $1,471,000 · OtherORGANIZE NOW INC DBA ORGANIZE FLORIDA INCBlack Voters Matter Fund Inc: $1,220,000 · Other+101 more: $20,724,222 · Other+101 moreARIZONA WINS: $1,381,000 · Civil RightsARIZONA WINSFLORIDA RISING INC: $892,500 · Civil RightsMAKE THE ROAD ACTION INC: $844,000 · Civil RightsORGANIZE PENNSYLVANIA: $715,900 · Civil RightsNEO Philanthropy Action Fund Inc: $712,120 · Civil RightsPODER: $646,898 · Civil Rights+53 more: $14,052,901 · Civil Rights+53 moreMAINE PEOPLE'S ALLIANCE: $730,500 · Community ImprovementAmerica Votes: $514,000 · Community ImprovementPEOPLE'S ACTION: $500,000 · Community ImprovementFaith in Florida Action Fund Inc: $440,000 · Community ImprovementPENNSYLVANIA STANDS UP INC: $381,000 · Community ImprovementMIJENTE: $190,000 · Community ImprovementADVANCE NORTH CAROLINA INC: $179,000 · Community ImprovementMISSOURI WIN: $175,000 · Community ImprovementWestern Native Voice Inc: $130,000 · Community Improvement+3 more: $300,000 · Community ImprovementTAKEACTION MINNESOTA: $534,500 · Public BenefitMICHIGAN ORGANIZING STRATEGY ENABLING STRENGTH ACTION: $351,000 · Public BenefitProgress Michigan Inc: $255,000 · Public BenefitSOUTHERN VISION ALLIANCE: $208,000 · Public BenefitInstituto Power: $204,000 · Public BenefitCOMMON DEFENSE CIVIC ENGAGEMENT INC: $200,000 · Public BenefitRUN FOR SOMETHING ACTION FUND: $200,000 · Public BenefitNEO Philanthropy Inc: $185,000 · Public BenefitOHIO VOICE: $140,000 · Public BenefitAct Indiana -: $115,000 · Public BenefitNew Era Colorado Action Fund: $95,000 · Public BenefitGround Game Texas: $90,000 · Public BenefitLIVING UNITED FOR CHANGE IN ARIZONA: $842,200 · Human ServicesCASA IN ACTION INC: $395,000 · Human ServicesJOLT ACTION INC: $330,000 · Human ServicesGeorgia Investor Action Fund Inc: $300,000 · Human ServicesHmong American Womens Association Inc: $220,000 · Human ServicesNCAAT IN ACTION: $150,000 · Human ServicesNORTH CAROLINA A PHILIP RANDOLPH EDUCATIONAL FUND: $114,000 · Human ServicesFREEDOM INC: $97,500 · Human ServicesCaribbean American Education & Innovation Fund: $90,000 · Human ServicesIOWA CITIZENS FOR COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT ACTION FUND: $493,550 · Food & NutritionLAND STEWARDSHIP ACTION FUND: $446,500 · Food & NutritionFLIC VOTES INC: $496,900 · InternationalONE APIA NEVADA: $236,000 · International
Other$26,862,462Civil Rights$19,245,319Community Improvement$3,539,500Public Benefit$2,577,500Human Services$2,538,700Food & Nutrition$940,050International$732,900

