Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Alexandria Economic Development Partnership Inc

To promote the city of Alexandria as a premier location for businesses by capitalizing on its assets including multiple metro stations, historical character and riverfront location, in order to enhance the city's tax revenue and increase employment opportunities.

$534k
Granted FY2023
8
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 97% of Alexandria Economic Development Partnership Inc’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2023 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $18k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $517k
$83,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Old Town Business$100,000
Del Ray Business Association$95,765
Eisenhower Ave Public Private Partnership Inc$88,000
Old Town North Alliance$83,000
West End Business Association$50,000
Alexandria Minority Business Association$50,000
Social Responsibility Group$50,000
Alexandria Chamber of Commerce$17,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–21, $35k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 5%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 5%Young Men's Christian Association of Metropolitan Washington: $20k → 9%HOPKINS HOUSE-A CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND THEIR FAMILIES: $15k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Northern Anne Arundel County Chamber of Commerce

To promote business and economic development through network opportunities, community involvement, education and legislative liaison.

2
Kids First Years

Our mission is to align, strengthen and sustain early childhood systems through collective leadership, equity, and innovation. to ensure every child in the City of Alexandria has a strong start in life.

Human Services
3
Aia Virginia

AIA Virginia is the voice of the architecture profession in the Commonwealth of Virginia dedicated to serving its members, advancing their value, and improving the quality of the built environment.

4
Alexandria Education Foundation

The Alexandria Education Foundation is comitted to support excellence in education and expanding learning opportunities in Alexandria Public Schools.

Education
5
Volunteer Alexandria

Volunteer Alexandria is committed to building a stronger community by inspiring and mobilizing people to volunteer in Alexandria.

Philanthropy
6
Columbia Pike Partnership Inc

Our mission is to foster a vibrant, safe, connected, and diverse Columbia Pike community to realize our vision of an authentic, exciting, and accessible Columbia Pike community where social, ethnic, and economic diversity is celebrated.

Community Improvement
7
District of Columbia Arts Center

The District of Columbia Arts Center serves the Washington DC area by presenting high caliber and challenging works. It encourages professionalism among artists by providing a forum for educational and cultural exchange. DCAC was founded…

Arts & Culture
8
Downtown Washington on the Waterfront

The mission of the WHDA is to recruit and support businesses in the Central Business District while building partnerships that encourage preservation and promote the Harbor District as an inclusive, professional,commercial,cultural and…

Community Improvement
9
Greater Alleghany Highlands Chamber of Commerce

Promote economic development and tourism in the Alleghany Highlands

10
Mount Vernon Downtown Association

The mission of the Mount Vernon Downtown Association is to cultivate a vibrant and prosperous downtown while honoring its historic character, to preserve and grow the place where community connection happens. Our vision is of a thriving…

Community Improvement
11
District of Columbia Daughters of the American Rev

To promote historic preservation, education and patriotism.

12
Economic Alliance of Greater Baltimore Foundation

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Alexandria Chamber of Commerce and the most unlike its peers is Tall Ship Providence Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 583 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
9/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Kearney & Company PC — $125,000 · Other+194 more — $3,310,546 · Other+194 moreDEL RAY BUSINESS ASSOCIATION — $95,765 · Community ImprovementSocial Responsibility Group — $50,000 · Civil RightsYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN WASHINGTON — $20,000 · Human ServicesHOPKINS HOUSE A CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND THEIR FAMILIES — $15,000 · Human ServicesTHE CHILD AND FAMILY NETWORK CENTERS INC — $15,000 · Education
Other$3,435,546Community Improvement$95,765Civil Rights$50,000Human Services$35,000Education$15,000

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetDEL RAY BUSINESS ASSOCIATION — $95,765 over 1y, 38% of budgetSocial Responsibility Group — $50,000 over 1y, 89% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER WASHINGTON AND AFFILIATE — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN WASHINGTON — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAlexandria Chamber of Commerce — $17,500 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetTHE CHILD AND FAMILY NETWORK CENTERS INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHOPKINS HOUSE A CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND THEIR FAMILIES — $15,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OLD TOWN BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds DEL RAY BUSINESS ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds Eisenhower Avenue Public-Private Partner
  • Who funds OLD TOWN NORTH ALLIANCE
  • Who funds Social Responsibility Group
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER WASHINGTON AND AFFILIATE

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Act for AlexandriaVA35.1× affinity19 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Act for Alexandria · Latino Economic Development Corporation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Alexandria Economic Development Partnership Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 583 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph