Skip to content

· Private foundation

Alice Lindquist Family Trust

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$13k
Granted FY2023
12
Grants FY2023
2
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Philanthropy$18kHousing & Shelter$6kEducation$6kFood & Nutrition$4kAnimals$4kHuman Services$4kCrime & Legal$2kRecreation & Sports$2kOther$0
02FY2023 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ASSISTANCE & RESOURCE CENTER$2,000
COCO'S HEART DOG RESCUE$2,000
RIVER FALLS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$2,000
UNITED WAY OF ST CROIX VALLEY$1,500
RIVER FALLS SUNSHINE FUND$1,301
PIERCE COUNTY FOOD PANTRY$1,000
OUR NEIGHBORS' PLACE$1,000
RHINO'S FOUNDATION$1,000
ST CROIX VALLEY FOOD BANK$500
TURNINGPOINT$500
OUR NEIGHBORS' PLACE$500
NATL CHILD SAFETY COUNCIL$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 10% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%UNITED WAY OF ST CROIX VALLEY: $2k → 5%RIVER FALLS SUNSHINE FUND: $1k → 9%UNITED WAY OF ST CROIX VALLEY: $2k → 5%UNITED WAY OF ST CROIX VALLEY: $2k → 5%UNITED WAY OF ST CROIX VALLEY: $2k → 5%UNITED WAY OF ST CROIX VALLEY: $2k → 5%UNITED WAY OF ST CROIX VALLEY: $2k → 5%UNITED WAY OF ST CROIX VALLEY: $2k → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$41k · 9 repeat orgs$4k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2023, 2 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
1

Total granted

$41k
$1k

Still filing today

56%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
Human ServicesFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterAnimalsHealthPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ON
    OUR NEIGHBORS PLACE INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $6k · revenue +186%
  • CH
    COCO'S HEART DOG RESCUE
    2× · 2022–2023 · $4k · revenue +30%
  • RF
    River Falls Community Food Pantry
    3× · 2017–2019 · $2k · revenue +77%

Funded once

  • BY
    BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY-IDAHO
    one grant, 2019 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sun Prairie Emergency Food Pantry Inc

Provide food & personal care items to families in need.

—
2
Waushara County Food Pantry Inc

We provide food, household and personal items as available to combat food scarcity and poverty in our community.

Food & Nutrition
3
Columbia Falls Food Bank

Provide food to local needy

Food & Nutrition
4
Waupaca Area Food Pantry Inc

To supply food to the under privileged.

Food & Nutrition
5
Kettle Falls Community Chest

Food is collected through donations and purchases, then distributed on an as needed basis.

—
6
North County Community Food Bank

Emergency food services provided to families in need.

Food & Nutrition
7
Thief River Falls Area Food Shelf

To provide food for the needy.

Food & Nutrition
8
Fergus Falls Community Food Shelf

Provide food for low income and needy people

—
9
Crosslake Food Shelf

Providing food and necessities to local families in need

Food & Nutrition
10
Antigo Area Community Food Pantry

Free food pantry. The Organization distributes free food to over 100 needy families per week, totaling almost 5000 visits per year. Over 70 individual volunteers receive, organize, and distribute over 200,000 pounds of food annually.

Food & Nutrition
11
Rutland Area Foodshelf Inc

To combat hunger in rutland county by providing food to those in need.

Food & Nutrition
12
Watertown Food Pantry

Distribution of food to the needy residents in the City of Watertown and surrounding rural communities falling into the Watertown School District. Patrons may come every 30 days.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Croix Valley Foodbank Inc; the most unlike its peers is Our Neighbors Place Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

RIVER FALLS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5,500 · OtherRIVER FALLS COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONASSISTANCE & RESOURCE CENTER INC: $4,500 · OtherASSISTANCE & RESOURCE CENTER INCTURNINGPOINT: $4,300 · OtherTURNINGPOINTPIERCE COUNTY FOOD PANTRY: $2,000 · OtherPIERCE COUNTY FOOD PANTRYUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN: $2,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSINBRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY-IDAHO: $1,000 · OtherUNITED WAY ST CROIX AND RED CEDAR VALLEYS INC: $12,000 · Human ServicesUNITED WAY ST CROIX AND RED CEDAR…RIVER FALLS SUNSHINE FUND INC: $1,301 · Human ServicesRIVER FALLS SUNSHINE FUND INCOUR NEIGHBORS PLACE INC: $5,500 · Housing & ShelterOUR NEIGHBORS…COCO'S HEART DOG RESCUE: $4,000 · AnimalsCOCO'S HEA…River Falls Community Food Pantry: $1,500 · Food & NutritionST CROIX VALLEY FOODBANK INC: $500 · Food & NutritionRHINOS FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · HealthNATIONAL CHILD SAFETY COUNCIL: $100 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$19,300Human Services$13,301Housing & Shelter$5,500Animals$4,000Food & Nutrition$2,000Health$1,000Public Safety & Disaster$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNITED WAY ST CROIX AND RED CEDAR VALLEYS INC: $12,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetOUR NEIGHBORS PLACE INC: $5,500 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetASSISTANCE & RESOURCE CENTER INC: $4,500 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetCOCO'S HEART DOG RESCUE: $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetRiver Falls Community Food Pantry: $1,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetRIVER FALLS SUNSHINE FUND INC: $1,301 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetRHINOS FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetST CROIX VALLEY FOODBANK INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL CHILD SAFETY COUNCIL: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNITED WAY ST CROIX AND RED CEDAR VALLEYS INC ↗
  • Who funds OUR NEIGHBORS PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds ASSISTANCE & RESOURCE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds COCO'S HEART DOG RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds River Falls Community Food Pantry ↗
  • Who funds RIVER FALLS SUNSHINE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds RHINOS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ST CROIX VALLEY FOODBANK INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL CHILD SAFETY COUNCIL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fred C and Katherine B Andersen FoundationMN17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fred C and Katherine B Andersen Foundation · Hugh J Andersen Foundation · St Croix Valley Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust · Land O'Lakes Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Viola E Lundeberg Trust · Green Bay Packers Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Alice Lindquist Family Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Alice Lindquist Family Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Alice Lindquist Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph