Skip to content
Aini Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Public charity

Aini Family Foundation Inc

Accept charitable gifts, bequests,grants and contributions to help fund other non profits that are exempt organizations under section 501(c)(3) of the internal revenue service code.

$162k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$61k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$983kHealth$50kArts & Culture$41kHuman Services$15kEducation$6kPhilanthropy$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $45k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $111k
$11,506
Median grant
2
States reached
$448k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SEPHARDIC LEBANESE CONGREGATION$60,694
YESHIVAH OF FLATBUSH$50,000
ISRAEL MEDICAL FUND$13,489
MEGAN DAVID YESHIVA$11,506
YDE SCHOOL$10,500
CONGREGATION SHAARI TEFILOH$10,000
SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM CONGREGATION$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $178k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%ISRAEL MEDICAL FUND: $26k → 17%ISRAEL MEDICAL FUND: $13k → 17%ISRAEL MEDICAL FUND: $11k → 17%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM CONGREGATION: $43k → 20%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM CONGREGATION: $24k → 20%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM CONGREGATION: $19k → 20%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM CONGREGATION: $17k → 20%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM CONGREGATION: $10k → 20%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM CONGREGATION: $6k → 20%CRIB EFRAT: $10k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$973k · 9 repeat orgs$153k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +45% since the first grant, against +28% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
9

Total granted

$973k
$131k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
+28%

Still filing today

44%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $22k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesReligionPhilanthropyEducationArts & CultureInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SC
    SBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC
    6× · 2017–2025 · $118k · revenue +82%
  • YD
    YESHIVAT DARCHE ERES INC
    7× · 2017–2025 · $101k · revenue +119%
  • CR
    CONGREGATION RODFEH ZEDEK INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $41k · revenue +45%

Funded once

  • TS
    THE SEPHARDIC HERITAGE MUSEUM INC
    one grant, 2022 · $41k · revenue -6%
  • MB
    MOSDOT BETH YAAKOVgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $39k · revenue +47%
  • CB
    CONGREGATION BETH TORAH
    one grant, 2024 · $13k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tal Hashamayim Foundation
Religion
2
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
3
Sherit Isroel
—
4
University of Judaism Foundation
—
5
Ohr Yitzchok Foundation
Philanthropy
6
Zichron Moshe Elihu Tzedoka Fund
Philanthropy
7
Zichron Chaim Meir Foundation
Philanthropy
8
Zichroin Rabbeini Meshilem Feiish Ztl Foundation
—
9
Idf Memorial Foundation
Philanthropy
10
Ohel Yakov Foundation
—
11
Tzemach Yifroch Foundation
—
12
The Keren Rachaim Fund
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Sephardic Heritage Museum Inc; the most unlike its peers is Meor Hachaim Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SEPHARDIC LEBANESE CONGREGATION INC: $468,903 · OtherSEPHARDIC LEBANESE CONGREGATION INCYESHIVAH OF FLATBUSH: $116,040 · OtherYESHIVAH OF FLATBUSHSYNAGOGUE OF OAKHURST COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $34,198 · OtherRENEWAL: $25,100 · Other+5 more: $46,010 · Other+5 moreYESHIVAT DARCHE ERES INC: $101,140 · ReligionYESHIVAT DARCHE ER…CONGREGATION RODFEH ZEDEK INC: $40,950 · ReligionCONGREGATION RODFE…MOSDOT BETH YAAKOV: $39,000 · ReligionMOSDOT BETH YAAKOVSBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC: $118,261 · Human ServicesSBH COMMUNITY SER…ISRAEL MEDICAL FUND CORP: $50,168 · Human ServicesISRAEL MEDICAL FU…Committee for the Rescue of Israel Babies DBA Efrat: $10,000 · Human ServicesCommittee for the…THE SEPHARDIC HERITAGE MUSEUM INC: $41,000 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN FRIENDS OF OHR TORAH INC: $18,000 · InternationalUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $5,400 · PhilanthropyMeor Hachaim Foundation: $5,200 · PhilanthropyMACAULAY HONORS COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $6,000 · Education
Other$690,251Religion$181,090Human Services$178,429Arts & Culture$41,000International$18,000Philanthropy$10,600Education$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC: $118,261 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetYESHIVAT DARCHE ERES INC: $101,140 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetISRAEL MEDICAL FUND CORP: $50,168 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHE SEPHARDIC HERITAGE MUSEUM INC: $41,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCONGREGATION RODFEH ZEDEK INC: $40,950 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetMOSDOT BETH YAAKOV: $39,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF OHR TORAH INC: $18,000 over 2y, 7.7% of budgetCommittee for the Rescue of Israel Babies DBA Efrat: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMACAULAY HONORS COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $5,400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMeor Hachaim Foundation: $5,200 over 1y, 18% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVAT DARCHE ERES INC ↗
  • Who funds ISRAEL MEDICAL FUND CORP ↗
  • Who funds THE SEPHARDIC HERITAGE MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds CONGREGATION RODFEH ZEDEK INC ↗
  • Who funds MOSDOT BETH YAAKOV ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF OHR TORAH INC ↗
  • Who funds Committee for the Rescue of Israel Babies DBA Efrat ↗
  • Who funds MACAULAY HONORS COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds Meor Hachaim Foundation ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundThe Ralph S Gindi Fam…Isaac & Marjorie Gind…Cabasso Family Founda…The Setton FoundationJack Adjmi Family Fou…The Maj Franco Family…The Madeb Family Foun…E R G FoundationThe Howard Hoffman & …Chehebar Family Found…T Rowe Price Program …
Jewish Communal FundNY22.6× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · The Ralph S Gindi Family Foundation · Isaac & Marjorie Gindi Foundation Inc · Cabasso Family Foundation · The Setton Foundation · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · The Maj Franco Family Charitable Foundation · The Madeb Family Foundation · E R G Foundation · The Howard Hoffman & Sons Foundation Inc · Chehebar Family Foundation · T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Aini Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Aini Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Aini Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home