Skip to content

· Private foundation

Alec and Donna Belingloph Charitable Trust

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$198k
Granted FY2026still arriving
11
Grants FY2026still arriving
5
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$488kRecreation & Sports$240kAnimals$202kHuman Services$191kFood & Nutrition$175kPublic Benefit$135kEducation$97kPhilanthropy$85kOther$0
02FY2026 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k3 grants · $8k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $190k
$25,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$3.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NATIONAL DOWN SYNDROME SOCIETY$35,000
NATIONAL HUMANE SOCIETY$35,000
HARVESTERS FOOD NETWORK$25,000
MO SPECIAL OLYMPICS$25,000
JEWISH FED OF GREATER KC$25,000
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT$25,000
GVMH FOUNDATION$10,000
PROJECT CHRISTMAS$10,000
BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA$5,000
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$2,176
MEDICAL MISSIONS FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–26, $151k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WOUNDED WARRIORS PROJECT: $35k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIORS PROJECT: $35k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIORS PROJECT: $30k → 14%SAFEHOME: $750 → 5%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $25k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIORS PROJECT: $20k → 14%SHADOW BUDDIES FDN: $3k → 5%SHADOW BUDDIES FDN: $3k → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IL
WI
NY
IN
PA
CO
MO
VA
MD
KS
TN
NC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 25 repeat orgs$511k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +31% since the first grant, against +24% for those funded once.

25 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2026, 19 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
40

Total granted

$1.4M
$381k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+24%

Still filing today

40%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 34% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $130k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’21’22’23’24’25’26
HealthHuman ServicesAnimalsEducationPublic BenefitCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC
    5× · 2017–2026 · $145k · revenue +90%
  • HF
    HEAD FOR THE CURE FOUNDATION
    4× · 2018–2024 · $53k · revenue +38%
  • HS
    HUMANE SOCIETY OF GREATER KC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $32k · revenue +56%

Funded once

  • JF
    JEWISH FEDERATION F GREAKE KC
    one grant, 2021 · $55k
  • AF
    AHEAD FUND
    one grant, 2022 · $35k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $30k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Kanza Mental Health and Guidance Center Inc

Offer hope to build a better tomorrow through mental health services.

Health
2
National Committee for Quality Assurance

Our mission: to improve the quality of health care.our vision: better health care. better choices. better health.

Health
3
Jefferson Regional Foundation

The mission of the foundation is to improve the health and well-being of the communities served by jefferson hospital through engagement, community-driven research and grantmaking. there are three grantmaking priorities focused on the…

Health
4
Oncology and Kids Inc

To help kids and families heal the emotional scars of childhood cancer and learn to thrive.

Human Services
5
Noah's Bandage Project

To end childhood cancer through awareness, support and the gift of hope. we do this through funding pediatric cancer research grants and collecting & distributing cool, fun bandages all over the world.

Health
6
Kansas City Pet Project

Leading the way in creating a compassionate, safe community for pets and people through progressive lifesaving programs and services, community resources, and educational opportunities.

Animals
7
Kidspeace National Centers for Kids in Crisis

Kidspeace, founded in 1882, is a healthcare nonprofit that is dedicated to providing hope, help, and healing to children, adults, and those who love them.continued on schedule o.with 40 offices and facilities across seven states, this…

Health
8
National Comprehensive Cancer Network

To define and advance quality, effective, equitable, and accessible cancer care and prevention so all people can live better lives.

Health
9
United Children's Services of Bennington County Inc

Children's services

Human Services
10
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
11
The Bert Nash Community Mental Health Center Inc

To advance the health of the douglas county community through comprehensive behavioral health services responsive to evolving needs and changing environments.

Health
12
St Marys Healthcare System for Children Inc

To serve as the sole member of the various health care and supporting organizations that comprise st. mary's healthcare system for children

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Safehome Inc; the most unlike its peers is National Humane Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 72 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/23
Grantees still filing
12/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SPECIAL OLYMPICS MISSOURI INC: $235,000 · OtherSPECIAL OLYMPICS MISSOURI INCTHE HUMANE SOCIETY OF GREATER KANSA: $160,000 · OtherTHE HUMANE SOCIETY OF GREATER KANSAJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER KC: $155,000 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER KCHARVESTER'S FOOD NETWORK: $145,000 · OtherHARVESTER'S FOOD NETWORKWARRIOR BONFIRE PROGRAM: $135,000 · OtherWARRIOR BONFIRE PROGRAMNATIONAL DOWN SYNDROME SOCIETY: $70,000 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATION F GREAKE KC: $55,000 · Other+51 more: $661,508 · Other+51 moreWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $145,000 · Human Services+2 more: $5,750 · Human ServicesNational Humane Society: $35,000 · AnimalsHUMANE SOCIETY OF GREATER KC: $32,000 · AnimalsHEAD FOR THE CURE FOUNDATION: $52,550 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $2,500 · HealthBIND- Brain Injury Network of Dallas: $2,000 · Health+2 more: $2,200 · HealthJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER KANSAS CITY: $30,000 · PhilanthropyHENRY COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · PhilanthropyHARVESTERS - THE COMMUNITY FOOD NETWORK: $30,000 · Food & NutritionTHE CHILDREN'S PLACE INC: $15,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$1,616,508Human Services$150,750Animals$67,000Health$59,250Philanthropy$35,000Food & Nutrition$30,000Crime & Legal$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS MISSOURI INC: $235,000 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $145,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHEAD FOR THE CURE FOUNDATION: $52,550 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF GREATER KC: $32,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetHEART OF AMERICA COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $30,110 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetHARVESTERS - THE COMMUNITY FOOD NETWORK: $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S PLACE INC: $15,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetARTS & RECREATION FOUNDATION OF OVERLAND: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSHADOW BUDDIES FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetHENRY COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTALK 2 ME: $2,500 over 1y, 5.6% of budgetBSDS INC BROOKSIDE CHARTER SCHOOL: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRonald McDonald House Global: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAFEHOME INC: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS MISSOURI INC ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds HEAD FOR THE CURE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds National Humane Society ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL DOWN SYNDROME SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF GREATER KC ↗
  • Who funds HEART OF AMERICA COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER KANSAS CITY ↗
  • Who funds HARVESTERS - THE COMMUNITY FOOD NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDICAL MISSIONS FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

John J Sullivan Jr Foundation John Houlehan & Mark Henke-TrusteesKS22× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: John J Sullivan Jr Foundation John Houlehan & Mark Henke-Trustees · Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · Kompass Kapital Foundation · The Francis Family Foundation · Hallmark Corporate Foundation · Servant Foundation · Ima Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Alec and Donna Belingloph Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Alec and Donna Belingloph Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Alec and Donna Belingloph Charitable Trust?

Find your warmest path to Alec and Donna Belingloph Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 72 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Alec and Donna Belingloph’s filings →

More from the funding graph