Skip to content
Alice C Tyler Perpetual Trust Attn Anders Brown Chairman at a glance

· Private foundation

Alice C Tyler Perpetual Trust Attn Anders Brown Chairman

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$633k
Granted FY2024still arriving
20
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$71k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Environment$2.2MAnimals$734kEducation$545kInternational$115kHuman Services$105kArts & Culture$94kCrime & Legal$60kYouth Development$44kOther$0
02FY2024 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $302k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $306k
$40,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOOKTRAILS$71,362
CRAG LAW CENTER$70,000
OCEANOGRAPHIC TEACHING STATIONS$65,000
WOODLAND PARK ZOO$50,000
Individual grant recipient$50,000
REWILD FOR BIONESIA$46,608
LAKE HOPATCONG FOUNDATION$45,000
LAUDATO SI' MOVEMENT$40,000
BLACK IN MARINE SCIENCE$40,000
BLACK WOMEN IN ECOLOGY EVOLUTION AND MARINE SCIENCE INC$40,000
WETLANDS AND WILDLIFE CARE CENTER$35,170
REWILD FOR JANE GOODALL INSTITUTE NEPAL$30,000
WATERSHED ASSOCIATION$25,000
NESTUCCA ANGLERS$7,295
REWILD FOR RARCCI$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–20, $105k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MILLION LITTLE: $39k → 14%MILLION LITTLE: $35k → 14%MILLION LITTLE: $31k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
OR
NV
NJ
CA
CO
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

63%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.5M · 20 repeat orgs$1.4M to everyone else

20 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
33

Total granted

$2.5M
$1.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
+86%

Still filing today

90%
48%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $245k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentAnimalsEducationRecreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • REWILD
    4× · 2017–2024 · $267k · revenue +550%
  • WP
    WOODLAND PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY
    4× · 2018–2024 · $215k · revenue +62%
  • BT
    BOOK TRAILS INC
    3× · 2018–2024 · $196k · revenue +179% · 26% of their budget

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $100k
  • WF
    WOMEN FOR WILDLIFE NETWORK
    one grant, 2022 · $100k
  • C
    CRAG
    one grant, 2021 · $75k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wildcoast

The mission of wildcoast is to conserve coastal and marine ecosystems and address climate change through natural solutions. our staff is dedicated to conserving threatened and endangered coastlines and wildlife in california and mexico.…

Environment
2
Washington Wild

Washington wild protects and restores wild lands and waters in washington state through advocacy, education and civic engagement.

Animals
3
Coast Fork Willamette Watershed Council

The Coast Fork Willamette Watershed Council is a local nonprofit organization that strives to enhance and restore habitat for fish and wildlife our community and for future generations. Our Board of Directors consists of seven members with…

Environment
4
Cascadia Wildlands

Cascadia wildlands defends and restores cacasia's wild ecosystems in the forests,in the courts, and in the streets. we envision vast old-growth forests, rivers full of wild salmon, wolves howling in the backcountry, a stable climate, and…

Environment
5
Oregon Natural Resources Council Fund Oregon Wild

Oregon Wild works to protect and restore Oregon's wildlands, wildlife and waters as an enduring legacy for future generations.

Environment
6
Oikonos - Ecosystem Knowledge

Oikonos studies and protects imperiled ecosystems by engaging diverse communities through innovative scientific and artistic collaborations.

Science & Tech
7
Western Rivers Conservancy

Western rivers conservancy's mission is to protect outstanding river ecosystems in the western united states. continued on schedule o.we acquire land to conserve critical habitat, provide public access for compatible use and enjoyment, and…

Environment
8
Wildearth Guardians

Wildearth guardians works to protect and restore the wildlife, wild places, wild rivers, and health of the american west.

Unclassified
9
Orca Conservancy

Orca conservancy is working on behalf of orcinus orca, the killer whale, and protecting the wild places on which it depends.

Animals
10
Washington Wildlife & Recreation Coalition

Creating a greener, healthier, more equitable, and better Washington for all through community outreach, network building, and advocacy for conservation and outdoor recreation funding.

—
11
Wild Orca

Translating science into action to save Southern Resident killer whales from extinction.

Animals
12
Great Peninsula Conservancy

Preserve in perpetuity the natural habitats, rural landscapes, and open spaces of the great peninsula of washington's puget sound.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wildlife Conservation Network Inc; the most unlike its peers is Blackat Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

