Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Albert Lepage Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.3M
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$500k
Largest
01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$11MPhilanthropy$2.9MHealth$2.3MRecreation & Sports$475kAnimals$150kArts & Culture$132kEnvironment$62kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k6 grants · $90k
  • $250k+5 grants · $2.2M
$30,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$158k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TULANE UNIVERSITY$500,000
HEBRON ACADEMY$500,000
VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY$500,000
BESSEMER NATIONAL GIFT FUND$450,000
ST MARY'S HEALTH SYSTEM$250,000
HUMANE SOCIETY OF GREATER MIAMI NORTH$30,000
HUMANE SOCIETY OF BROWARD COUNTY$15,000
GREATER ANDROSCOGGIN HUMANE SOCIETY$15,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
DANCERS RESPONDING TO AIDS$10,000
FIRE ISLAND PINES ARTS PROJECT (FIPAP)$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 98% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY: $503k → 10%DOMINICAN UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA: $150k → 8%PINES CARE CENTER: $40k → 7%HUMANE SOCIETY OF BROWARD COUNTY: $15k → 13%HUMANE SOCIETY OF GREATER MIAMI NORTH: $30k → 15%UNITED STATE OLYMPIC AND PARALYMPIC FOUNDATION: $138k → 9%BESSEMER NATIONAL GIFT FUND: $450k → 8%TULANE UNIVERSITY: $600k → 23%HEBRON ACADEMY: $600k → 13%GREATER ANDROSCOGGIN HUMANE SOCIETY: $15k → 13%VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY: $500k → 10%PINES FOUNDATION: $25k → 7%HUMANE SOCIETY OF BROWARD COUNTY: $15k → 13%HUMANE SOCIETY OF GREATER MIAMI NORTH: $15k → 15%UNITED STATE OLYMPIC AND PARALYMPIC FOUNDATION: $119k → 9%BESSEMER NATIONAL GIFT FUND: $450k → 8%TULANE UNIVERSITY: $500k → 23%HEBRON ACADEMY: $600k → 13%VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY: $350k → 10%PINES CARE CENTER: $25k → 7%UNITED STATE OLYMPIC AND PARALYMPIC FOUNDATION: $119k → 9%BESSEMER NATIONAL GIFT FUND: $450k → 8%TULANE UNIVERSITY: $500k → 23%HEBRON ACADEMY: $501k → 13%VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY: $350k → 10%PINES FOUNDATION: $25k → 7%UNITED STATE OLYMPIC AND PARALYMPIC FOUNDATION: $100k → 9%BESSEMER NATIONAL GIFT FUND: $450k → 8%TULANE UNIVERSITY: $500k → 23%HEBRON ACADEMY: $500k → 13%VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY: $250k → 10%BESSEMER NATIONAL GIFT FUND: $450k → 8%TULANE UNIVERSITY: $450k → 23%HEBRON ACADEMY: $500k → 13%VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY: $250k → 10%BESSEMER NATIONAL GIFT FUND: $324k → 8%TULANE UNIVERSITY: $350k → 23%HEBRON ACADEMY: $300k → 13%VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY: $250k → 10%BESSEMER NATIONAL GIFT FUND: $298k → 8%TULANE UNIVERSITY: $250k → 23%HEBRON ACADEMY: $250k → 13%VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY: $250k → 10%TULANE UNIVERSITY - A B FREEMAN SCHOOL OF BUSINESS: $250k → 23%HEBRON ACADEMY: $250k → 13%VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY: $250k → 10%TULANE UNIVERSITY: $250k → 23%HEBRON ACADEMY: $250k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
NY
PA
NJ
CA
CO
LA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$14M · 13 repeat orgs$150k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +50% since the first grant, against -1% for the ones you funded once.

13 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
1

Total granted

$14M
$150k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
-1%

Still filing today

69%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthAnimalsRecreation & SportsCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TA
    THE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND
    9× · 2017–2025 · $3.6M · revenue +72%
  • VU
    VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $3.0M · revenue +50%
  • US
    UNITED STATES OLYMPIC AND PARALYMPIC FOUNDATION
    4× · 2018–2021 · $475k · revenue +78%

Funded once

  • DU
    DOMINICAN UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
    one grant, 2022 · $150k · revenue -1%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
2
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
3
Stony Brook Orthopedic Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
4
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
5
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
6
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
7
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

8
University of Maryland Obstetrical Andgynecological Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

9
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
University of Maryland Surgical Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
11
University of Maryland Oncology Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
12
University of Maryland Physicians Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Bessemer Giving Fund and the most unlike its peers is Pines Care Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
6/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Hebron Academy Incorporated — $3,751,249 · EducationHebron Academy IncorporatedTHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND — $3,650,000 · EducationTHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUNDVILLANOVA UNIVERSITY — $2,953,245 · EducationVILLANOVA UNIVERSITY+1 more — $150,000 · EducationTHE BESSEMER GIVING FUND — $2,871,510 · PhilanthropyTHE BESSEMER GIVING…St Mary's Health System — $2,260,767 · HealthSt Mary's Healt…+1 more — $65,000 · HealthUNITED STATES OLYMPIC AND PARALYMPIC FOUNDATION — $475,425 · Recreation & SportsDANCERS RESPONDING TO AIDS — $82,000 · OtherHUMANE SOCIETY OF GREATER MIAMI NORTH — $60,000 · OtherFIRE ISLAND PINES ARTS PROJECT (FIPAP) — $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $30,000 · OtherGREATER ANDROSCOGGIN HUMANE SOCIETY — $45,000 · AnimalsHUMANE SOCIETY OF BROWARD COUNTY INC — $45,000 · AnimalsTHE PINES FOUNDATION INC — $62,183 · Community Improvement
Education$10,504,494Philanthropy$2,871,510Health$2,325,767Recreation & Sports$475,425Other$222,000Animals$90,000Community Improvement$62,183

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHebron Academy Incorporated — $3,751,249 over 9y, 3.9% of budgetTHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND — $3,650,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetVILLANOVA UNIVERSITY — $2,953,245 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BESSEMER GIVING FUND — $2,871,510 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetSt Mary's Health System — $2,260,767 over 9y, 7.8% of budgetUNITED STATES OLYMPIC AND PARALYMPIC FOUNDATION — $475,425 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetDOMINICAN UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA — $150,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPINES CARE CENTER INC — $65,000 over 2y, 36% of budgetTHE PINES FOUNDATION INC — $62,183 over 3y, 6.9% of budgetGREATER ANDROSCOGGIN HUMANE SOCIETY — $45,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF BROWARD COUNTY INC — $45,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Hebron Academy Incorporated
  • Who funds THE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND
  • Who funds VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds THE BESSEMER GIVING FUND
  • Who funds St Mary's Health System
  • Who funds UNITED STATES OLYMPIC AND PARALYMPIC FOUNDATION
  • Who funds DOMINICAN UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
  • Who funds PINES CARE CENTER INC
  • Who funds THE PINES FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds GREATER ANDROSCOGGIN HUMANE SOCIETY
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF BROWARD COUNTY INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Maine Community Foundation IncME13.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Maine Community Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Albert Lepage Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Albert Lepage Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Albert Lepage Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph