Skip to content

· Public charity

Aleutian Pribilof Island Community Development Association APICDA

Economic Development and Financial Assistance for the benefit of various southwestern Alaska Villages.

$4.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
25
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$885k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Community Improvement$9.8MHuman Services$4.2MPublic Benefit$3.5MHousing & Shelter$525kEducation$388kEnvironment$305kFood & Nutrition$107kPublic Safety & Disaster$22kOther$0
02FY2024 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 25 grants below total $3,567,758, the rows itemized in this filing. The $4,130,191 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $562,433 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $9k
  • $10k–50k13 grants · $235k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $872k
  • $250k+5 grants · $2.5M
$25,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$198M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
City of St George$885,227
Native Village of Atka$500,000
Nelson Lagoon Tribal Council$388,931
Nikolski IRA$377,481
Akutan Corporation$300,000
False Pass Tribal Council$200,000
City of False Pass$166,221
Alaska Pacific University$154,519
City of Akutan$143,893
City of Atka$107,252
Axtam Corporation$100,000
Akutan Fisheries Association$25,000
Isanotski Corporation$25,000
Aleutians East Borough School$24,000
Unalaska Native Fishermans Association$20,640
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $3.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%Nelson Lagoon Tribal Council: $678k → 16%Nelson Lagoon Tribal Council: $392k → 16%Nelson Lagoon Tribal Council: $392k → 16%Nelson Lagoon Tribal Council: $389k → 16%Nelson Lagoon Tribal Council: $200k → 16%Nelson Lagoon Tribal Council: $101k → 16%Nelson Lagoon Tribal Council: $95k → 16%City of Atka: $467k → 10%City of Atka: $372k → 10%City of Atka: $107k → 10%City of Atka: $107k → 10%Aleutians East Borough School: $24k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$18M · 22 repeat orgs$996k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +97% since the first grant, against -50% for those funded once.

22 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
3

Total granted

$18M
$151k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+97%
-50%

Still filing today

23%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $846k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Community ImprovementHuman ServicesPublic BenefitArts & CultureEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AP
    Aleutian Pribilof Island Community Development Association APICDA
    7× · 2017–2024 · $3.3M · revenue +14%
  • AP
    Alaska Pacific University
    3× · 2022–2024 · $388k · revenue +38%
  • AP
    ALEUTIAN PRIBILOF ISLANDS ASSOCIATION INC
    6× · 2017–2024 · $204k · revenue +111%

Funded once

  • BP
    Bering Pacific Seafoods
    one grant, 2017 · $115k
  • AE
    ALEUTIANS EAST BOROUGH
    one grant, 2017 · $24k
  • AV
    ALASKA VETERANS MUSEUM
    one grant, 2017 · $12k · revenue -50%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Alaska Historical Publication Association
Education
2
The Aleut Foundation
Education
3
Museum of the Aleutians

The Museum of the Aleutians shall collect, preserve, and share the rich cultural legacy of the Aleutian Islands Region.

Arts & Culture
4
Aleutia Inc

Aleutia and its fishermen will effectively harvest the finest alaskan seafood available. aleutia will work on the behalf of all its members to further develop and promote the regional brand, aleutia, to facilitate extensive marketing…

Food & Nutrition
5
Alaska Rural Electric Cooperative Association Educational Foundation Inc
Environment
6
Inuit Circumpolar Council-Alaska

Icc alaska exists as the unified voice and collective spirit of alaskan inuit, to promote, protect and advance inuit culture and society.

Arts & Culture
7
Alaska Power Association

Promote and encourage cooperation among Alaska electric utilities and their customers while promoting the operation of electrical plants adequate for the needs of Alaskan consumers.

—
8
Alaska Association for Historic Pre

To educate the public about hisroric preservation and help restore and preserve historic sites.

Unclassified
9
Alaska Longline Fishermens Association

Alfa is an association of independent longline fishermen who are committed to continuing the sustainable harvest of sablefish, halibut, and groundfish, while supporting healthy marine ecosystems and strong coastal communities.

Community Improvement
10
Alaska Farmers Market Association

to promote, support and advocate for Alaska agriculture

Education
11
Alaska Police & Fire Chaplains

Offer assistance for emergency personnel.

—
12
Alaska Bering Sea Crabbers

To advocate for safe & sustainable management of the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands crab fisheries.

Employment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Aleutian Pribilof Islands Association Inc; the most unlike its peers is Atka Native Store. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

City of St George: $2,911,664 · OtherCity of St GeorgeCity of False Pass: $2,470,236 · OtherCity of False PassNikolski IRA: $2,445,349 · OtherNikolski IRACity of Akutan: $1,552,714 · OtherCity of AkutanAtka IRA Council: $1,272,167 · OtherAtka IRA CouncilAkutan Corporation: $1,100,000 · OtherAkutan CorporationATKA NATIVE STORE: $500,000 · Other+18 more: $2,558,419 · Other+18 moreAleutian Pribilof Island Community Development Association APICDA: $3,335,385 · Human ServicesAleutian Pribilof Is…Alaska Pacific University: $387,525 · EducationALEUTIAN PRIBILOF ISLANDS ASSOCIATION INC: $204,008 · Community ImprovementSEASHARE: $33,333 · Community ImprovementCOAST GUARD FOUNDATION INC: $21,500 · Public BenefitALASKA VETERANS MUSEUM: $12,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$14,810,549Human Services$3,335,385Education$387,525Community Improvement$237,341Public Benefit$21,500Arts & Culture$12,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAleutian Pribilof Island Community Development Association APICDA: $3,335,385 over 7y, 8.2% of budgetATKA NATIVE STORE: $500,000 over 1y, 99% of budgetAlaska Pacific University: $387,525 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetALEUTIAN PRIBILOF ISLANDS ASSOCIATION INC: $204,008 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetSEASHARE: $33,333 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCOAST GUARD FOUNDATION INC: $21,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetALASKA VETERANS MUSEUM: $12,000 over 1y, 7.7% of budgetUnalaska Port of Dutch Harbor: $9,128 over 1y, 1.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Aleutian Pribilof Island Community Development Association APICDA ↗
  • Who funds ATKA NATIVE STORE ↗
  • Who funds Alaska Pacific University ↗
  • Who funds ALEUTIAN PRIBILOF ISLANDS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SEASHARE ↗
  • Who funds COAST GUARD FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ALASKA VETERANS MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds Unalaska Port of Dutch Harbor ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Unangax Heritage Association IncAK17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 5 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Unangax Heritage Association Inc · The Aleut Foundation · Aleutian Pribilof Islands Association Inc · Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium · Rasmuson Foundation · The Alaska Community Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Aleutian Pribilof Island Community Development Association APICDA funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Aleutian Pribilof Island Community Development Association APICDA. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Aleutian Pribilof Island Community Development Association APICDA?

    Find your warmest path to Aleutian Pribilof Island Community Development Association APICDA through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Aleutian Pribilof Island Community Development Association APICDA’s filings →

    More from the funding graph