Skip to content
Alex and Agnes O McIntosh Fdn at a glance

· Private foundation

Alex and Agnes O McIntosh Fdn

Its FY2026 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$37k
Granted FY2026still arriving
5
Grants FY2026still arriving
3
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$35kArts & Culture$35kHuman Services$30kHousing & Shelter$23kHealth$20kCrime & Legal$20kEnvironment$15kEducation$15kOther$0
02FY2026 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k2 grants · $7k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $30k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$858k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$10,000
AGAPE NETWORK INC$10,000
ENCOUNTERS IN EXCELLENCE INC$10,000
PARKINSONS FOUNDATION INC$5,000
LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF MIAMI DADE COU$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%SUNRISE COMMUNITY INC: $10k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

41%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$103k · 5 repeat orgs$146k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +33% since the first grant, against +0% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2026, 4 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
14

Total granted

$103k
$119k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+0%

Still filing today

80%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 27% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $27k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25’26
EducationHealthCrime & LegalFood & NutritionCivil RightsHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TS
    THE SOCIETY OF ST ANDREW INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $35k · revenue -64%
  • CH
    CAMILLUS HOUSE INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $23k · revenue +42%
  • CB
    CHILDREN'S BEREAVEMENT CENTER INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $20k · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • CC
    Catholic Charities Legal Services Archdiocese of Miami Inc
    one grant, 2025 · $10k · revenue 0%
  • SC
    SUNRISE COMMUNITY INC
    one grant, 2025 · $10k · revenue 0%
  • RC
    RIVERSIDE CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue +43%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Florida Community Health Centers Inc

Florida community health centers, inc. (fchc) is a federally qualified health center serving medically needy populations in south florida, with an emphasis on serving rural and farm worker communities.

—
2
The Miami Foundation Inc

The miami foundation is building a greater miami where everyone can thrive. since 1967, the foundation has invested over $905m to strengthen our community in partnership with more than 1,000 fundholders and over 60,000 donors. by…

Philanthropy
3
Housing Opportunities Project for Excellence Inc

Hope incs mission is to fight housing discrimination in miami-dade and broward counties and to promote equal housing opportunities throughout the state of florida.

Housing & Shelter
4
Catholic Palliative Care Services Inc

Catholic palliative care services, inc. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of catholic hospice, inc. and under the sponsorship of the archdiocese of miami, provides responsive end-of-life care to patients and families in broward and dade…

—
5
The Hospice Institute of the Florida Suncoast Inc

Suncoast hospice institute is now inactive.

—
6
Communities in Schools of Miami Inc

The mission of communities in schools is to surround students with a community of support, empowering them to stay in school and achieve in life.

—
7
Miami-Dade Innovation Authority Inc

Miami-dade innovation authority bridges the gap between private innovators and the public sector to fast track innovation that improves quality of life for miamians.

Science & Tech
8
Florida Immigrant Coalition Inc

To focuses on public education and advocacy to generate public awareness of programs and services available to immigrants in Florida.

Civil Rights
9
SantaFe Healthcare Inc

The mission of santafe healthcare, inc. is to serve as the not-for-profit system parent for its family of not-for-profit, mission-driven, affiliate organizations. see schedule o for continuation of the organization's mission. santafe…

Health
10
Holy Cross Hospital Inc

We, holy cross hospital and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. holy cross hospital is a member of trinity health.

Health
11
Habitat for Humanity of Greater Palm Beach County

Seeking to put god's love into action, habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope.

—
12
Hospice of Palm Beach County Inc

The mission of hospice of palm beach county, inc. (hpbc) is to provide families with access to compassionate, expert and professional healthcare services in their time of need, throughout their lifespan. hpbc provides a coordinated,…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sunrise Community Inc; the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
11/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CAMILLUS HOUSE INC: $23,000 · OtherCAMILLUS HOUSE INCENCOUNTERS IN EXCELLENCE INC: $15,000 · OtherENCOUNTERS IN EXCELLENCE INCAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $10,000 · OtherAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETYCatholic Charities Legal Services Archdiocese of Miami Inc: $10,000 · OtherCatholic Charities Legal Services Archdiocese of Mi…WOLFSONIAN INC: $10,000 · OtherWOLFSONIAN INCEPILEPSY FLORIDA INC: $10,000 · OtherEPILEPSY FLORIDA INCTHE DEERING ESTATE FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · OtherMIAMI THEATER CENTER INC: $10,000 · OtherMIAMI THEATER CENTER INCDREAM IN GREEN INC: $10,000 · OtherDREAM IN GREEN INCHUMANE SOCIETY OF GREATER MIAMI-DADE FOR POCTA AAP: $5,000 · OtherSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $4,000 · Other+1 more: $2,000 · OtherTHE SOCIETY OF ST ANDREW INC: $35,000 · Food & NutritionTHE SOCIETY OF …CHILDREN'S BEREAVEMENT CENTER INC: $20,000 · EducationCHILDREN'S BERE…Teach for America Inc: $10,000 · EducationTeach for Ameri…MIAMI DADE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · EducationMIAMI DADE COLL…AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $10,000 · HealthAMERICAN CA…SOUTH FLORIDA PUBLIC MEDIA GROUP INC: $10,000 · HealthSOUTH FLORI…PARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · HealthPARKINSON'S…RIVERSIDE CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES INC: $10,000 · Crime & LegalRIVERSIDE…AGAPE NETWORK INC: $10,000 · Crime & LegalAGAPE NET…SUNRISE COMMUNITY INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesPEOPLE ACTING FOR COMMUNITY TOGETHER: $10,000 · Civil Rights
Other$114,000Food & Nutrition$35,000Education$35,000Health$25,000Crime & Legal$20,000Human Services$10,000Civil Rights$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE SOCIETY OF ST ANDREW INC: $35,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCAMILLUS HOUSE INC: $23,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S BEREAVEMENT CENTER INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetENCOUNTERS IN EXCELLENCE INC: $15,000 over 2y, 5.3% of budgetCatholic Charities Legal Services Archdiocese of Miami Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSUNRISE COMMUNITY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRIVERSIDE CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMIAMI THEATER CENTER INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetSOUTH FLORIDA PUBLIC MEDIA GROUP INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDREAM IN GREEN INC: $10,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetTeach for America Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEPILEPSY FLORIDA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMIAMI DADE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DEERING ESTATE FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Mightycause Charitabl…The Miami Foundation …The Batchelor Foundat…Allegany Franciscan M…The Kirk FoundationDunspaugh Dalton Foun…The Bank of America C…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Mightycause Charitable FoundationFL22.7× affinity10 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Mightycause Charitable Foundation · The Miami Foundation Inc · The Batchelor Foundation Inc · Allegany Franciscan Ministries Inc · The Kirk Foundation · Dunspaugh Dalton Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Alex and Agnes O McIntosh Fdn funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Alex and Agnes O McIntosh Fdn. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 58%
  • Riverside Christian Ministries Inc: 100% of income from government
  • Dream in Green Inc: 58% of income from government
  • Epilepsy Florida Inc: 8% of income from government
  • Camillus House Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Alex and Agnes O McIntosh Fdn?

Find your warmest path to Alex and Agnes O McIntosh Fdn through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Alex and Agnes O McIntosh Fdn’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home