41 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 41 of the 63 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
14
Early backer (in before they grew)
40/41
Grantees still filing
32/41
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $177,680 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTONENVIRONMENTAL LAW ALLIANCE WORLDWIDE: $115,000 · OtherENVIRONMENTAL LAW ALLIANCE WORLDWIDEIndividual grant recipient: $100,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWOMEN FOR WILDLIFE NETWORK: $100,000 · OtherWOMEN FOR WILDLIFE NETWORKUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO: $100,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGOCRAG: $75,000 · OtherWASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY: $60,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $54,050 · OtherMILLION LITTLE: $104,525 · OtherMILLION LITTLE+23 more: $669,135 · Other+23 moreHEAL THE BAY: $185,000 · EnvironmentHEAL THE BAYPALOS VERDES PENINSULA LAND CONSERVANCY: $167,500 · EnvironmentPALOS VERDES PENINSULA LAN…CRAG LAW CENTER: $135,000 · EnvironmentCRAG LAW CENTERWILLAMETTE RIVERKEEPER: $90,000 · EnvironmentWILLAMETTE RIVERKEEPEROregon Environmental Council: $90,000 · EnvironmentOregon Environmental Counc…MT ADAMS RESOURCE STEWARDS: $70,000 · EnvironmentMT ADAMS RESOURCE STEWARDSGREEN OUR PLANET: $50,000 · EnvironmentGREEN OUR PLANETHuman Access Project: $45,000 · EnvironmentOrange County Coastkeeper: $42,125 · EnvironmentColumbia Riverkeeper: $40,000 · Environment+2 more: $20,000 · EnvironmentREWILD: $266,738 · AnimalsREWILDWOODLAND PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $215,000 · AnimalsWOODLAND PARK ZOOLOGIC…ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF SAN DIEGO: $190,000 · AnimalsZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF …Wetlands and Wildlife Care Center: $35,170 · AnimalsXERCES SOCIETY INC: $35,000 · Animals+4 more: $29,008 · AnimalsBOOK TRAILS INC: $196,362 · EducationBOOK TRAIL…Oceanographic Teaching Stations Inc: $90,000 · EducationOceanograp…BLACK WOMEN IN ECOLOGY EVOLUTION AND MARINE SCIENCE INC: $40,000 · EducationBLACK WOME…ACCESS BOOKS: $37,672 · EducationACCESS BOO…For The Good: $115,000 · InternationalLAKE HOPATCONG FOUNDATION: $95,000 · Recreation & SportsChehalem Center Association dba Chehalem Cultural Center: $17,005 · Recreation & Sports+1 more: $2,500 · Recreation & SportsORANGE COUNTY BIRD OF PREY CENTER: $73,000 · Youth DevelopmentOREGON BRAVO YOUTH ORCHESTRAS: $40,000 · Youth Development
Other$1,555,390Environment$934,625Animals$770,916Education$364,034International$115,000Recreation & Sports$114,505Youth Development$113,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetREWILD: $266,738 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetWOODLAND PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $215,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBOOK TRAILS INC: $196,362 over 3y, 26% of budgetZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF SAN DIEGO: $190,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHEAL THE BAY: $185,000 over 4y, 2.0% of budgetPALOS VERDES PENINSULA LAND CONSERVANCY: $167,500 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetCRAG LAW CENTER: $135,000 over 3y, 3.3% of budgetFor The Good: $115,000 over 3y, 21% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL LAW ALLIANCE WORLDWIDE: $115,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetLAKE HOPATCONG FOUNDATION: $95,000 over 2y, 7.1% of budgetOceanographic Teaching Stations Inc: $90,000 over 2y, 7.2% of budgetWILLAMETTE RIVERKEEPER: $90,000 over 2y, 4.3% of budgetOregon Environmental Council: $90,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetORANGE COUNTY BIRD OF PREY CENTER: $73,000 over 2y, 9.4% of budgetMT ADAMS RESOURCE STEWARDS: $70,000 over 2y, 4.3% of budgetGREEN OUR PLANET: $50,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetHuman Access Project: $45,000 over 1y, 43% of budgetOrange County Coastkeeper: $42,125 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetBLACK WOMEN IN ECOLOGY EVOLUTION AND MARINE SCIENCE INC: $40,000 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetFARMERS CONSERVATION ALLIANCE: $40,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBLACK IN MARINE SCIENCE: $40,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetColumbia Riverkeeper: $40,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetACCESS BOOKS: $37,672 over 1y, 7.2% of budgetOJAI FESTIVALS LTD: $37,200 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetWetlands and Wildlife Care Center: $35,170 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetXERCES SOCIETY INC: $35,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetAUSTIN WALDORF SCHOOL INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetGORGE GROWN FOOD NETWORK: $25,000 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetWILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK INC: $19,008 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetChehalem Center Association dba Chehalem Cultural Center: $17,005 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetGREATER EDWARDS AQUIFER ALLIANCE: $15,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetGORGE ECOLOGY OUTDOORS: $5,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetWILDLIFE CENTER OF THE NORTH COAST: $5,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE OSA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetROSE HAVEN CIC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBlackat Foundation: $2,500 over 1y, 27% of budgetTHE OREGON ZOO FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThink Wild: $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Oregon Community …Meyer Memorial TrustThe Collins FoundationThe Roundhouse Founda…PatagoniaorgEarth Day OregonRonald W Naito Md Fou…The Schmidt Family Fo…The Autzen FoundationM J Murdock Charitabl…Wiancko Charitable Fo…Jubitz Family Foundat…
The Oregon Community FoundationOR25.1× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · Meyer Memorial Trust · The Collins Foundation · The Roundhouse Foundation · Patagoniaorg · Earth Day Oregon · Ronald W Naito Md Foundation · The Schmidt Family Foundation · The Autzen Foundation · M J Murdock Charitable Trust · Wiancko Charitable Foundation Inc · Jubitz Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Alice C Tyler Perpetual Trust Attn Anders Brown Chairman funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Alice C Tyler Perpetual Trust Attn Anders Brown Chairman. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 80%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 15%
  • Willamette Riverkeeper: 42% of income from government
  • Xerces Society Inc: 22% of income from government
  • Farmers Conservation Alliance: 15% of income from government
  • Think Wild: 7% of income from government
  • Columbia Riverkeeper: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
14report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Alice C Tyler Perpetual Trust Attn Anders Brown Chairman?

Find your warmest path to Alice C Tyler Perpetual Trust Attn Anders Brown Chairman through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 63 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Alice C Tyler Perpetual Trust Attn Anders Brown Chairman’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home