· Public charity
Aleutian Pribilof Island Community Development Association APICDA
Economic Development and Financial Assistance for the benefit of various southwestern Alaska Villages.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 79% of Aleutian Pribilof Island Community Development Association APICDA’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 25 grants below total $3,567,758 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $4,130,191 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $562,433 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $9k
- $10k–50k13 grants · $235k
- $50k–250k6 grants · $872k
- $250k+5 grants · $2.5M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| City of St George | $885,227 |
| Native Village of Atka | $500,000 |
| Nelson Lagoon Tribal Council | $388,931 |
| Nikolski IRA | $377,481 |
| Akutan Corporation | $300,000 |
| False Pass Tribal Council | $200,000 |
| City of False Pass | $166,221 |
| Alaska Pacific University | $154,519 |
| City of Akutan | $143,893 |
| City of Atka | $107,252 |
| Axtam Corporation | $100,000 |
| Akutan Fisheries Association | $25,000 |
| Isanotski Corporation | $25,000 |
| Aleutians East Borough School | $24,000 |
| Unalaska Native Fishermans Association | $20,640 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $3.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +97% since the first grant, against -50% for the ones you funded once.
22 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $846k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- APAleutian Pribilof Island Community Development Association APICDA7× · 2017–2024 · $3.3M · revenue +14%
- APAlaska Pacific University3× · 2022–2024 · $388k · revenue +38%
- APALEUTIAN PRIBILOF ISLANDS ASSOCIATION INC6× · 2017–2024 · $204k · revenue +111%
Funded once
- BPBering Pacific Seafoodsone grant, 2017 · $115k
- AEALEUTIANS EAST BOROUGHone grant, 2017 · $24k
- AVALASKA VETERANS MUSEUMone grant, 2017 · $12k · revenue -50%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The Museum of the Aleutians shall collect, preserve, and share the rich cultural legacy of the Aleutian Islands Region.
Aleutia and its fishermen will effectively harvest the finest alaskan seafood available. aleutia will work on the behalf of all its members to further develop and promote the regional brand, aleutia, to facilitate extensive marketing…
Icc alaska exists as the unified voice and collective spirit of alaskan inuit, to promote, protect and advance inuit culture and society.
Promote and encourage cooperation among Alaska electric utilities and their customers while promoting the operation of electrical plants adequate for the needs of Alaskan consumers.
To educate the public about hisroric preservation and help restore and preserve historic sites.
Alfa is an association of independent longline fishermen who are committed to continuing the sustainable harvest of sablefish, halibut, and groundfish, while supporting healthy marine ecosystems and strong coastal communities.
to promote, support and advocate for Alaska agriculture
Offer assistance for emergency personnel.
To advocate for safe & sustainable management of the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands crab fisheries.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Aleutian Pribilof Islands Association Inc and the most unlike its peers is Atka Native Store. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Aleutian Pribilof Island Community Development Association APICDA ↗
- Who funds ATKA NATIVE STORE ↗
- Who funds Alaska Pacific University ↗
- Who funds ALEUTIAN PRIBILOF ISLANDS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds SEASHARE ↗
- Who funds COAST GUARD FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ALASKA VETERANS MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds Unalaska Port of Dutch Harbor ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Unangax Heritage Association Inc · The Aleut Foundation · Aleutian Pribilof Islands Association Inc · Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium · Rasmuson Foundation · The Alaska Community Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Aleutian Pribilof Island Community Development Association APICDA funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Aleutian Pribilof Island Community Development Association APICDA?
Find your warmest path to Aleutian Pribilof Island Community Development Association APICDA through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.