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTIDES ADVOCACY: $3,447,240 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetORGANIZE NOW INC DBA ORGANIZE FLORIDA INC: $1,471,000 over 2y, 37% of budgetARIZONA WINS: $1,381,000 over 4y, 10% of budgetBlack Voters Matter Fund Inc: $1,220,000 over 3y, 19% of budgetFLORIDA RISING INC: $892,500 over 5y, 8.9% of budgetMAKE THE ROAD ACTION INC: $844,000 over 5y, 9.8% of budgetLIVING UNITED FOR CHANGE IN ARIZONA: $842,200 over 4y, 8.9% of budgetMAINE PEOPLE'S ALLIANCE: $730,500 over 4y, 16% of budgetORGANIZE PENNSYLVANIA: $715,900 over 3y, 12% of budgetNEO Philanthropy Action Fund Inc: $712,120 over 4y, 2.2% of budgetPODER: $646,898 over 4y, 44% of budgetPennsylvania United: $630,000 over 4y, 11% of budgetMI FAMILIA VOTA: $629,600 over 4y, 7.0% of budgetLEADERS IGNITING TRANSFORMATION ACTION FUND INC: $617,750 over 5y, 11% of budgetFAITH IN MINNESOTA: $610,000 over 3y, 13% of budgetWORKING FAMILIES ORGANIZATION INC: $594,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetWISDOM ACTION NETWORK INC: $567,000 over 4y, 66% of budgetTEXAS FREEDOM NETWORK: $547,000 over 5y, 14% of budgetWISCONSIN MUSLIM CIVIC ALLIANCE INC: $545,429 over 5y, 95% of budgetTAKEACTION MINNESOTA: $534,500 over 5y, 6.4% of budgetAmerica Votes: $514,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetPEOPLE'S ACTION: $500,000 over 3y, 7.7% of budgetRURAL ARIZONA ACTION: $500,000 over 5y, 30% of budgetFLIC VOTES INC: $496,900 over 3y, 14% of budgetEmgage Action Inc: $495,000 over 5y, 22% of budgetIOWA CITIZENS FOR COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT ACTION FUND: $493,550 over 3y, 20% of budgetBlack Phoenix Votes: $487,676 over 3y, 54% of budgetCITIZEN ACTION OF WISCONSIN INC: $486,300 over 4y, 9.4% of budgetOUR VOICE OUR VOTE ARIZONA: $480,400 over 3y, 10% of budgetVOCES DE LA FRONTERA ACTION INC: $477,500 over 4y, 13% of budgetLAND STEWARDSHIP ACTION FUND: $446,500 over 5y, 75% of budgetFaith in Florida Action Fund Inc: $440,000 over 2y, 81% of budgetPONTIAC POLICY ACTION FUND: $435,000 over 3y, 100% of budgetACTION FOR LIBERATION: $431,000 over 2y, 21% of budgetDurham For All: $427,100 over 4y, 19% of budgetBLACK MALE VOTER PROJECT: $427,000 over 3y, 6.7% of budgetNEW GEORGIA PROJECT ACTION FUND: $410,000 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetEQUALITY FLORIDA ACTION INC: $395,000 over 3y, 21% of budgetCASA IN ACTION INC: $395,000 over 3y, 16% of budgetCENTER FOR POPULAR DEMOCRACY ACTION FUND INC: $385,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetFreedom Action Now: $382,500 over 4y, 13% of budgetPENNSYLVANIA STANDS UP INC: $381,000 over 5y, 12% of budget215 Peoples Alliance: $375,000 over 5y, 68% of budgetCAROLINA FEDERATION: $373,956 over 3y, 24% of budgetFREE THE BALLOT INCARCERATED VOTER FAMILY NETWORK: $357,500 over 3y, 85% of budgetASIAN AMERICAN ADVOCACY FUND INC: $349,725 over 4y, 7.6% of budget1HOOD POWER: $347,880 over 4y, 47% of budgetLEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS INC: $342,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Tides AdvocacySixteen Thirty FundAmerica VotesWay to Win Action Fun…Open Society Action F…Women Donors Network …Pro-Democracy CampaignWorking Families Orga…NEO Philanthropy Acti…State Engagement FundCenter for Community …Proteus Action League
Tides AdvocacyCA228.5× affinity158 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Tides Advocacy · Sixteen Thirty Fund · America Votes · Way to Win Action Fund Inc · Open Society Action Fund Inc · Women Donors Network Action · Pro-Democracy Campaign · Working Families Organization Inc · NEO Philanthropy Action Fund Inc · State Engagement Fund · Center for Community Change Action · Proteus Action League

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization All Hands on Deck Network Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from All Hands on Deck Network Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 130%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    13get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to All Hands on Deck Network Inc?

    Find your warmest path to All Hands on Deck Network Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 659 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on All Hands on Deck Network’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home