Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Airbnborg Inc

Airbnb.org's mission is to unlock the power of sharing space, resources and support in times of need.

$7.6M
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$500k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

International$24MHuman Services$4.8MPublic Safety & Disaster$4.4MHousing & Shelter$3.1MPhilanthropy$690kReligion$550k
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 8 grants below total $3,105,571 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $7,565,587 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $4,460,016 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
  • $250k+7 grants · $3.0M
$450,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$24M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHURCH WORLD SERVICE INC$500,000
INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE INC$500,000
HIAS INC$500,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES USA$450,000
HAITIAN BRIDGE ALLIANCE$400,000
ORAM - ORGANIZATION FOR REFUGE ASYLUM & MIGRATION$350,000
UNITED STATES ASSOCIATION FOR UNHCR$305,571
ROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC$100,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $4.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 28% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%AFGHAN COALITION: $70k → 10%HAITIAN BRIDGE ALLIANCE: $400k → 11%CHOOSE LOVE INC: $200k → 17%CATHOLIC CHARITIES USA: $1.4M → 9%NEW ORLEANS FAMILY JUSTICE CENTER: $100k → 23%AFGHAN COALITION: $43k → 10%ETHIOPIAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL INC: $500k → 7%CATHOLIC CHARITIES USA: $600k → 9%TOGETHER & FREE INC: $300k → 17%ETHIOPIAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL INC: $401k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
NY
OR
IN
CA
CO
VA
MD
DC
HI
LA
GA

Grants abroad, by region — $1.5M on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 4 regions, $1.2M to organizations and $251k to individuals. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$820k · 56% · 2 grants · 25 people

Stated purpose: TEMPORARY HOUSING AFTER NATURAL OR CIVIL DISASTERS

North America (Canada and Mexico)$431k · 30% · 1 grant · 183 people

Stated purpose: TEMPORARY HOUSING AFTER NATURAL OR CIVIL DISASTERS

East Asia and the Pacific$114k · 8% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: TEMPORARY HOUSING AFTER NATURAL OR CIVIL DISASTERS

South America$90k · 6% · 1 grant · 356 people

Stated purpose: TEMPORARY HOUSING AFTER NATURAL OR CIVIL DISASTERS

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$33M · 20 repeat orgs$2.6M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +35% since the first grant, against +16% for the ones you funded once.

20 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
13

Total granted

$33M
$2.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+16%

Still filing today

95%
85%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $400k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalHuman ServicesPublic Safety & DisasterScience & TechEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HI
    HIAS INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $7.9M · revenue +85%
  • IR
    International Rescue Committee INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $6.3M · revenue +38%
  • CW
    CHURCH WORLD SERVICE INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $4.0M · revenue +278%

Funded once

  • LI
    LUTHERAN IMMIGRATION & REFUGEE SERVICE INC DBA GLOBAL REFUGEgraduated
    2× · 2021–2022 · $587k · revenue +165%
  • UC
    US COMMITTEE FOR REFUGEES AND IMMIGRANTS INCgraduated
    2× · 2021–2022 · $411k · revenue +223%
  • TF
    TOGETHER & FREE INC
    one grant, 2023 · $300k · revenue +2% · 64% of their budget

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
2
Women's Refugee Commission Inc

To improve the lives and protect the rights of women, children and youth displaced by conflict and crisis. the women's refugee commission envisions a world in which refugees are safe, healthy and reliant and seeks to drive change in…

Human Services
3
Refugee Protection International Inc

Rpi's mission is to partner with local non-gov organizations and others to strengthen protection and self-reliance among refugees and internally displaced persons near conflict zones.

International
4
The International Refugee Rights Initiative

To enhance the protection of rights of the displaced worldwide by the provision of advice and assistance on the application of international law, the conducting of research on the interpretation and application of international law and the…

5
International Refugee Assistance Project Inc

Irap is a global legal aid and advocacy organization working to create a world where refugees and all people seeking safety are empowered to claim their right to freedom of movement and a path to lasting refuge. everyone should have a safe…

Human Services
6
International Crisis Group

Crisis group works to prevent and resolve deadly conflict around the world by informing and influencing the perceptions and actions of policymakers and other key conflict actors. to this end, we endeavour to talk to all sides and provide…

International
7
Refugee & Immigrant Center for Education & Legal Services

To deliver legal and social services to people and families who want to put down roots in the u.s. and cultivate welcoming communities that uphold our collective freedoms.

Civil Rights
8
Relief International Inc

Relief international (ri) partners with communities impacted by conflict, climate change, and disaster to save lives, build greater resilience, and promote long-term health and wellbeing of people in the communities that we serve. relief…

International
9
Human Rights Watch Inc

Human rights watch ("hrw") defends the rights of people worldwide. we scrupulously investigate abuses, expose the facts widely, and pressure those with power to respect rights and secure justice. human rights watch is an independent,…

International
10
Partnership for Resource Development Inc

Serving the displaced in the middle east.

