Skip to content

· Private foundation

Alice & Charles Schneider Char Tr

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$22k
Granted FY2025still arriving
22
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$21kHuman Services$19kFood & Nutrition$13kArts & Culture$13kHousing & Shelter$11kHealth$9kPublic Benefit$6kCivil Rights$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$79k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
1st Unitarian Church$2,000
LightHouse Yth Svcs$2,000
Womans City Club$2,000
Clifton Untd Meth Church$2,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$1,500
FreeStore Food Bank$1,500
Cincinnatusorg$1,500
Playhouse in the Park$1,250
1st U U Church$1,100
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Cinn Symphony Orch Fund$1,000
League Women Voters$1,000
HOELESS COALITION$1,000
IHN Foundhouse$620
CINCINNATI PUBLIC RADIO$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Helping Hands: $2k → 13%Braver Angels: $500 → 17%Helping Hands: $1k → 13%Helping Hands: $1k → 13%Helping Hands: $750 → 13%Lghthouse Youth Services: $2k → 16%New Life Furniture: $850 → 16%New Life Furniture: $500 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NY
OH
PA
CA
KY
DC
AL
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$80k · 21 repeat orgs$38k to everyone else

21 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
57

Total granted

$80k
$34k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+7%
+9%

Still filing today

24%
18%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterArts & CultureFood & NutritionCivil RightsRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SV
    Shelterhouse Volunteer Group Inc
    4× · 2020–2024 · $3k · revenue +19%
  • OD
    OUR DAILY BREAD
    3× · 2021–2024 · $3k · revenue +7%
  • NL
    NEW LIFE FURNITURE BANK
    2× · 2021–2024 · $1k · revenue +146%

Funded once

  • FU
    First UU Church
    one grant, 2020 · $4k
  • WC
    Womems City Club
    one grant, 2021 · $2k
  • LY
    LIGHTHOUSE YOUTH SERVICESgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $2k · revenue +68%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Legal Aid Society of Cincinnati

To resolve serious legal problems of low income people, to promote economic and family stability, and reduce poverty through effective legal assistance.

—
2
Cincinnati Usa Regional Chamber

To grow the vibrancy and economic prosperity of the cincinnati region.

—
3
The Home Ownership Center of Greater Cincinnati in

The home ownership center is a non-profit that has been serving the cincinnati metro area since 1973, and is a member of the neighbor works network.

Housing & Shelter
4
Nashville Public Radio

Nashville public radio's mission is to be the most trusted & independent nashville voice, connecting our communities through non-partisan journalism, compelling storytelling, civil conversation and music discovery.

Arts & Culture
5
World Affairs Council - Cincinnati & Northern Kentucky

The World Affairs Council, a 501(c)3 nonprofit, is the bridge that connects the world to one of America's most vibrant regions. Through Global education, International exchange, and cultural awareness initiatives, the council strengthens…

—
6
Strategies to End Homelessness Inc

Strategies to End Homelessness leads a coordinated community effort to end homelessness in Greater Cincinnati.

Human Services
7
Cincinnati Afl-Cio Labor Council

The mission of the afl-cio is to improve the lives of working families, to bring economic justice to the workplace and social justice to our nation.

—
8
Cincinnati Parks Foundation

To build broad based private/public partnerships supporting the conservation and enhancement of our City's parks and greenspaces.

Recreation & Sports
9
Greater Columbus Chamber of Commerce

Advancing a thriving central ohio commmunity by serving as a catalyst for all businesses to grow and flourish. our mission pillars are connections, government relations, strategic business solutions and talent/workforce.

—
10
Legal Aid Society of Cleveland

See schedule o.legal aid's mission is to secure justice, equity and access to opportunity for and with people who have low incomes through passionate legal representation and advocacy for systematic change.

—
11
Cincinnati Playhouse in the Park

We are Cincinnati's national theater - committed to bringing diverse, engaging works of great artistry to our community, and to putting Cincinnati's artistic excellence in the national spotlight.

Arts & Culture
12
Colorado Center On Law and Policy

Colorado center on law and policy is an antipoverty organization advancing the rights of every coloradan.

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Freestore Foodbank Inc; the most unlike its peers is Womens City Club. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 86 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/19
Grantees still filing
11/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

IHN Foundhouse: $8,739 · OtherIHN FoundhouseWomans City Club: $7,200 · OtherWomans City ClubLightHouse Yth Svcs: $5,300 · OtherLightHouse Yth SvcsCincinnatusorg: $4,250 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $3,875 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $3,840 · OtherClifton Untd Meth Church: $3,800 · OtherFirst UU Church: $3,780 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $3,400 · Other+65 more: $52,930 · Other+65 moreHELPING HANDS OF GREENUP INC: $5,200 · Human ServicesLIGHTHOUSE YOUTH SERVICES: $1,750 · Human ServicesNEW LIFE FURNITURE BANK: $1,350 · Human ServicesBraver AngelsInc: $500 · Human ServicesFREESTORE FOODBANK INC: $6,500 · Food & NutritionShelterhouse Volunteer Group Inc: $3,400 · Housing & ShelterFEDERATION OF APPALACHIAN HOUSING ENTERPRISES INC: $1,000 · Housing & ShelterHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $750 · EducationNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SCHOLARS INC: $150 · EducationCincinnati Public Radio Inc: $500 · Arts & CultureCINCINNATI MUSEUM ASSOCIATION: $300 · Arts & CultureARC OF APPALACHIA: $500 · Recreation & Sports
Other$97,114Human Services$8,800Food & Nutrition$6,500Housing & Shelter$4,400Education$900Arts & Culture$800Recreation & Sports$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFREESTORE FOODBANK INC: $6,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHELPING HANDS OF GREENUP INC: $5,200 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetShelterhouse Volunteer Group Inc: $3,400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetOUR DAILY BREAD: $2,750 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLIGHTHOUSE YOUTH SERVICES: $1,750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW LIFE FURNITURE BANK: $1,350 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWOMENS CITY CLUB: $1,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetFEDERATION OF APPALACHIAN HOUSING ENTERPRISES INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCincinnati Public Radio Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBraver AngelsInc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARC OF APPALACHIA: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCINCINNATI MUSEUM ASSOCIATION: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSIERRA CLUB: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SCHOLARS INC: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOHIO JUSTICE AND POLICY CENTER: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FREESTORE FOODBANK INC ↗
  • Who funds HELPING HANDS OF GREENUP INC ↗
  • Who funds Shelterhouse Volunteer Group Inc ↗
  • Who funds OUR DAILY BREAD ↗
  • Who funds LIGHTHOUSE YOUTH SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds NEW LIFE FURNITURE BANK ↗
  • Who funds WOMENS CITY CLUB ↗
  • Who funds FEDERATION OF APPALACHIAN HOUSING ENTERPRISES INC ↗
  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Greater Cincinnati FoundationOH18.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Greater Cincinnati Foundation · John a Schroth Family Char Tr · Elsa M Heisel Sule Charitable Trust 2005 · Ruth J & Robert a Conway Foundation Inc · Ed & Joann Hubert Family Foundation Inc · William P Anderson Foundation Central Trust · Carol Ann and Ralph V Haile Jr Foundation · Johnson Charitable Gift Fund · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Alice & Charles Schneider Char Tr funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Alice & Charles Schneider Char Tr. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 86 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Alice & Charles Schneider Char Tr’s filings →

    More from the funding graph