· Public charity
Alegent Creighton Health
As an affiliate of commonspirit health, we make the healing presence of god known in our world by improving the health of the people we serve, especially those who are vulnerable, while we advance social justice for all.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 10 grants below total $1,502,881 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,573,326 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $70,445 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k8 grants · $133k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
- $250k+1 grant · $1.3M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CHI HEALTH FOUNDATION | $1,320,381 |
| OMAHA ARCHIOCESAN EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC | $50,000 |
| RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES IN OMAHA | $20,000 |
| RISE ACADEMY | $20,000 |
| WHISPERING ROOTS INC | $20,000 |
| TOGETHER INC OF METROPOLITAN OMAHA | $20,000 |
| SAVING GRACE PERISHABLE FOOD RESCUE | $20,000 |
| THE CREW CENTER | $12,500 |
| BUFFALO COUNTY COMMUNITY HEALTH PARTNERS INC | $10,000 |
| UNITED WAY OF THE MIDLANDS | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY25–25, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +34% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
9 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $113k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CHCHI HEALTH FOUNDATION9× · 2017–2025 · $3.2M · revenue +146%
- BCBUFFALO COUNTY COMMUNITY HEALTH PARTNERS INC3× · 2017–2025 · $80k · revenue +40%
- UWUNITED WAY OF THE MIDLANDS4× · 2021–2025 · $48k · revenue +28%
Funded once
- AHALEGENT HEALTH-IMMANUEL MEDICAL CENTERone grant, 2017 · $121k · revenue +11%
- CMCOMUNIDAD MAYA PIXAN IXIMone grant, 2024 · $50k · revenue 0%
- MCMOSAIC COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENTone grant, 2024 · $44k · revenue 0%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.
One omaha empowers people where they live with education, training, and engagement to develop thriving neighborhoods.
Mission: to inspire and nurture a healthy community by building a local, sustainable, and organic food economy in a vibrant experiential marketplace.vision: to be a nationally recognized marketplace model that connects, educates, and…
Mn community measurement empowers stakeholders with meaningful information to drive improvement.
Midwest dairy works with others to give consumers an excellent dairy experience increasing sales, fostering innovation, and inspiring consumer confidence of dairy products and practices.
Our mission is to inspire the iowa city area to be greater by: 1) elevating business, 2) investing in strategic initiatives, and 3) advocating for the economic resiliency of the greater community.
Heartland community health network exists to support and strengthen its federally qualified health center members through collaboration, information-sharing and integration of administrative, fiscal and clinical operations.
To increase business, employment, and investment in the greater omaha area.
Mission: community action of nebraska strives to alleviate poverty through enhancing program development, providing technical assistance, and advocating public policy to support all community action agencies in nebraska.
Assisting the community mental health boards of michigan in developing methods for mental health planning, care and treatment.
Creating powerful advocacy to enhance economic vitality in the minneapolis-st. paul region.
Community health care provides the communities we serve with excellence in patient-centered medical, dental, and behavioral health care that is compassionate, affordable, and accessible.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chi Health Foundation and the most unlike its peers is The Crew Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CHI HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ALEGENT HEALTH-IMMANUEL MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds BUFFALO COUNTY COMMUNITY HEALTH PARTNERS INC ↗
- Who funds COMUNIDAD MAYA PIXAN IXIM ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF THE MIDLANDS ↗
- Who funds MOSAIC COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ↗
- Who funds CLINIC WITH A HEART INC ↗
- Who funds AFRICAN AMERICAN EMPOWERMENT NETWORK IN ↗
- Who funds SAVING GRACE PERISHABLE FOOD RESCUE INC ↗
- Who funds WHISPERING ROOTS INC ↗
- Who funds RISE ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds TOGETHER INC OF METROPOLITAN OMAHA ↗
- Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES IN OMAHA INC ↗
- Who funds NEBRASKA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE & INDUSTRY ↗
- Who funds THE CREW CENTER ↗
- Who funds MATURA ACTION CORPORATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Sherwood Foundation · Weitz Family Foundation · The Lozier Foundation · Alegent Health - Bergan Mercy Health System · Charles E Lakin Foundation Inc · Leland J & Dorothy H Olson Charitable Foundation · Immanuel Community Vision Foundation · Union Pacific Foundation · Suzanne & Walter Scott Foundation · Mutual of Omaha Foundation · United Way of the Midlands · Peter Kiewit Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Alegent Creighton Health funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.