Religion
11
Onerefugee
Education
12
Norwegian Refugee Council Usa

The norwegian refugee council usa (nrc usa) is a non-profit organization that was incorporated under the laws of the district of columbia in october 2015 and commenced operations during 2016. nrc usa was established with two primary…

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rainbow Railroad Usa Inc and the most unlike its peers is Seneca Family of Agencies. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyJewish Community Organizati…Immigrant Worker SupportSenior Support ServicesChristian Missionary Organi…Community FoundationsCommunity Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%2%<5yr14%12%5–10yr19%28%10–20yr16%9%20–35yr13%23%35–55yr16%26%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr14%1%5–10yr19%14%10–20yr16%6%20–35yr13%16%35–55yr16%62%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/45
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,520

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

41 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
41/41
Grantees still filing
30/41
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

HIAS INC — $7,868,126 · InternationalHIAS INCInternational Rescue Committee INC — $6,319,000 · InternationalInternational Rescue Committee INCCHURCH WORLD SERVICE INC — $3,992,001 · InternationalCHURCH WORLD SERVICE INCThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc — $3,250,000 · InternationalThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee IncALIGHT — $1,428,538 · InternationalALIGHT+12 more — $3,644,750 · International+12 moreCATHOLIC CHARITIES CYO OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF SAN FRANCISCO — $1,950,000 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CH…ETHIOPIAN COMMUNITY DEV COUNCIL INC — $900,791 · Human ServicesETHIOPIAN C…HAITIAN BRIDGE ALLIANCE — $400,000 · Human ServicesHAITIAN BRI…TOGETHER & FREE INC — $300,000 · Human ServicesTOGETHER & …CHOOSE LOVE INC — $200,000 · Human Services+2 more — $212,632 · Human Services+2 moreSENECA FAMILY OF AGENCIES — $680,000 · OtherLUTHERAN IMMIGRATION & REFUGEE SERVICE INC DBA GLOBAL REFUGE — $587,265 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES USA — $575,000 · OtherUS COMMITTEE FOR REFUGEES AND IMMIGRANTS INC — $410,727 · OtherCATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES — $101,287 · Other+2 more — $120,000 · OtherCORE COMMUNITY ORGANIZED RELIEF EFFORT — $1,710,000 · Public Safety & DisasterTHE ST BERNARD PROJECT INC — $593,032 · Public Safety & DisasterBUILD CHANGE — $842,040 · Science & TechROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC — $790,000 · PhilanthropyEpiscopal Church Foundation — $550,000 · ReligionAINA MOMONA — $200,000 · Environment
International$26,502,415Human Services$3,963,423Other$2,474,279Public Safety & Disaster$2,303,032Science & Tech$842,040Philanthropy$790,000Religion$550,000Environment$200,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHIAS INC — $7,868,126 over 5y, 2.3% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC — $6,319,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetCHURCH WORLD SERVICE INC — $3,992,001 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc — $3,250,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES CYO OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF SAN FRANCISCO — $1,950,000 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetCORE COMMUNITY ORGANIZED RELIEF EFFORT — $1,710,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetALIGHT — $1,428,538 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetETHIOPIAN COMMUNITY DEV COUNCIL INC — $900,791 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC — $850,211 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBUILD CHANGE — $842,040 over 4y, 9.9% of budgetROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC — $790,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSENECA FAMILY OF AGENCIES — $680,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetORAM - ORGANIZATION FOR REFUGE ASYLUM & MIGRATION — $675,000 over 2y, 36% of budgetUnited States Association for UNHCR — $605,571 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTHE ST BERNARD PROJECT INC — $593,032 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetLUTHERAN IMMIGRATION & REFUGEE SERVICE INC DBA GLOBAL REFUGE — $587,265 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetEpiscopal Church Foundation — $550,000 over 2y, 6.9% of budgetUS COMMITTEE FOR REFUGEES AND IMMIGRANTS INC — $410,727 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTURKISH PHILANTHROPY FUNDS INC — $400,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetHAITIAN BRIDGE ALLIANCE — $400,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetWomen for Afghan Women Inc — $330,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetWORLD RELIEF CORP OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EVANGELICALS — $311,601 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTOGETHER & FREE INC — $300,000 over 1y, 64% of budgetAINA MOMONA — $200,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetCHOOSE LOVE INC — $200,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetINTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS — $157,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $130,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAFGHAN COALITION — $112,632 over 2y, 8.8% of budgetNEW ORLEANS FAMILY JUSTICE ALLIANCE — $100,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $64,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNOVA UKRAINE — $50,567 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR DIVERSITY AND INCLUSION IN EMERGENCY MGMT INC — $50,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetMercy Corps — $20,800 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fwdus Education Fund IncDC15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fwdus Education Fund Inc · Gofundmeorg · Tides Foundation · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · Catholic Legal Immigration Network Inc · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Impactassetsinc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Airbnborg Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 88%
  • Lutheran Immigration & Refugee Service Inc Dba Global Refuge100% of income from government
  • Hias Inc88% of income from government
  • World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals67% of income from government
  • Mercy Corps47% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
3rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Airbnborg Inc?

Find your warmest path to Airbnborg Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph