How much did ALFRED J MCALLISTER AND DOROTHY N grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 50% of ALFRED J MCALLISTER AND DOROTHY N’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2020

scouts

2021

—

2022

—

2023

—

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k5 grants · $33k
$10k–50k18 grants · $400k
$50k–250k2 grants · $105k

$19,700

Median grant

States reached

$14M

Total assets

Largest grants

FOOD FINDERS FOOD BANK INC$55,000
BAUER FAMILY RESOURSES INC$50,000
PAWS & CLAWS ANIMAL SHELTER INC$42,000
LAFAYETTE PARKS FOUNDATION$38,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$33,800
SALVATION ARMY$27,000
LAFAYETTE URBAN MINISTRY$27,000
SEEDS OF HOPE COMMUNITY MINISTRIES$25,500
YMCA CAMP TECUMSEH$25,000
ASSOCIATION FOR SPACE SCIENCE ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY INC$25,000
SAGAMORE COUNCIL BOY SCOUNTS OF AMERICA$22,000
THOMAS DUNCAN HALL INC$21,000
JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT$19,700
THE LAFAYETTE POLICE FOUNDATION INC$16,900
LTHC HOMELESS SERVICES$15,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $340k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16% — the area typically sits at 14%. 65% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$2.4M · 28 repeat orgs$292k to everyone else

28 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$2.4M

$233k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%

+52%

Still filing today

46%

40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $59k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesAnimalsEnvironmentYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

FF
FOOD FINDERS FOOD BANK INC
4× · 2021–2024 · $189k · revenue +36%
IT
IVY TECH FOUNDATION
3× · 2021–2023 · $149k · revenue +60%
NL
NICHES LAND TRUST
5× · 2020–2024 · $125k · revenue +89%

Funded once

FF
FOOD FINDERS
one grant, 2020 · $60k
YO
YMCA OF GREATER LAFAYETTE
one grant, 2021 · $31k
WC
WABASH CENTER
one grant, 2022 · $30k · revenue -2%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Greater Laporte Chamber of Commerce

Chamber of commerce for laporte, indiana

—

Humane Indiana Inc

To lead the community in the humane treatment of animals.

Animals

Lafayette Urban Enterprise Associat

Direct enterprise zone activities and reinvestment in the city of lafayette, indiana.

Community Improvement

Central Indiana Land Trust Incorporated

The central indiana land trust, inc. preserves the best of central indiana's natural areas, protecting plants and animals, so hoosiers can experience the wonder of the state's natural heritage.

Environment

Habitat for Humanity of Lafayette

Provide affordable homes to low income families

Housing & Shelter

Wilderness Louisville Inc

We are stewards of natural areas and champions of nature education, recreation, and youth. our mission is to provide and sustain quality natural spaces in louisville and ensure there is equitable access for the community.

Environment

Shirley Heinze Land Trust Inc

To preserve and restore natural lands and waters in northwestern indiana, and to engage people in nature and conservation

Environment

Greater Lansing Food Bank

Partner to alleviate hunger one meal at a time.

Food & Nutrition

Red-Tail Land Conservancy Inc

Red-tail conservancy preserves, protects, and restores natural areas and farm land in east central indiana while increasing awareness of our natural heritage.

Environment

Indiana Association of United Ways Inc

Indiana united way is the leading voice to advocate, engage, and partner with a strong united way network and key stakeholders to advance human well-being throughout indiana.

Philanthropy

Lafayette College

Provision of educational services as an accredited four-year undergraduate college.

Education

Ad-in Inc

Adoptions of indiana seeks to identify and meet the needs of adoptees and birth and adoptive families through compassionate and comprehensive adoption services.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ivy Tech Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is First United Methodist Church. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 45 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 14% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/24

the rest of the field

11%

935/8,586

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

21 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

21/21

Grantees still filing

16/21

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$1,469,650Human Services$389,567Philanthropy$286,000Food & Nutrition$189,000Education$149,000Environment$134,500Youth Development$108,300

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Lafayette CommunityIN28.9× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Lafayette Community · Sia Foundation Inc · Coffin Family Foundation Inc · The Scheumann Foundation Inc · James K and Mary Jo Risk Family Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater Lafayette · Lilly Endowment Inc · The McAllister Foundation · North Central Health Services Inc · Arconic Foundation · Central Indiana Community Foundation Inc · Duke Energy Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation ALFRED J MCALLISTER AND DOROTHY N funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: ASSOCIATION FOR SPACE SCIENCE ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY INC.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~17 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 2.9× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 351890162 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on ASSOCIATION FOR SPACE SCIENCE ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY INC, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 17 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 32% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Alfred J McAllister and Dorothy N?

Find your warmest path to Alfred J McAllister and Dorothy N through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

ALFRED J MCALLISTER AND DOROTHY N

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

21 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Alfred J McAllister and Dorothy N?

More from the funding graph

ALFRED J MCALLISTER AND DOROTHY N

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

21 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Alfred J McAllister and Dorothy N?

More from the funding graph