Loading…
· Public charity
AINI FAMILY FOUNDATION INC
Accept charitable gifts, bequests,grants and contributions to help fund other non profits that are exempt organizations under section 501(c)(3) of the internal revenue service code.
$162k
Granted FY2025
7
Grants
2
Communities
$61k
Largest
01What you fund
01
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 63% of AINI FAMILY FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.
02FY2025 · 7 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k1 grant · $6k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $45k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $111k
$11,506
Median grant
2
States reached
$448k
Total assets
Largest grants
- SEPHARDIC LEBANESE CONGREGATION$60,694
- YESHIVAH OF FLATBUSH$50,000
- ISRAEL MEDICAL FUND$13,489
- MEGAN DAVID YESHIVA$11,506
- YDE SCHOOL$10,500
- CONGREGATION SHAARI TEFILOH$10,000
- SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM CONGREGATION$6,000
02The need
03
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $162k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19% — the area typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$858k · 9 repeat orgs$103k to everyone else
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +122% since the first grant, against +28% for the ones you funded once.
9 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
9
6
Total granted
$858k
$82k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+122%
+28%
Still filing today
44%
67%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $22k went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
Human ServicesReligionArts & CultureEducationPhilanthropyInternationalOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SBSEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM CONGREGATION5× · 2020–2025 · $102k · revenue +82%
- YSYDE SCHOOL6× · 2020–2025 · $86k · revenue +122%
- IMISRAEL MEDICAL FUND3× · 2021–2025 · $50k · revenue +706%
Funded once
- TSTHE SEPHARDIC HERITAGE MUSEUMgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $41k · revenue +331%
- CBCONGREGATION BETH TORAHone grant, 2024 · $13k
- CECRIB EFRATgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +28%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Sherit Isroel
—
2
Sephardic College for Rabbinic and
The organization's primary purpose is to train sephardic jewish individuals to become rabbis and teachers and to disseminate judaic and talmudic teachings.
Religion
3
Idf Memorial Foundation
Philanthropy
4
University of Judaism Foundation
—
5
American Committee for Shaare Zedek
To support shaare zedek medical center in jerusalem.
International
6
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
7
Yeshiva Derech Hatorah
To create a learning environment with jewish tradition and values that strives to help every student attain their highest educational goal.
Education
8
The Jewish Agency for Israel
The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center.it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…
—
9
American Friends of Tzir Hemed
Philanthropy
10
United Jewish Foundation
The united jewish foundation serves as custodian of the detroit jewish community's assets. the foundation is committed to preserving and growing the assets to meet the community's long term needs.
Philanthropy
11
Jewish National Fund
Jewish National Fund gives all generations of Jews a unique voice in building a prosperous future for the land of Israel and its people.
International
12
American Friends of Hebrew
Support the hebrew univ. of jerusalem, israel's foremost center of higher edu. & research.
International
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Yeshivat Darche Eres Inc and the most unlike its peers is United Jewish Appeal-Federation of. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network
9 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Other$602,406Human Services$161,725Religion$127,090Arts & Culture$41,000International$18,000Education$6,000Philanthropy$5,400
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Jewish Communal FundNY25.9× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Steven & Sharon Sutton Family Foundation · Hky Kol Yaakab Inc · Samuel & Mollie Jemal Foundation · United Jewish Appeal-Federation Of · Lidya Chami Hesed Foundation Inc · United Childrens Education Foundation · Mattan Basseter Inc · The Mamiye Foundation Inc · Jack Chehebar Foundation · E R G Foundation · Isaac & Marjorie Gindi Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation AINI FAMILY FOUNDATION INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: AMERICAN FRIENDS OF OHR TORAH.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
insufficient risk
Limited financial data in public filings.
Track record & reputation
low risk
8 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 3.7× since.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 473306917 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on AMERICAN FRIENDS OF OHR TORAH, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 8% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Aini Family Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Aini Family Foundation Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines