· Private foundation
Aldo K Germann Trust Ti-Trust Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CHADDOCK CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION | $7,000 |
| ST LUKE'S HOSPITAL | $6,000 |
| CLARENDON HILLS PUBLIC LIBRARY | $2,000 |
| NORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK | $2,000 |
| HINSDALE HUMANE SOCIETY | $2,000 |
| BLESSING FOUNDATION INC | $1,147 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $49k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +67% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
12 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CCCHADDOCK CHILDRENS FOUNDATION8× · 2017–2025 · $48k · revenue +479%
- NINORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK9× · 2017–2025 · $13k · revenue +43%
- QSQUINCY SOCIETY OF FINE ARTS3× · 2017–2019 · $8k · revenue +67%
Funded once
- SUSALEM-IN-BALLWIN UNITED METHODISTone grant, 2017 · $2k
- SAST ANDREWS RESOURCES FOR SENIORSone grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue 0%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To give members the ability to control their financial destiny by providing members with the means to satisfy their needs for financial services in a comfortable family-like environment. in doing so, the credit union strives to maintain…
The credit union provides security of savings and selected financial services to its members in a convenient, responsive manner, at competitive rates, while maintaining financial stability and capital growth within the association.
To support and promote mental health services in the four counties of carroll, lee, ogle, and whiteside.
The health of the public, to promote the art and science of dentistry and to represent the interest of the members of the profession and the public which it serves.
It is the mission of sinnissippi centers, inc. to provide quality, coordinated and responsive behavioral healthcare services to individuals, families and the communities we serve.
To collect and preserve the history of naperville, illinois, for the present and future, sharing it with the community through preservation, programming, exhibition, and educational experiences. naper settlement seeks to be a community…
To lead in advocacy and education for our members in illinois. services include annual convention, educational seminars, various industry newsletters, and other services.
To advocate for and support hospitals and health systems as they serve patients and communities in illinois.
Improve oral health by providing funds for dental education and access to care programs
To nourish scottish identity through service, fellowship, and celebration of scottish culture.
Care to terminal patients/families
To improve the quality of life for seniors in need through reliable and compassionate care.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chaddock Childrens Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Clarendon Hills Historical Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CHADDOCK CHILDRENS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds QUINCY SOCIETY OF FINE ARTS ↗
- Who funds THE BLESSING FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds HINSDALE HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds CLARENDON HILLS HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds SHOW-ME INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds ST ANDREWS RESOURCES FOR SENIORS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Aldo K Germann Trust Ti-Trust Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.