Skip to content

· Public charity

Alabama Audubon

ALABAMA AUDUBON's mission is to promote conservation and a greater knowledge of birds, their habitats, and the natural world.

$18k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$32kEnvironment$21kAnimals$15kEmployment$2kArts & Culture$500
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 1 grants below total $5,494, the rows itemized in this filing. The $17,996 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $12,502 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$5,494
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AL A&M UNIVERSITY$5,494
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 84% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%Athens Elementary School: $600 → 10%AL A&M UNIVERSITY: $5k → 11%Riverside Beautification Organization: $500 → 13%Wetland Environmental Learning Projects Inc: $500 → 13%Auburn University: $2k → 15%Red Mountain Community School: $500 → 16%Oakville Indian Mounds Education Center: $500 → 16%Alabama 4-H Walker County: $500 → 17%Westlawn Middle School: $900 → 17%Dothan Area Botanical Gardens: $2k → 17%Lynn Elementary School: $500 → 18%Auburn University at Montgomery Dept of Biology & Evironmental Science: $1k → 18%Jacksonville State University: $2k → 19%Conservation Alabama: $2k → 19%University of West Alabama: $4k → 31%University of Mississippi: $2k → 18%University of Southern Mississippi: $1k → 22%Mississippi State University: $2k → 24%Chapman Elementary School: $1k → 11%Waterworks Center for Environmental Education: $470 → 13%Auburn University: $2k → 15%Avondale School: $500 → 16%Tuscaloosa Magnet Schools: $800 → 17%Hidden Lake Elementary: $550 → 17%Auburn University at Montgomery: $500 → 18%JE Turner Elementary School: $500 → 19%Hoover High School: $500 → 7%Auburn University: $500 → 15%Cahaba Elementary School: $400 → 16%Oakdale Elementary School: $750 → 17%University of South Alabama: $2k → 19%Elvin Hill Elementary School: $600 → 7%University of Alabama: $7k → 16%Sassafras Center: $500 → 17%University of South Alabama: $1k → 19%University of Alabama Biology Department: $6k → 16%University of Alabama: $2k → 17%University of Alabama at Birmingham Biology Department: $1k → 16%University of Alabama: $2k → 17%Birmingham Southern College: $1k → 16%University of Alabama: $1k → 17%Erwin Intermediate School: $500 → 16%Martha Gaskins Elementary School: $500 → 16%Jones Valley Teaching Farm: $2k → 16%Pleasant Grove High School: $470 → 16%Kermit Johnson Elementary School: $430 → 16%Clay-Chalkville High School: $400 → 16%Jones Valley Teaching Farm: $1k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 10% of Alabama Audubon’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 94% of the giving stays in AL; by stated purpose, 98%.

Alabama Audubonlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

27%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$19k · 4 repeat orgs$52k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
39

Total granted

$19k
$46k

Still filing today

0%
15%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’25
EnvironmentEmploymentScience & TechEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BO
    BOARD OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA
    3× · 2017–2021 · $12k
  • AU
    AUBURN UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2017–2021 · $5k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH ALABAMA
    3× · 2018–2021 · $3k

Funded once

  • UO
    University of Alabama Biology Department
    one grant, 2020 · $6k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • UO
    University of West Alabama
    2× · 2018–2020 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Conservation Al Foundation Inc

To build the ability of Alabama citizens and organizations to promote conservation through government and civic action.

Education
2
Alabama Forest Land Trust Inc

The Organization focuses on providing services via conservation easements, administration of various grants, educational outreach and planning.

—
3
Alabama a&M University Foundation

The Alabama A&M University Foundation was established to receive, hold, invest, manage, use, and administer property of all kinds, whether given absolutely or in trust, for the benefit of Alabama A&M University and its educational,…

—
4
Alabama Association of Resource Conservation and Development Councils

Coordinate rc&d activity in alabama

Environment
5
Alabama Forestry Foundation

The alabama forestry association works to promote good stewardship of our renewable forest resources for the benefit of society, our members, and the forest products industry.

Environment
6
Alabama Forestry Association Inc

Promote forest industry & forest products

—
7
The University Foundation

The university foundation is organized to assist and aid the board of trustees of the university of alabama in fulfilling its educational, research, and public service programs and activities.

—
8
Alabama Rivers Alliance Inc

Alabama Rivers Alliance is a statewide network of groups working to protect and restore all of Alabama's water resources through building partnerships, empowering citizens, and advocating for sound water policy and its enforcement.

Environment
9
South Al Botanical and Horticultural Society

The society's purpose is to provide information to the public-at-large on the development of plants by means of herbariums, exhibits, lectures, and publications; and develop and maintain a nature area and botanical gardens.

Environment
10
The Land Trust of North Alabama Inc

The land trust leads regional and community collaborations that plan, preserve and provide stewardship for green space in north alabama. our mission is to preserve and protect north alabama's scenic, historic, and ecological resources…

Environment
11
Alabama Restaurant & Hospitality Association Foundation
—
12
Alabama Rural Electric Association of Cooperatives

A statewide trade association which serves as a resource through which its electric cooperative members are provided services for the continuation and advancement of the rural electrification program in Alabama.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Alabama 4-H Club Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Dothan Botanical Gardens Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BOARD OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA: $11,921 · OtherBOARD OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMAUniversity of Alabama Biology Department: $5,500 · OtherUniversity of Alabama Biology DepartmentUNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM: $5,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAMAUBURN UNIVERSITY: $4,565 · OtherAUBURN UNIVERSITYUniversity of West Alabama: $4,000 · OtherUniversity of West AlabamaAlabama A & M University: $2,500 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF SOUTH ALABAMA: $2,500 · Other+32 more: $23,795 · Other+32 moreAAMU-RISE FOUNDATION: $5,494 · Science & TechDOTHAN BOTANICAL GARDENS INC: $2,000 · EnvironmentConservation Alabama: $1,500 · EnvironmentJONES VALLEY URBAN FARM: $2,000 · EmploymentRED MOUNTAIN COMMUNITY SCHOOL: $500 · Education
Other$59,781Science & Tech$5,494Environment$3,500Employment$2,000Education$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAAMU-RISE FOUNDATION: $5,494 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetJONES VALLEY URBAN FARM: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetDOTHAN BOTANICAL GARDENS INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetConservation Alabama: $1,500 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetBIRMINGHAM-SOUTHERN COLLEGE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ALABAMA 4-H CLUB FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AAMU-RISE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds JONES VALLEY URBAN FARM ↗
  • Who funds DOTHAN BOTANICAL GARDENS INC ↗
  • Who funds Conservation Alabama ↗
  • Who funds BIRMINGHAM-SOUTHERN COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds THE ALABAMA 4-H CLUB FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds RED MOUNTAIN COMMUNITY SCHOOL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Alabama Power Foundation IncAL15.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Alabama Power Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation of Greater Birmingham · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Alabama Audubon funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Alabama Audubon. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Alabama Audubon’s filings →

    More from the funding graph