· Private foundation
Alice Jenkins Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HUMANE SOCIETY OF BOULDER VALLEY | $2,000 |
| DUMB FRIENDS LEAGUE | $2,000 |
| LONGMONT HUMANE SOCIETY | $2,000 |
| HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE PIKES PEAK RE | $2,000 |
| ROCKY MOUNTAIN RAPTOR PROGRAM | $2,000 |
| JOURNEY HOME ANIMAL CARE CENTER | $2,000 |
| ANIMAL FRIENDS ALLIANCE | $2,000 |
| ARK-VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY | $2,000 |
| COLORADO HORSE RESCUE | $2,000 |
| UPPER RIO GRANDE ANIMAL SOCIETY | $2,000 |
| PUEBLO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY | $1,965 |
| GREENWOOD WILDLIFE REHABILITATION C | $1,900 |
| BLUE ROSE RANCH INC | $1,800 |
| GRAND RIVERS HUMANE SOCIETY | $1,500 |
| DELTA COUNTY CITIZENS FOR ANIMAL WE | $1,200 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 93% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +43% since the first grant, against -36% for the ones you funded once.
26 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- DDDENVER DUMB FRIENDS LEAGUE6× · 2020–2025 · $12k · revenue +329%
- CHCOLORADO HORSE RESCUE6× · 2020–2025 · $11k · revenue +68%
- THTHE HUMANE SOCIETY OF BOULDER VALLEY INC6× · 2020–2025 · $11k · revenue +37%
Funded once
- ACAWR CAT TAILS RESCUEone grant, 2020 · $2k
- FRFRONT RANGE FREEDOM RESCUE INCone grant, 2022 · $300 · revenue -36%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Dog Rescue Dogs Unbroken supports Colorado dogs at higher risk for euthanasia evaluating their behavioral stability and applying training methods appropriate for their needs. The goal of helping each dog learn to make good choices in…
Animal rescue organization dedicated to finding homes for animals at the animal shelter. we also provde vet care foster homes, and assistance with homing for special needs animals.
The mission is to protect and care for homeless animals in the Dillon and Beaverhead county area.
To help injured, abandoned and unwanted animals. We provide food, vet care that includes heartworm prevention and spay or neuter services, shelter and anything else needed.
Lucky Day Animal Rescue of Colorado LDAR serves the public as a 501c3 tax exempt, non-profit organization dedicated to the rescue of homeless and abandoned animals in Colorado and surrounding areas. We rescue, rehabilitate and find homes…
Colorado Kitty Coalition's (CKC) current purpose/mission is to rescue, rehabilitate, and re-home cats in need. Through a network of dedicated foster homes, we provide them with love, safety and a chance for a loving home. We commit to…
Rescue of abused or abandoned animals
Columbia Gorge Humane Society is committed to promoting healthy, safe and lifelong relationships between people and their pets through sustainable programs of education, adoption and spay/neutering. We will endeavor to fight for the abused…
Animal shelter and rescue
Animal Rescue - finding homes for abandoned animals in Granite City, spaying and neutering stray animals and feral cats
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Humane Society of Boulder Valley Inc and the most unlike its peers is National Mill Dog Rescue. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UPPER RIO GRANDE ANIMAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds DENVER DUMB FRIENDS LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds COLORADO HORSE RESCUE ↗
- Who funds Journey Home Animal Center ↗
- Who funds THE HUMANE SOCIETY OF BOULDER VALLEY INC ↗
- Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN RAPTOR PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds BLUE ROSE RANCH INC ↗
- Who funds ARK-VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds ANIMAL FRIENDS ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds DELTA COUNTY CITIZENS FOR ANIMAL WELFARE ↗
- Who funds BORN FREE WILDLIFE REHABILITATION ↗
- Who funds PUEBLO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds LONGMONT HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds National Mill Dog Rescue ↗
- Who funds ANIMAL RESCUE OF THE ROCKIES ↗
- Who funds HAPPY CATS HAVEN INC ↗
- Who funds NORTHERN COLORADO FRIENDS OF FERALS ↗
- Who funds NATURE AND WILDLIFE DISCOVERY CENTER ↗
- Who funds Longhopes Donkey Shelter Inc ↗
- Who funds FELINE RESCUE NETWORK ↗
- Who funds GRAND RIVERS HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds THE MAXFUND INC ↗
- Who funds FRONT RANGE FREEDOM RESCUE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · El Pomar Foundation · Mary Elizabeth Bates Foundation · Animal Assistance Foundation · Petco Love · Lauretta Boyd Charitable Trust · Lucile Drinkwater Allen Trust · Xcel Energy Foundation · Pedigree Foundation · Petsmart Charities Inc · Dr Mary Bates Trust Fund · The Summerlee Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Alice Jenkins Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Alice Jenkins Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Alice Jenkins Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.